From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44CE9C433FE for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35118 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oidJr-0005iq-EI for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:06:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oidG8-0002uj-6s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:03:00 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:23549) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oidG6-000320-OX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:02:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1665586977; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1FhIBD/AwGEWy/vwoy0Ufg+xg1nIf17Pzg/SOBX0zs8=; b=BS7P2ssg7fmcdLpAtKzJ5RlN6H69l6D9SSm2p7TNvw9fv8YB5ic3VmiXV9IGncFvn9yBmh bQVtz+mF8Eju/Fb8MkG6UCuDVA4Mp3t9Cy3tlXyyYivMg2WVI4k+nnGkFy+RhL7ZKjnPXr Ue7Bhs6EmRN2SAjciPnQx9tWODnV8EQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-630-AlsltSGgNSSYEsC6GR5Xxw-1; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:02:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: AlsltSGgNSSYEsC6GR5Xxw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB2E858F13; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.192.133]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24455492B0A; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:02:50 -0400 From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, agraf@csgraf.de Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] docs/devel suggestions for discussion Message-ID: References: <20221012121152.1179051-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1cFlWNBBsNCY/5Sa" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221012121152.1179051-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=stefanha@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" --1cFlWNBBsNCY/5Sa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 01:11:48PM +0100, Alex Benn=E9e wrote: > Hi, >=20 > This is an attempt to improve our processes documentation by: >=20 > - adding an explicit section on maintainers > - reducing the up-front verbiage in patch submission > - emphasising the importance to respectful reviews >=20 > I'm sure the language could be improved further so I humbly submit > this RFC for discussion. >=20 > Alex Benn=E9e (4): > docs/devel: add a maintainers section to development process > docs/devel: make language a little less code centric > docs/devel: simplify the minimal checklist > docs/devel: try and improve the language around patch review >=20 > docs/devel/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 + > docs/devel/index-process.rst | 1 + > docs/devel/maintainers.rst | 84 +++++++++++++++++++ > docs/devel/submitting-a-patch.rst | 101 +++++++++++++++-------- > docs/devel/submitting-a-pull-request.rst | 12 +-- > roms/qboot | 2 +- > 6 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 docs/devel/maintainers.rst >=20 > --=20 > 2.34.1 >=20 Modulo comments: Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --1cFlWNBBsNCY/5Sa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhpWov9P5fNqsNXdanKSrs4Grc8gFAmNG1xoACgkQnKSrs4Gr c8i3kwf/bs5ZFSmpdLoIB9VG6ZSUKlVpVH0GGk5xKlt83lnVPSlfy5TvDRgXCyBL yHLycNDO8AlfgkYT9lSNe4SimiSuu/0kJ4dgP1LWLth3/f8HRLg/1mOQGn0aQD8n QJDitaib6qUgTroX84o1J8sVeV1r2Yq7UZesil+u+LnPnpeqXr1losb+3tCJAuOe VD8sLy6cSYFXWObatTi4P5IkHYhI5goaCgU3b+bt1ia3Cv2XjgnGdtUlB5kNti14 5tMyU01+Br178rVIrxXlpTchSaMGELv7GWb1Yh9MQ5li/+xrJQX+Bzp9Bz/uMa9E yIbsVH4f4wcu9ZH68kWI84SGBtCV2A== =uRC/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1cFlWNBBsNCY/5Sa--