All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Kandpal, Suraj" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: "Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Removing one use macro
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:00:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1EcI7NwED6SBFZG@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR11MB17419A6372C3C39271D84FF8E32A9@MWHPR11MB1741.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:48:20AM +0000, Kandpal, Suraj wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > > index 2af4a1925063..c803330a276d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
> > > @@ -469,10 +469,6 @@ enum hpd_pin {
> > >  	list_for_each_entry((intel_encoder), &(dev)-
> > >mode_config.encoder_list, base.head) \
> > >  		for_each_if((intel_encoder)->base.crtc == (__crtc))
> > >
> > > -#define for_each_connector_on_encoder(dev, __encoder,
> > intel_connector) \
> > > -	list_for_each_entry((intel_connector), &(dev)-
> > >mode_config.connector_list, base.head) \
> > > -		for_each_if((intel_connector)->base.encoder ==
> > (__encoder))
> > > -
> > >  #define for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state(__state, plane,
> > old_plane_state, __i) \
> > >  	for ((__i) = 0; \
> > >  	     (__i) < (__state)->base.dev->mode_config.num_total_plane && \
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> > > index cbfabd58b75a..31ce4ac4059c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> > > @@ -205,12 +205,22 @@ static bool intel_crtc_has_encoders(struct
> > > intel_crtc *crtc)
> > >
> > >  static struct intel_connector *intel_encoder_find_connector(struct
> > > intel_encoder *encoder)  {
> > > -	struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
> > > +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> > >  	struct intel_connector *connector;
> > > +	struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
> > > +	bool found_connector = false;
> > >
> > > -	for_each_connector_on_encoder(dev, &encoder->base, connector)
> > > -		return connector;
> > > +	drm_connector_list_iter_begin(&i915->drm, &conn_iter);
> > > +		for_each_intel_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
> > 
> > Bogus indentation.
> > 
> Hi Ville,
> 
> Will remove the bogus indentation.
> 
> > > +			if (&encoder->base == connector->base.encoder) {
> > 
> > Still using the legacy pointers so not great. But I suppse it's still better than
> > before because the horrors are now better contained in this file rather than
> > in an official looking macro.
> 
> Any suggestion on how I could make this better or should I go ahead with this
> approach for now

It's fine for now. Stopping the legacy pointer usage involved
a lot of work.

> 
> > 
> > I do have some work in some old branch to get rid of the legacy pointer
> > crap, but it'll probably need a rewrite by now...
> > 
> > > +				found_connector = true;
> > > +				break;
> > > +			}
> > > +	}
> > > +	drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);
> > >
> > > +	if (found_connector)
> > 
> > I would make that a pointer to the connector, then you can just return it
> > directly. And as a bonus we don't use the loop iterator outside the loop
> > anymore, which is a bit questionable in general.
> 
> Ah got it .
> 
> Regards,
> Suraj Kandpal
> 
> > 
> > > +		return connector;
> > >  	return NULL;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > 
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

      reply	other threads:[~2022-10-20 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-20  9:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/1] Removing Connector iterator macro Suraj Kandpal
2022-10-20  9:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Removing one use macro Suraj Kandpal
2022-10-20  9:28   ` Murthy, Arun R
2022-10-20  9:37   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-10-20  9:48     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2022-10-20 10:00       ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1EcI7NwED6SBFZG@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.