diff for duplicates of <Y0gfEn6487fMalI9@cmpxchg.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index b9637ab..981c486 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 09:36:34PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: -> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 1:12 PM Gra≈ævydas Ignotas <notasas-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: +> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 1:12 PM Gražvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com> wrote: > > -> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 9:16 PM Wei Wang <weiwan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: +> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 9:16 PM Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com> wrote: > > > -> > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:37 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: +> > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:37 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > + Eric and netdev > > > > -> > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:13 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> wrote: +> > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:13 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This is most likely a regression caused by this patch: > > > > > > > > > > commit 4b1327be9fe57443295ae86fe0fcf24a18469e9f -> > > > > Author: Wei Wang <weiwan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> +> > > > > Author: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com> > > > > > Date: Tue Aug 17 12:40:03 2021 -0700 > > > > > > > > > > net-memcg: pass in gfp_t mask to mem_cgroup_charge_skmem() @@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 09:36:34PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > > > > > force charging is needed through the presence or absence of > > > > > __GFP_NOFAIL. > > > > > -> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> -> > > > > Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> -> > > > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> +> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com> +> > > > > Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> +> > > > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> > > > > > > > > > > We never used to fail these allocations. Cgroups don't have a > > > > > kswapd-style watermark reclaimer, so the network relied on @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 09:36:34PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > > Hello everyone, we have a better understanding why the patch pointed > out by Johannes might have exposed this issue. See -> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221013041833.rhifxw4gqwk4ofi2-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org/. +> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221013041833.rhifxw4gqwk4ofi2@google.com/. Wow, that's super subtle! Nice sleuthing. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 793a41b..20f4994 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,36 +5,35 @@ "ref\0CAEA6p_BhAh6f_kAHEoEJ38nunY=c=4WqxhJQUjT+dCSAr_rm8g@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\0CANOLnONQaHXOp1z1rNum74N2b=Ub7t5NsGHqPdHUQL4+4YYEQg@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\0CALvZod6VaQXrs1x7ff=RRWWP+CgD0hQkTROfZ9XowQ_Zo3SO3Q@mail.gmail.com\0" - "ref\0CALvZod6VaQXrs1x7ff=RRWWP+CgD0hQkTROfZ9XowQ_Zo3SO3Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>\0" "Subject\0Re: UDP rx packet loss in a cgroup with a memory limit\0" "Date\0Thu, 13 Oct 2022 10:22:10 -0400\0" - "To\0Shakeel Butt <shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0Gra\305\276vydas Ignotas <notasas-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>" - Wei Wang <weiwan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> - Eric Dumazet <edumazet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> - netdev <netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> - Michal Hocko <mhocko-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org> - Roman Gushchin <guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org> - Linux MM <linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> - " Cgroups <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>\0" + "To\0Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>\0" + "Cc\0Gra\305\276vydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com>" + Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com> + Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> + netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org> + Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> + Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> + Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org> + " Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 09:36:34PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:\n" - "> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 1:12 PM Gra\342\211\210\303\246vydas Ignotas <notasas-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n" + "> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 1:12 PM Gra\305\276vydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com> wrote:\n" "> >\n" - "> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 9:16 PM Wei Wang <weiwan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n" + "> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 9:16 PM Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com> wrote:\n" "> > >\n" - "> > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:37 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n" + "> > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:37 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> wrote:\n" "> > > >\n" "> > > > + Eric and netdev\n" "> > > >\n" - "> > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:13 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n" + "> > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:13 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:\n" "> > > > >\n" "> > > > > This is most likely a regression caused by this patch:\n" "> > > > >\n" "> > > > > commit 4b1327be9fe57443295ae86fe0fcf24a18469e9f\n" - "> > > > > Author: Wei Wang <weiwan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> > > > > Author: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>\n" "> > > > > Date: Tue Aug 17 12:40:03 2021 -0700\n" "> > > > >\n" "> > > > > net-memcg: pass in gfp_t mask to mem_cgroup_charge_skmem()\n" @@ -49,9 +48,9 @@ "> > > > > force charging is needed through the presence or absence of\n" "> > > > > __GFP_NOFAIL.\n" "> > > > >\n" - "> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n" - "> > > > > Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n" - "> > > > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>\n" + "> > > > > Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>\n" + "> > > > > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>\n" "> > > > >\n" "> > > > > We never used to fail these allocations. Cgroups don't have a\n" "> > > > > kswapd-style watermark reclaimer, so the network relied on\n" @@ -103,7 +102,7 @@ "> \n" "> Hello everyone, we have a better understanding why the patch pointed\n" "> out by Johannes might have exposed this issue. See\n" - "> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221013041833.rhifxw4gqwk4ofi2-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org/.\n" + "> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221013041833.rhifxw4gqwk4ofi2@google.com/.\n" "\n" "Wow, that's super subtle! Nice sleuthing.\n" "\n" @@ -114,4 +113,4 @@ "\n" That sounds good to me. -0dd839b5ea8a77cf265fc110c2dba7e861d350088bc87542e42c3aca4a46fbf6 +83378b7d955afa0dad4009870e1f9f21fa04be519b782b24bb445825b557c115
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.