From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] cgroups: implement device whitelist lsm (v2)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:27:32 +1100 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Xine.LNX.4.64.0803140925410.30342@us.intercode.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080313143803.GA11265@sergelap.austin.ibm.com>
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> True, but while this change simplifies the code a bit, the semantics
> seem more muddled - devcg will be enforcing when CONFIG_CGROUP_DEV=y
> and:
>
> SECURITY=n or
> rootplug is enabled
> capabilities is enabled
> smack is enabled
> selinux+capabilities is enabled
Well, this is how real systems are going to be deployed.
It becomes confusing, IMHO, if you have to change which secondary LSM you
stack with SELinux to enable a cgroup feature.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-13 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-13 3:27 [RFC] cgroups: implement device whitelist lsm (v2) Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-13 9:25 ` James Morris
2008-03-13 13:18 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-13 13:50 ` James Morris
2008-03-13 14:38 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-13 22:27 ` James Morris [this message]
2008-03-13 22:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-13 23:49 ` James Morris
2008-03-14 1:41 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-14 4:47 ` Greg KH
2008-03-14 13:54 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-14 13:58 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-14 15:45 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-14 15:54 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-14 16:57 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-14 9:28 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-14 13:58 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-14 14:05 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-14 14:37 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-14 15:07 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-14 14:12 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-14 14:42 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-16 0:59 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-14 2:51 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-14 9:16 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-14 14:05 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-14 14:15 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-14 14:35 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-03-16 0:57 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-14 9:18 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-14 14:00 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Xine.LNX.4.64.0803140925410.30342@us.intercode.com.au \
--to=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.