All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: CPU affinity & IPI latency (FIX)_
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:56:06 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <XFMail.20010719095606.davidel@xmailserver.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF592B2674.D77BFDC0-ON85256A8C.00649982@pok.ibm.com>


On 17-Jul-2001 Hubertus Franke wrote:
> 
> 
> This only applies only to the idle thread and it says that the idle
> thread actively monitors its need_resched flag and hence will
> instantly call schedule() at that point. Hence there won't be any
> delay either for IPI or for waiting to return from the kernel.
> 
> You might be right that the problem situation still arises, because
> the idle_thread needs to content again for the lock.
> Let me ask the otherway around, why do we HAVE to put it in ?
> And if I missed something here, we put it outside the <if> clause.

Yep, we were talking about two different if-locations :)
Anyway, it's right, using the poll idle we've to change the position of the
assignment.




- Davide


  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-19 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-17 18:28 [Lse-tech] Re: CPU affinity & IPI latency (FIX)_ Hubertus Franke
2001-07-19 16:56 ` Davide Libenzi [this message]
     [not found] <OF51487F8A.564A5A7D-ON85256A8C.0063C208@pok.ibm.com>
2001-07-17 18:12 ` Hubertus Franke
     [not found] <OF46AE0C03.7FA13916-ON85256A8C.005E4CEB@pok.ibm.com>
2001-07-17 17:33 ` Hubertus Frnake
2001-07-17 18:00   ` Davide Libenzi
2001-07-17 18:11   ` Davide Libenzi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=XFMail.20010719095606.davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --to=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=frankeh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.