From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Philipp Rudo <prudo@redhat.com>
Cc: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kexec: Default __NR_kexec_file_load is set to undefined
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 21:32:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/4CaolPP0U4h6bB@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230227161919.7c4884cd@rotkaeppchen>
Hi Philipp,
On 02/27/23 at 04:19pm, Philipp Rudo wrote:
......
> > diff --git a/kexec/kexec-syscall.h b/kexec/kexec-syscall.h
> > index be6ccd5..ea77936 100644
> > --- a/kexec/kexec-syscall.h
> > +++ b/kexec/kexec-syscall.h
> > @@ -59,9 +59,7 @@
> > #endif
> > #endif /*ifndef __NR_kexec_load*/
> >
> > -#ifdef __arm__
> > #undef __NR_kexec_file_load
> > -#endif
> >
> > #ifndef __NR_kexec_file_load
>
> I don't think this will work as intended.
>
> On the top of the file sys/syscall.h gets included. In there
> architectures that support kexec_file_load define __NR_kexec_file_load.
> This also means that if an architecture doesn't support kexec_file_load
> __NR_kexec_file_load shouldn't be defined in the first place. Thus I
> suggest that you find out why sys/syscall.h defines
> __NR_kexec_file_load for LoongArch even when the system call is not
> supported and fix it there.
Checking whether LoongArch has defined __NR_kexec_file_load sounds a
good suggestion. Wondering why we still need add __NR_kexec_file_load
definition in kexec-tools. E.g below s390 kexec_file support you added.
<sys/syscall.h> sometime won't be found or __NR_kexec_file_load could be
not defined yet?
commit d4a948c268272cf37c71be820fb02bf40e56292b
Author: Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed May 16 14:27:18 2018 +0200
kexec/s390: Add support for kexec_file_load
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-28 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-24 9:51 [PATCH 1/2] kexec: Default __NR_kexec_file_load is set to undefined Youling Tang
2023-02-24 9:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] LoongArch: kdump: Set up kernel image segment Youling Tang
2023-02-27 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] kexec: Default __NR_kexec_file_load is set to undefined Philipp Rudo
2023-02-28 13:32 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-03-03 11:03 ` Philipp Rudo
2023-03-07 3:28 ` Baoquan He
[not found] ` <eb34b2b5-3965-27f1-2fe5-bb4fda4ef16b@loongson.cn>
2023-03-03 10:54 ` Philipp Rudo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/4CaolPP0U4h6bB@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=prudo@redhat.com \
--cc=tangyouling@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.