From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huawei.com>,
will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
npiggin@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk,
luc.maranget@inria.fr, akiyks@gmail.com, dlustig@nvidia.com,
joel@joelfernandes.org, urezki@gmail.com,
quic_neeraju@quicinc.com, frederic@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tools/memory-model: Make ppo a subrelation of po
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 20:40:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/0HEESX2wDWtPS1@andrea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y/rEH2r9i0BtfxEW@rowland.harvard.edu>
> The LKMM doesn't believe that a control or data dependency orders a
> plain write after a marked read. Hence in this test it thinks that P1's
> store to u0 can happen before the load of x1. I don't remember why we
> did it this way -- probably we just wanted to minimize the restrictions
> on when plain accesses can execute. (I do remember the reason for
> making address dependencies induce order; it was so RCU would work.)
>
> The patch below will change what the LKMM believes. It eliminates the
> positive outcome of the litmus test and the data race. Should it be
> adopted into the memory model?
(Unpopular opinion I know,) it should drop dependencies ordering, not
add/promote it.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-27 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-24 13:52 [PATCH v3] tools/memory-model: Make ppo a subrelation of po Jonas Oberhauser
2023-02-24 15:32 ` Alan Stern
2023-02-24 18:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-26 1:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-26 2:29 ` Alan Stern
2023-02-26 3:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-26 18:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-26 3:09 ` Boqun Feng
2023-02-26 3:30 ` Alan Stern
2023-02-26 11:17 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-02-26 16:51 ` Alan Stern
2023-02-26 18:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-26 19:32 ` Alan Stern
2023-02-27 14:03 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-02-27 16:16 ` Alan Stern
2023-02-27 16:50 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-02-27 18:41 ` Alan Stern
2023-02-27 19:40 ` Andrea Parri [this message]
2023-02-27 20:13 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-02-27 22:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-28 8:49 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-02-28 15:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-01 10:52 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-03-02 1:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-26 2:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-26 16:23 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-02-27 14:39 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-02-27 17:57 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-02-27 20:24 ` Jonas Oberhauser
2023-02-27 19:35 ` Andrea Parri
2023-02-28 22:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/0HEESX2wDWtPS1@andrea \
--to=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=jonas.oberhauser@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.