From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>,
"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"tomas.winkler@intel.com" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"gregkh@google.com" <gregkh@google.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@samsung.com>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@samsung.com>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
Adel Choi <adel.choi@samsung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@samsung.com>,
SEUNGUK SHIN <seunguk.shin@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 19:35:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X85116BXkgTtRDKV@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201207182603.GA2499@infradead.org>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:26:03PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 07:23:12PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > What "real workload" test can be run on this to help show if it is
> > useful or not? These vendors seem to think it helps for some reason,
> > otherwise they wouldn't have added it to their silicon :)
> >
> > Should they run fio? If so, any hints on a config that would be good to
> > show any performance increases?
>
> A real actual workload that matters. Then again that was Martins
> request to even justify it. I don't think the broken addressing that
> breaks a whole in the SCSI addressing has absolutely not business being
> supported in Linux ever. The vendors should have thought about the
> design before committing transistors to something that fundamentally
> does not make sense.
So "time to boot an android system with this enabled and disabled" would
be a valid workload, right? I'm guessing that's what the vendors here
actually care about, otherwise there is no real stress-test on a UFS
system that I know of.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-07 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20201103044021epcms2p8f1556853fc23414442b9e958f20781ce@epcms2p8>
2020-11-03 4:40 ` [PATCH v13 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Daejun Park
2020-11-03 4:46 ` [PATCH v13 1/3] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB feature Daejun Park
2020-12-07 18:04 ` Greg KH
2020-12-15 1:24 ` Daejun Park
2020-11-03 4:47 ` [PATCH v13 2/3] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-11-03 4:47 ` [PATCH v13 3/3] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region Daejun Park
2020-11-05 8:16 ` [PATCH v13 0/3] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Can Guo
2020-12-07 17:56 ` Greg KH
2020-12-07 18:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 18:23 ` Greg KH
2020-12-07 18:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-07 18:35 ` Greg KH [this message]
2020-12-07 18:36 ` Greg KH
2020-12-07 18:54 ` James Bottomley
2020-12-07 19:08 ` Greg KH
2020-12-08 4:12 ` Daejun Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X85116BXkgTtRDKV@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=adel.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=boram.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=j-young.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sangyoon.oh@samsung.com \
--cc=seunguk.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=sungjun07.park@samsung.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=ymhungry.lee@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.