On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, David Miller wrote: > From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ > Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:54:37 +0900 (JST) > > > In article <20080426.202558.208247674.davem@davemloft.net> (at Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:25:58 -0700 (PDT)), David Miller says: > > > > > What about the format is it fixing? > > > > Sorry... > > I now understand the problem with the new changelog message. > > > > Also, can this possibly break existing audit log scanning > > > tools and parsers? > > > > James? > > > > We could add "flowlabel", but it is possible to break something, too. > > Anyway, because the log format did not make sense as audit log, > > we need to fix it. > > > > --- > > [XFRM] AUDIT: Fix flowlabel text format ambibuity. > > > > Flowlabel text format was not correct and thus ambiguous. > > For example, 0x00123 or 0x01203 are formatted as 0x123. > > This is not what audit tools want. > > > > Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki > > Patch applied, James if you have some objections let me know, > otherwise I'll toss this to -stable too. Ok, cc'ing Paul Moore, who's maintining this now. -- James Morris