All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: phy: EEE fixes
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:36:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/SQo20Qes2GpoeM@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230221050334.578012-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 06:03:30AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> changes v2:
> - restore previous ethtool set logic for the case where advertisements
>   are not provided by user space.

I don't think the _kernel_ should be doing this - this introduces a
different behaviour to the kernel. As I already said, setting the
default advertisement in the case of ethtool -s is done by userspace
not by the kernel.

In fact, the kernel explicitly rejects an attempt to have autoneg
enabled with a zero advertising mask:

        linkmode_copy(advertising, cmd->link_modes.advertising);
        linkmode_and(advertising, advertising, phydev->supported);
        if (autoneg == AUTONEG_ENABLE && linkmode_empty(advertising))
                return -EINVAL;

and I think we should have a uniform behaviour with the same API,
rather than different behaviours, as that becomes quite messy.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-21  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-21  5:03 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: phy: EEE fixes Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-21  5:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: phy: c45: use "supported_eee" instead of supported for access validation Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-21  5:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: phy: c45: add genphy_c45_an_config_eee_aneg() function Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-21 11:57   ` Paolo Abeni
2023-02-21  5:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: phy: do not force EEE support Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-21  5:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: phy: c45: genphy_c45_ethtool_set_eee: validate EEE link modes Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-21  9:36 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2023-02-21  9:48   ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: phy: EEE fixes Oleksij Rempel
2023-02-21  9:52     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-02-21 11:45 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-02-21 11:52   ` Paolo Abeni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y/SQo20Qes2GpoeM@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.