From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: move the srcu_struct used for quiescing to the tagset
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:41:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1H4soZ///Wi1sov@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221020105608.1581940-4-hch@lst.de>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:56:03PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> All I/O submissions have fairly similar latencies, and a tagset-wide
> quiesce is a fairly common operation. Becuase there are a lot less
> tagsets there is also no need for the variable size allocation trick.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 27 +++++----------------------
> block/blk-mq.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> block/blk-mq.h | 14 +++++++-------
> block/blk-sysfs.c | 9 ++-------
> block/blk.h | 9 +--------
> block/genhd.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 4 ++++
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 9 ---------
> 8 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
q->tag_set is supposed to be live when calling blk_mq_quiesce_queue
and blk_mq_unquiesce_queue, especially del_gendisk() quieses request
queue, so looks fine:
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-20 10:56 per-tagset SRCU struct and quiesce Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/8] block: set the disk capacity to 0 in blk_mark_disk_dead Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 13:16 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-21 1:09 ` Ming Lei
2022-10-21 13:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-21 1:53 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-21 6:49 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-21 13:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-21 21:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-20 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: skip non-mq queues in blk_mq_quiesce_queue Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 13:16 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-21 1:13 ` Ming Lei
2022-10-21 13:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-21 15:08 ` Ming Lei
2022-10-21 2:47 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-21 3:16 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-21 6:49 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-20 10:56 ` [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: move the srcu_struct used for quiescing to the tagset Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 13:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-20 17:26 ` Keith Busch
2022-10-21 13:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-21 1:41 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-10-21 2:49 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-21 6:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-21 7:16 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-21 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 10:56 ` [PATCH 4/8] blk-mq: pass a tagset to blk_mq_wait_quiesce_done Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 13:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-21 1:46 ` Ming Lei
2022-10-21 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-21 2:49 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-21 6:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-21 21:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-20 10:56 ` [PATCH 5/8] blk-mq: add tagset quiesce interface Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 13:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-21 1:53 ` Ming Lei
2022-10-21 2:49 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-21 6:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-21 21:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-24 1:57 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-24 13:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-25 1:38 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-20 10:56 ` [PATCH 6/8] nvme: move the NS_DEAD flag to the controller Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 13:30 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-21 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-24 8:43 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-24 8:50 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-21 2:49 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-21 6:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-20 10:56 ` [PATCH 7/8] nvme: remove nvme_set_queue_dying Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 13:10 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-21 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-24 8:48 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-21 2:50 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-21 6:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-20 10:56 ` [PATCH 8/8] nvme: use blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-20 13:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-21 2:50 ` Chao Leng
2022-10-21 6:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-10-20 13:16 ` per-tagset SRCU struct and quiesce Sagi Grimberg
2022-10-21 18:06 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1H4soZ///Wi1sov@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.