From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] landlock.7: Document Landlock ABI v2 (file reparenting; kernel 5.19)
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:39:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/cmUt8XtTU6pm0P@galopp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae071c4a4da0204d3921478797e41b1a@mail.infomaniak.com>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 08:01:31AM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> I think this table is useful, but it should contain a warning to make sure developers don't rely on kernel versions to check Landlock features, but use the dedicated Landlock syscall instead.
> It should be explained that this table is true for the mainline/vanilla kernel, but that can be incorrect for any other kernel (e.g. patched distro kernel, like chromeOS that may backport upstream features).
Thanks, that's a good point. I'll add that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-23 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-21 20:50 [PATCH 1/3] landlock.7: Move the warning about missing features into the CAVEATS section Günther Noack
2023-02-21 20:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] landlock.7: Document Landlock ABI v2 (file reparenting; kernel 5.19) Günther Noack
2023-02-22 7:01 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-02-23 8:39 ` Günther Noack [this message]
2023-02-22 7:36 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-02-23 8:48 ` Günther Noack
2023-02-25 1:10 ` Alex Colomar
2023-02-25 1:19 ` G. Branden Robinson
2023-02-25 1:29 ` Alex Colomar
2023-02-28 19:46 ` Günther Noack
2023-02-25 1:06 ` Alex Colomar
2023-02-22 7:45 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-02-23 9:18 ` Günther Noack
2023-02-24 23:21 ` Alex Colomar
2023-02-28 20:21 ` Günther Noack
2023-02-21 20:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] landlock.7: Document Landlock ABI v3 (file truncation; kernel 6.2) Günther Noack
2023-02-22 8:04 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-02-23 9:24 ` Günther Noack
2023-02-24 23:31 ` Alex Colomar
2023-02-28 20:29 ` Günther Noack
2023-02-24 23:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] landlock.7: Move the warning about missing features into the CAVEATS section Alex Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/cmUt8XtTU6pm0P@galopp \
--to=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.