From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] null_blk: Fix scheduling in atomic with zoned mode
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:29:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X7Ol7OoF7z02TCVK@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201110073605.296624-1-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 04:36:05PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> commit e1777d099728a76a8f8090f89649aac961e7e530 upstream.
>
> Commit aa1c09cb65e2 ("null_blk: Fix locking in zoned mode") changed
> zone locking to using the potentially sleeping wait_on_bit_io()
> function. This is acceptable when memory backing is enabled as the
> device queue is in that case marked as blocking, but this triggers a
> scheduling while in atomic context with memory backing disabled.
>
> Fix this by relying solely on the device zone spinlock for zone
> information protection without temporarily releasing this lock around
> null_process_cmd() execution in null_zone_write(). This is OK to do
> since when memory backing is disabled, command processing does not
> block and the memory backing lock nullb->lock is unused. This solution
> avoids the overhead of having to mark a zoned null_blk device queue as
> blocking when memory backing is unused.
>
> This patch also adds comments to the zone locking code to explain the
> unusual locking scheme.
>
> Fixes: aa1c09cb65e2 ("null_blk: Fix locking in zoned mode")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> ---
> drivers/block/null_blk.h | 1 +
> drivers/block/null_blk_zoned.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-17 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-09 10:25 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] null_blk: Fix scheduling in atomic with zoned mode" failed to apply to 5.9-stable tree gregkh
2020-11-10 7:36 ` [PATCH] null_blk: Fix scheduling in atomic with zoned mode Damien Le Moal
2020-11-17 10:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-11-10 7:38 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] null_blk: Fix scheduling in atomic with zoned mode" failed to apply to 5.9-stable tree Damien Le Moal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-11-06 11:01 [PATCH] null_blk: Fix scheduling in atomic with zoned mode Damien Le Moal
2020-11-06 13:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-06 14:08 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-11-06 14:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-06 14:24 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-11-06 16:37 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X7Ol7OoF7z02TCVK@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.