From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 0/4] bindings: implement python bindings for libgpiod v2
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:41:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0a2Fdyhh+urE97R@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=Md_5cThJwu7iLW14XP=8hADBmOk2DYt2axuG=jWa-jkcA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 02:34:44PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 4:55 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > This is the third iteration of python bindings for libgpiod but it really has
> > very little in common with the previous version.
> >
> > This time the code has been split into high-level python and low-level
> > C layers with the latter only doing the bare minimum.
> >
> > The data model is mostly based on the C++ one with the main difference
> > being utilizing dynamic typing and keyword arguments in place of the
> > builder pattern. That allows us to reduce the number of methods and
> > objects.
> >
> > Because python doesn't have RAII, unlike C++, we provide a module-level
> > request_lines() helper as gpiod.Chip(path).request_lines(...) one-liner
> > could lead to the chip left dangling even after the last reference is
> > dropped.
> >
> > Because python forces us to dynamically allocate objects all the time even
> > for fundamental types (which are also immutable) there's no point in trying
> > to replicate the edge-event buffer. Instead LineRequest.read_edge_event()
> > just returns a list of events.
> >
> > Bartosz Golaszewski (4):
> >
>
> I fixed the one nit from Andy. If there are no objections I'd like to
> apply this and squash the entire v2 patch series into one big commit
> and apply it to the master branch. This way we can stop keeping this
> temporary branch and continue the development (tools, rust, possible
> further tweaks to the API) on master.
>
I'm in the process of reviewing, so hold off for a bit if you can.
If not, at the very least IIIIpdII -> IIIIpkII in patch 4.
Otherwise you get this on 32 bit platforms:
$ gpioget.py /dev/gpiochip0 17
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
Cheers,
Kent.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-12 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-07 14:55 [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 0/4] bindings: implement python bindings for libgpiod v2 Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-07 14:55 ` [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 1/4] bindings: python: remove old version Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-07 14:55 ` [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 2/4] bindings: python: add examples Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-13 3:09 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-17 12:00 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-17 12:11 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-17 13:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-17 14:07 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-17 14:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-17 15:53 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-17 16:09 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-17 16:20 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-17 16:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-17 16:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-17 17:26 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-17 16:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-17 16:39 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-07 14:55 ` [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 3/4] bindings: python: add tests Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-13 3:09 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-07 14:55 ` [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 4/4] bindings: python: implement python bindings for libgpiod v2 Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-07 15:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-10-07 18:19 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-13 3:10 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-13 11:12 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-26 12:32 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-26 12:56 ` Kent Gibson
2022-10-12 12:34 ` [libgpiod v2][PATCH v3 0/4] bindings: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-12 12:41 ` Kent Gibson [this message]
2022-10-12 12:51 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-10-12 13:03 ` Kent Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y0a2Fdyhh+urE97R@sol \
--to=warthog618@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.