From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 815E0C61DA3 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0ACF10E300; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E22C10E300 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:47:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1676990843; x=1708526843; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=XTGo48T6ZE0A7w5zXfExiQZ3/GU9rd1utMaBWmpTObE=; b=LL4xDdsULIW4z/9GyP/q9Io9Z4pLn/+FIb2JzJOSt0nUO4Nk7FkhOdBL 8ohXjcexHAfxF48CVVLtcfB2F1f4AR4kPlG99fVDq0WwyAuoq5iZKcFor D/ZDCwOxTGPOL2t8gY+dMpKDyN1Q5dIEDTbr2QyKBkO+/Fqk2KE8TzT1+ hnCmGn+xYcBxvYThvKoB2S7wOMnBw4qfO73r/m55tWT8WSwLIsVJZZscN FrMSkgFbgb1V2p3CcSJjOYOIy6myf8A3SUI58RUui7SoJhvqPkrMM70bc ujnCJl+R7Oth4m1S60MDZpvzfPjfNGjy5xAj+oLeSwpkm5Pa5ucWUWFgN g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10627"; a="320780182" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,315,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="320780182" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Feb 2023 06:47:23 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10627"; a="649202434" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,315,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="649202434" Received: from stinkpipe.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.70]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 21 Feb 2023 06:47:21 -0800 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:47:20 +0200 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:47:20 +0200 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Message-ID: References: <20230220234046.29716-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <20230220234046.29716-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20230220234046.29716-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> X-Patchwork-Hint: comment Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/18] drm/i915: Sanitize child devices later X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 01:40:35AM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c > index f35ef3675d39..19be8862261b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c > @@ -2221,33 +2221,33 @@ static u8 map_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 vbt_pin) > vbt_pin); > return 0; > } > > -static enum port get_port_by_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 ddc_pin) > +static struct intel_encoder * > +get_encoder_by_ddc_pin(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 ddc_pin) > { > - enum port port; > + struct intel_encoder *encoder; > > if (!ddc_pin) > - return PORT_NONE; > + return NULL; > > - for_each_port(port) { > - const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata = > - i915->display.vbt.ports[port]; > + for_each_intel_encoder(&i915->drm, encoder) { > + const struct intel_bios_encoder_data *devdata = encoder->devdata; > > if (devdata && ddc_pin == devdata->child.ddc_pin) > - return port; > + return encoder; This still screws up bat-jsl-3 where DDI A and DDI C both claim to use the same ddc_pin. But DDI A is declared as eDP, so won't even use DDC. Se we should just ignore it here. I suppose to correct fix would to look at the actually selected ddc_pin/aux_ch here, rather than what the VBT declared. > } > > - return PORT_NONE; > + return NULL; > } > -- Ville Syrjälä Intel