diff for duplicates of <Y/elw7CTvVWt0Js6@google.com> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 221ee0c..8276da9 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -4,18 +4,18 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v1 5/5] mm: multi-gen LRU: use mmu_notifier_test_clear_young()\0" "Date\0Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:43:31 -0800\0" "To\0Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>\0" - "Cc\0Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>" - Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> + "Cc\0linux-mm@google.com" + kvm@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Michael Larabel <michael@michaellarabel.com> - kvmarm@lists.linux.dev - kvm@vger.kernel.org - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + x86@kernel.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org linux-mm@kvack.org + kvmarm@lists.linux.dev + Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> + Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org - x86@kernel.org - " linux-mm@google.com\0" + " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Thu, Feb 16, 2023, Yu Zhao wrote:\n" @@ -76,4 +76,4 @@ "if we want to avoid batching when there are no mmu_notifier listeners, probe\n" mmu_notifiers. But don't call into KVM directly. -576b2fec7b0f2bc52aa7b36aa38e00f75c09a357e01435e2643a6645fe85d45d +7b4ca198a536fedc80fe9c50c9112f3d6de21576e55d571fd5d919f169b3ceba
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index af14a6e..5e6ba94 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -55,3 +55,8 @@ a lockless walk is somehow _worse_ than using the existing mmu_notifier_clear_fl I think batching the calls should be conditional only on LRU_GEN_SPTE_WALK. Or if we want to avoid batching when there are no mmu_notifier listeners, probe mmu_notifiers. But don't call into KVM directly. + +_______________________________________________ +linux-arm-kernel mailing list +linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 221ee0c..8b85e7d 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ "a lockless walk is somehow _worse_ than using the existing mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(),\n" "I think batching the calls should be conditional only on LRU_GEN_SPTE_WALK. Or\n" "if we want to avoid batching when there are no mmu_notifier listeners, probe\n" - mmu_notifiers. But don't call into KVM directly. + "mmu_notifiers. But don't call into KVM directly.\n" + "\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n" + "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -576b2fec7b0f2bc52aa7b36aa38e00f75c09a357e01435e2643a6645fe85d45d +a21dd97123a544a6e52dd631da2359e0291e3c64991ef9226c8c73db1319c033
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.