From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>, Thomas Devoogdt <thomas@devoogdt.com>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Devoogdt <thomas.devoogdt@barco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [iptables] extensions: libxt_LOG.c: fix linux/netfilter/xt_LOG.h include on Linux < 3.4
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 14:30:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/YZC1Feu9gOCdWF@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y/YFcwp/gyZY5Pmw@orbyte.nwl.cc>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 01:07:15PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:04:41AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 08:23:49AM +0100, Thomas Devoogdt wrote:
> > > libxt_LOG.c:6:10: fatal error: linux/netfilter/xt_LOG.h: No such file or directory
> > > . #include <linux/netfilter/xt_LOG.h>
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > > Linux < 3.4 defines are in include/linux/netfilter_ipv{4,6}/ipt_LOG.h,
> > > but the naming is slightly different, so just define it here as the values are the same.
> > >
> > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/6939c33a757bd006c5e0b8b5fd429fc587a4d0f4
> >
> > Probably you could add xt_LOG.h to iptables/include/linux/netfilter/ ?
> >
> > There are plenty of headers that are cached there to make sure
> > userspace compile with minimal external dependencies.
> >
> > xt_LOG.h is missing for some reason in that folder, but there are many
> > of xt_*.h files there.
>
> While being at it, how about caching all netfilter kernel headers we
> include? The only downside I see is that we may have to update them from
> time to time (in case new symbols land) but that's rare and the
> alternative is accidental breakages like above.
Caching _all_ dependencies is going to be hard, because it might pull
in lots of header files. The idea so far has been to find a reasonable
tradeoff, ensuring that iptables compilation is self-contained in a
best effort approach.
> WDYT? I'd volunteer to do it. :)
iptables already caches a lot of header files, as I said I don't
remember why this one has never been cached before.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-22 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-22 7:23 [PATCH] [iptables] extensions: libxt_LOG.c: fix linux/netfilter/xt_LOG.h include on Linux < 3.4 Thomas Devoogdt
2023-02-22 10:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-02-22 12:07 ` Phil Sutter
2023-02-22 13:30 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2023-02-22 15:32 ` Phil Sutter
2023-02-22 15:34 ` Phil Sutter
2023-02-22 15:55 ` Phil Sutter
2023-02-22 16:21 ` Thomas Devoogdt
2023-02-22 16:38 ` Phil Sutter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/YZC1Feu9gOCdWF@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=thomas.devoogdt@barco.com \
--cc=thomas@devoogdt.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.