From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zombie.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m3ANlI7U008081 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:47:18 -0400 Received: from us.intercode.com.au (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by zombie.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m3ANlHsY025356 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:47:17 GMT Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:04:32 +1000 (EST) From: James Morris To: Paul Moore cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.26 In-Reply-To: <200804101725.59604.paul.moore@hp.com> Message-ID: References: <20080409204936.26774.55254.stgit@flek.lan> <200804101725.59604.paul.moore@hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Paul Moore wrote: > Just a quick follow-up on testing, I've run this for a few hours on two > Fedora systems with both labeled and unlabeled IPsec in use with SAs > rekeying every 5 minutes and didn't notice anything evil. > > At this point I'd strip the "RFC" from the patchset and ask that they be > considered for inclusion in 2.6.26 assuming there are no objections. I suggest pushing them via DaveM's tree, unless they depend on anything in my tree. - James -- James Morris -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.26 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:04:32 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: References: <20080409204936.26774.55254.stgit@flek.lan> <200804101725.59604.paul.moore@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov To: Paul Moore Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200804101725.59604.paul.moore@hp.com> Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Paul Moore wrote: > Just a quick follow-up on testing, I've run this for a few hours on two > Fedora systems with both labeled and unlabeled IPsec in use with SAs > rekeying every 5 minutes and didn't notice anything evil. > > At this point I'd strip the "RFC" from the patchset and ask that they be > considered for inclusion in 2.6.26 assuming there are no objections. I suggest pushing them via DaveM's tree, unless they depend on anything in my tree. - James -- James Morris