Re: [PATCH] fs/inode.c: make inode_init_always() initialize i_ino to 0

[Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>]

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:50:30AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:52:05AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 05:44:20PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > > 
> > > Currently inode_init_always() doesn't initialize i_ino to 0.  This is
> > > unexpected because unlike the other inode fields that aren't initialized
> > > by inode_init_always(), i_ino isn't guaranteed to end up back at its
> > > initial value after the inode is freed.  Only one filesystem (XFS)
> > > actually sets set i_ino back to 0 when freeing its inodes.
> > > 
> > > So, callers of new_inode() see some random previous i_ino.  Normally
> > > that's fine, since normally i_ino isn't accessed before being set.
> > > There can be edge cases where that isn't necessarily true, though.
> > > 
> > > The one I've run into is that on ext4, when creating an encrypted file,
> > > the new file's encryption key has to be set up prior to the jbd2
> > > transaction, and thus prior to i_ino being set.  If something goes
> > > wrong, fs/crypto/ may log warning or error messages, which normally
> > > include i_ino.  So it needs to know whether it is valid to include i_ino
> > > yet or not.  Also, on some files i_ino needs to be hashed for use in the
> > > crypto, so fs/crypto/ needs to know whether that can be done yet or not.
> > > 
> > > There are ways this could be worked around, either in fs/crypto/ or in
> > > fs/ext4/.  But, it seems there's no reason not to just fix
> > > inode_init_always() to do the expected thing and initialize i_ino to 0.
> > > 
> > > So, do that, and also remove the initialization in jfs_fill_super() that
> > > becomes redundant.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/inode.c     | 1 +
> > >  fs/jfs/super.c | 1 -
> > >  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> > > index 9d78c37b00b81..eb001129f157c 100644
> > > --- a/fs/inode.c
> > > +++ b/fs/inode.c
> > > @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ int inode_init_always(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode)
> > >  	atomic_set(&inode->i_count, 1);
> > >  	inode->i_op = &empty_iops;
> > >  	inode->i_fop = &no_open_fops;
> > > +	inode->i_ino = 0;
> > >  	inode->__i_nlink = 1;
> > >  	inode->i_opflags = 0;
> > >  	if (sb->s_xattr)
> > > diff --git a/fs/jfs/super.c b/fs/jfs/super.c
> > > index b2dc4d1f9dcc5..1f0ffabbde566 100644
> > > --- a/fs/jfs/super.c
> > > +++ b/fs/jfs/super.c
> > > @@ -551,7 +551,6 @@ static int jfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> > >  		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > >  		goto out_unload;
> > >  	}
> > > -	inode->i_ino = 0;
> > >  	inode->i_size = i_size_read(sb->s_bdev->bd_inode);
> > >  	inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &jfs_metapage_aops;
> > >  	inode_fake_hash(inode);
> > > 
> > 
> > Al, any thoughts on this?

Ping.