All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/pmu: Stop peeking at kernel internals for counting interrupts
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 20:45:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <X9JsylVFlr9ufO3/@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210173545.1508568-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 05:35:45PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> 
> Peeking at kernel internals is bad taste so instead we keep our own
> counter which also solves the problem of shared interrupt lines.
> 
> Additional cost should be way below noise relative to mmio reads.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 19 +------------------
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 5d04b282c060..de5cdcdc46b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -889,6 +889,9 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
>  	/* protects the irq masks */
>  	spinlock_t irq_lock;
>  
> +	/** Overall irq handler invocations. */
> +	u64 irq_count;
> +
>  	bool display_irqs_enabled;
>  
>  	/* To control wakeup latency, e.g. for irq-driven dp aux transfers. */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index b245109f73e3..a88c1da025f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1596,6 +1596,8 @@ static irqreturn_t valleyview_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>  	if (!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv))
>  		return IRQ_NONE;
>  
> +	dev_priv->irq_count++;

Would rather have to be something like
if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
	irq_count++;

if we really wanted to count only our interrupts when the
irq line is shared.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-10 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10 17:35 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/pmu: Stop peeking at kernel internals for counting interrupts Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-12-10 18:29 ` Chris Wilson
2020-12-10 18:45 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-12-10 20:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: warning for " Patchwork
2020-12-10 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=X9JsylVFlr9ufO3/@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.