From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 11:17:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/icsrUPXoxqPCLj@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230223141540.701637224@linuxfoundation.org>
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 03:16:29PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.170 release.
> There are 26 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:15:30 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230210):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2930
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2933
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-24 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-23 14:16 [PATCH 5.10 00/26] 5.10.170-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-02-23 17:42 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-02-23 20:42 ` Pavel Machek
2023-02-23 23:36 ` Shuah Khan
2023-02-24 3:47 ` Slade Watkins
2023-02-24 4:28 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-24 11:17 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) [this message]
2023-02-24 11:43 ` Naresh Kamboju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/icsrUPXoxqPCLj@debian \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.