All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: LTP: preadv03: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 101250 at mm/gup.c:2121 is_valid_gup_args (mm/gup.c:2121 (discriminator 1))
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 08:39:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+JGh0+a540TLr6V@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYvAURcTwqyGwoTpxAOR0EDTbU6a71d5z74R4Wv-qT02OQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 02:09:27PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Following test regressions noticed on Linux next-20230207.
> LTP syscalls pwritev03 and preadv03 failed.
> The tests use external mounted SSD drives for creating tmp files.
> 
> Regressions found on arm64 juno-r2 and x86:
>   - ltp-syscalls/pwritev03
>   - ltp-syscalls/preadv03
>   - ltp-syscalls/pwritev03_64
>   - ltp-syscalls/preadv03_64
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

Yes, this is what Stephen noticed, it is a merge resolution problem
in linux-next

https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y+JBak3Tt8Pdw3yE@nvidia.com/

Jason

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] LTP: preadv03: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 101250 at mm/gup.c:2121 is_valid_gup_args (mm/gup.c:2121 (discriminator 1))
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 08:39:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+JGh0+a540TLr6V@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYvAURcTwqyGwoTpxAOR0EDTbU6a71d5z74R4Wv-qT02OQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 02:09:27PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Following test regressions noticed on Linux next-20230207.
> LTP syscalls pwritev03 and preadv03 failed.
> The tests use external mounted SSD drives for creating tmp files.
> 
> Regressions found on arm64 juno-r2 and x86:
>   - ltp-syscalls/pwritev03
>   - ltp-syscalls/preadv03
>   - ltp-syscalls/pwritev03_64
>   - ltp-syscalls/preadv03_64
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

Yes, this is what Stephen noticed, it is a merge resolution problem
in linux-next

https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y+JBak3Tt8Pdw3yE@nvidia.com/

Jason

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-07 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-07  8:39 LTP: preadv03: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 101250 at mm/gup.c:2121 is_valid_gup_args (mm/gup.c:2121 (discriminator 1)) Naresh Kamboju
2023-02-07  8:39 ` [LTP] " Naresh Kamboju
2023-02-07 12:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-02-07 12:39   ` Jason Gunthorpe via ltp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y+JGh0+a540TLr6V@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.