From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-cmos: Fix event handler registration ordering issue
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 23:34:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0iEaxyO8Jj6tKSC@mail.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gWG1qVzwSy19SSqFmxL7NZRf1pkLR_buPoyCcj4f0FLw@mail.gmail.com>
On 13/10/2022 13:38:31+0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:00 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 08:07:01PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Because acpi_install_fixed_event_handler() enables the event
> > > automatically on success, it is incorrect to call it before the
> > > handler routine passed to it is ready to handle events.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, the rtc-cmos driver does exactly the incorrect thing
> > > by calling cmos_wake_setup(), which passes rtc_handler() to
> > > acpi_install_fixed_event_handler(), before cmos_do_probe(), because
> > > rtc_handler() uses dev_get_drvdata() to get to the cmos object
> > > pointer and the driver data pointer is only populated in
> > > cmos_do_probe().
> > >
> > > This leads to a NULL pointer dereference in rtc_handler() on boot
> > > if the RTC fixed event happens to be active at the init time.
> > >
> > > To address this issue, change the initialization ordering of the
> > > driver so that cmos_wake_setup() is always called after a successful
> > > cmos_do_probe() call.
> > >
> > > While at it, change cmos_pnp_probe() to call cmos_do_probe() after
> > > the initial if () statement used for computing the IRQ argument to
> > > be passed to cmos_do_probe() which is cleaner than calling it in
> > > each branch of that if () (local variable "irq" can be of type int,
> > > because it is passed to that function as an argument of type int).
> > >
> > > Note that commit 6492fed7d8c9 ("rtc: rtc-cmos: Do not check
> > > ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0") caused this issue to affect a larger number
> > > of systems, because previously it only affected systems with
> > > ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 set, but it is present regardless of that
> > > commit.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 6492fed7d8c9 ("rtc: rtc-cmos: Do not check ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0")
> > > Fixes: a474aaedac99 ("rtc-cmos: move wake setup from ACPI glue into RTC driver")
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20221010141630.zfzi7mk7zvnmclzy@techsingularity.net/
> > > Reported-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >
> > Yep, I blew it with a474aaedac99, sorry about that.
> >
> > Possibly could call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() instead of
> > from cmos_pnp_probe() and cmos_platform_probe()?
>
> Sounds good.
>
> I would prefer to send a separate patch for this on top of the
> $subject one, unless Alexandre wants me to do it all in one go.
>
> Alexandre, what's your preference here? Or would you prefer if I
> pushed this forward?
>
I applied your patch, feel free to improve on top of that ;)
> > Then there would be a single call site and it would be closer to the actual dependency on
> > dev_set_drvdata(). Either way is fine with me.
>
> OK
>
> > Unrelated, but I happened to notice that pnp_irq() returns -1 for
> > failure, and this note suggests that possibly returning 0 would be
> > better:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wg2Pkb9kbfbstbB91AJA2SF6cySbsgHG-iQMq56j3VTcA@mail.gmail.com
>
> Probably.
>
> In that case, though, it would be prudent to also explicitly discard
> IRQ resources where start is equal to 0.
>
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> > > +++ linux-pm/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
> > > @@ -1352,10 +1352,10 @@ static void cmos_check_acpi_rtc_status(s
> > >
> > > static int cmos_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev *pnp, const struct pnp_device_id *id)
> > > {
> > > - cmos_wake_setup(&pnp->dev);
> > > + int irq, ret;
> > >
> > > if (pnp_port_start(pnp, 0) == 0x70 && !pnp_irq_valid(pnp, 0)) {
> > > - unsigned int irq = 0;
> > > + irq = 0;
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > > /* Some machines contain a PNP entry for the RTC, but
> > > * don't define the IRQ. It should always be safe to
> > > @@ -1364,13 +1364,17 @@ static int cmos_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev
> > > if (nr_legacy_irqs())
> > > irq = RTC_IRQ;
> > > #endif
> > > - return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev,
> > > - pnp_get_resource(pnp, IORESOURCE_IO, 0), irq);
> > > } else {
> > > - return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev,
> > > - pnp_get_resource(pnp, IORESOURCE_IO, 0),
> > > - pnp_irq(pnp, 0));
> > > + irq = pnp_irq(pnp, 0);
> > > }
> > > +
> > > + ret = cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev, pnp_get_resource(pnp, IORESOURCE_IO, 0), irq);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + cmos_wake_setup(&pnp->dev);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void cmos_pnp_remove(struct pnp_dev *pnp)
> > > @@ -1454,10 +1458,9 @@ static inline void cmos_of_init(struct p
> > > static int __init cmos_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > {
> > > struct resource *resource;
> > > - int irq;
> > > + int irq, ret;
> > >
> > > cmos_of_init(pdev);
> > > - cmos_wake_setup(&pdev->dev);
> > >
> > > if (RTC_IOMAPPED)
> > > resource = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IO, 0);
> > > @@ -1467,7 +1470,13 @@ static int __init cmos_platform_probe(st
> > > if (irq < 0)
> > > irq = -1;
> > >
> > > - return cmos_do_probe(&pdev->dev, resource, irq);
> > > + ret = cmos_do_probe(&pdev->dev, resource, irq);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + cmos_wake_setup(&pdev->dev);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int cmos_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >
> > >
> > >
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-13 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-12 18:07 [PATCH] rtc: rtc-cmos: Fix event handler registration ordering issue Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-12 18:11 ` Mel Gorman
2022-10-12 20:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-10-13 11:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-13 21:34 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2022-10-18 16:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-13 21:33 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y0iEaxyO8Jj6tKSC@mail.local \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.