From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: longman@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] locking/rwsem: Unify wait loop
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:33:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/gUAdaFf20PDUkO@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y/e/I1aqDAjoq2Rs@boqun-archlinux>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:31:47AM -0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
[..]
> > +#define waiter_type(_waiter, _r, _w) \
> > + ((_waiter)->type == RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ ? (_r) : (_w))
> > +
> > +static __always_inline struct rw_semaphore *
> > +rwsem_waiter_wait(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct rwsem_waiter *waiter, int state)
> > +{
> > + trace_contention_begin(sem, waiter_type(waiter, LCB_F_READ, LCB_F_WRITE));
> > +
> > + /* wait to be given the lock */
> > + for (;;) {
> > + set_current_state(state);
> > + if (!smp_load_acquire(&waiter->task)) {
> > + /* Matches rwsem_waiter_wake()'s smp_store_release(). */
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
> > + raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
>
> Move the below __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING)s up here? I think we
> need the preemption protection when changing the task state here.
>
Nevermind since we have the preemption protection for the whole
function... but merging two __set_current_state()s into one still looks
good.
Regards,
Boqun
> > + if (waiter->task)
> > + goto out_nolock;
>
[...]
> > +
> > + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > + lockevent_inc(waiter_type(waiter, rwsem_rlock, rwsem_wlock));
> > + trace_contention_end(sem, 0);
> > + return sem;
> > +
> > +out_nolock:
> > + rwsem_del_wake_waiter(sem, waiter);
> > + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > + lockevent_inc(waiter_type(waiter, rwsem_rlock_fail, rwsem_wlock_fail));
> > + trace_contention_end(sem, -EINTR);
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Wait for the read lock to be granted
> > */
> > @@ -1071,38 +1109,7 @@ rwsem_down_read_slowpath(struct rw_semap
> > if (!wake_q_empty(&wake_q))
> > wake_up_q(&wake_q);
> >
> > - trace_contention_begin(sem, LCB_F_READ);
> > -
> > - /* wait to be given the lock */
> > - for (;;) {
> > - set_current_state(state);
> > - if (!smp_load_acquire(&waiter.task)) {
> > - /* Matches rwsem_waiter_wake()'s smp_store_release(). */
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
> > - raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > - if (waiter.task)
> > - goto out_nolock;
> > - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > - /* Ordered by sem->wait_lock against rwsem_mark_wake(). */
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - schedule_preempt_disabled();
> > - lockevent_inc(rwsem_sleep_reader);
> > - }
> > -
> > - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > - lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock);
> > - trace_contention_end(sem, 0);
> > - return sem;
> > -
> > -out_nolock:
> > - rwsem_del_wake_waiter(sem, &waiter, &wake_q);
> > - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > - lockevent_inc(rwsem_rlock_fail);
> > - trace_contention_end(sem, -EINTR);
> > - return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
> > + return rwsem_waiter_wait(sem, &waiter, state);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -1150,37 +1157,7 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_sema
> > }
> > raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> >
> > - /* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */
> > - trace_contention_begin(sem, LCB_F_WRITE);
> > -
> > - for (;;) {
> > - set_current_state(state);
> > - if (!smp_load_acquire(&waiter.task)) {
> > - /* Matches rwsem_waiter_wake()'s smp_store_release(). */
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
> > - raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > - if (waiter.task)
> > - goto out_nolock;
> > - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
> > - /* Ordered by sem->wait_lock against rwsem_mark_wake(). */
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - schedule_preempt_disabled();
> > - lockevent_inc(rwsem_sleep_writer);
> > - }
> > - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > - lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock);
> > - trace_contention_end(sem, 0);
> > - return sem;
> > -
> > -out_nolock:
> > - rwsem_del_wake_waiter(sem, &waiter, &wake_q);
> > - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > - lockevent_inc(rwsem_wlock_fail);
> > - trace_contention_end(sem, -EINTR);
> > - return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
> > + return rwsem_waiter_wait(sem, &waiter, state);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-24 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-23 12:26 [PATCH 0/6] locking/rwsem: Rework writer wakeup and handoff Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] locking/rwsem: Minor code refactoring in rwsem_mark_wake() Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] locking/rwsem: Enforce queueing when HANDOFF Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] locking/rwsem: Rework writer wakeup Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 21:38 ` Waiman Long
2023-02-26 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-26 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-26 21:31 ` Waiman Long
2023-02-24 10:11 ` Hillf Danton
2023-02-26 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-26 15:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-26 16:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-27 0:22 ` Waiman Long
2023-02-27 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-27 20:16 ` Waiman Long
2023-03-20 8:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-20 17:36 ` Waiman Long
2023-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] locking/rwsem: Split out rwsem_reader_wake() Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-25 10:15 ` Hillf Danton
2023-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 5/6] locking/rwsem: Unify wait loop Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 19:31 ` Boqun Feng
2023-02-24 1:33 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2023-02-26 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-26 18:22 ` Boqun Feng
2023-02-23 22:45 ` Waiman Long
2023-02-26 16:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-23 12:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] locking/rwsem: Use the force Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-24 1:19 ` [PATCH 0/6] locking/rwsem: Rework writer wakeup and handoff Waiman Long
2023-02-24 11:55 ` Jiri Wiesner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/gUAdaFf20PDUkO@boqun-archlinux \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.