From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 01:25:36 +1100 (EST) From: James Morris To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Stephen Smalley , Christoph Hellwig , "David P. Quigley" , casey@schaufler-ca.com, chrisw@sous-sol.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] LSM/SELinux: inode_{get,set}secctx hooks to access LSM security context information. In-Reply-To: <20080306140713.GA20087@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <1204743288-3461-1-git-send-email-dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov> <1204743288-3461-3-git-send-email-dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov> <20080306123013.GB4648@lst.de> <1204811422.1397.205.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20080306135444.GA5216@infradead.org> <1204812304.1397.213.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20080306140713.GA20087@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Ok, this makes a lot more sense. These defintively should be different > hooks in that case, and no matter what name they have (no good ideas > from me either currently) Perhaps setsecctx and storesecctx ? -- James Morris -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] LSM/SELinux: inode_{get,set}secctx hooks to access LSM security context information. Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 01:25:36 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: References: <1204743288-3461-1-git-send-email-dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov> <1204743288-3461-3-git-send-email-dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov> <20080306123013.GB4648@lst.de> <1204811422.1397.205.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20080306135444.GA5216@infradead.org> <1204812304.1397.213.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20080306140713.GA20087@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Stephen Smalley , Christoph Hellwig , "David P. Quigley" , casey@schaufler-ca.com, chrisw@sous-sol.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080306140713.GA20087@infradead.org> Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Ok, this makes a lot more sense. These defintively should be different > hooks in that case, and no matter what name they have (no good ideas > from me either currently) Perhaps setsecctx and storesecctx ? -- James Morris