All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 28/28] mfd: intel-lpss: Remove #ifdef guards for PM related functions
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:43:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1/tMMEVA5inNyw/@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <J6IMKR.EVFG2BDFUG8Q1@crapouillou.net>

On Mon, 31 Oct 2022, Paul Cercueil wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Le lun. 31 oct. 2022 à 08:03:25 -0700, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> a écrit :
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 02:59:37PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >  On Sun, 23 Oct 2022, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > 
> > >  > Hi Paul,
> > >  >
> > >  > I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> > >  >
> > >  > [auto build test ERROR on lee-mfd/for-mfd-next]
> > >  > [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.1-rc1 next-20221021]
> > >  > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a
> > > note.
> > >  > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as
> > > documented in
> > >  > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> > >  >
> > >  > url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Paul-Cercueil/mfd-Remove-ifdef-guards-for-PM-functions/20221023-175612
> > >  > base:
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git
> > > for-mfd-next
> > >  > patch link:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221023094852.8035-29-paul%40crapouillou.net
> > >  > patch subject: [PATCH v3 28/28] mfd: intel-lpss: Remove #ifdef
> > > guards for PM related functions
> > >  > config: i386-randconfig-a013
> > >  > compiler: clang version 14.0.6
> > > (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
> > > f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
> > >  > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > >  >         wget
> > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross
> > > -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > >  >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > >  >         # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/873891d1ee1634da028bb74d0e7cfa5d77b2f157
> > >  >         git remote add linux-review
> > > https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> > >  >         git fetch --no-tags linux-review
> > > Paul-Cercueil/mfd-Remove-ifdef-guards-for-PM-functions/20221023-175612
> > >  >         git checkout 873891d1ee1634da028bb74d0e7cfa5d77b2f157
> > >  >         # save the config file
> > >  >         mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> > >  >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang
> > > make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/mfd/
> > >  >
> > >  > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> > >  > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > >  >
> > >  > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > >  >
> > >  > >> drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c:75:8: error: type specifier
> > > missing, defaults to 'int' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-int]
> > >  >    static INTEL_LPSS_PM_OPS(intel_lpss_pci_pm_ops);
> > >  >    ~~~~~~ ^
> > >  > >> drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c:75:26: error: a parameter list
> > > without types is only allowed in a function definition
> > >  >    static INTEL_LPSS_PM_OPS(intel_lpss_pci_pm_ops);
> > >  >                             ^
> > >  >    2 errors generated.
> > > 
> > >  Is this a valid error?
> > 
> > Yes, because this change removes the definition of INTEL_LPSS_PM_OPS in
> > intel-lpss.h.
> 
> The "static INTEL_LPSS_PM_OPS(intel_lpss_pci_pm_ops)" is dead code; just
> removing this line should be enough to make it work.
> 
> I'll V2 when I find some time.

Thanks.

I'll put this set on hold for v2.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-31 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-23  9:48 [PATCH v3 00/28] mfd: Remove #ifdef guards for PM functions Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 01/28] mfd: 88pm80x: Remove #ifdef guards for PM related functions Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 02/28] mfd: aat2870: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 03/28] mfd: adp5520: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 04/28] mfd: max8925-i2c: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 05/28] mfd: mt6397-irq: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 06/28] mfd: pcf50633: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 07/28] mfd: rc5t583-irq: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 08/28] mfd: stpmic1: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 09/28] mfd: ucb1x00: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 10/28] mfd: 88pm860x: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 11/28] mfd: mcp-sa11x0: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 12/28] mfd: sec: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 13/28] mfd: sm501: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 14/28] mfd: tc6387xb: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 15/28] mfd: tps6586x: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 16/28] mfd: wm8994: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 17/28] mfd: max77620: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 18/28] mfd: t7l66xb: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 19/28] mfd: arizona: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 20/28] mfd: max14577: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 21/28] mfd: max77686: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 22/28] mfd: motorola-cpcap: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 23/28] mfd: sprd-sc27xx: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 24/28] mfd: stmfx: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 25/28] mfd: stmpe: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48   ` Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 26/28] mfd: tc3589x: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 27/28] mfd: tc6393xb: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 28/28] mfd: intel-lpss: " Paul Cercueil
2022-10-23 12:55   ` kernel test robot
2022-10-31 14:59     ` Lee Jones
2022-10-31 15:03       ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-10-31 15:11         ` Paul Cercueil
2022-10-31 15:43           ` Lee Jones [this message]
2022-10-31 15:53             ` Paul Cercueil
2022-11-01 10:27               ` Lee Jones
2022-11-07  9:44 ` [PATCH v3 00/28] mfd: Remove #ifdef guards for PM functions Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1/tMMEVA5inNyw/@google.com \
    --to=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.