From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, yisen.zhuang@huawei.com,
salil.mehta@huawei.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: hns: fix possible memory leak in hnae_ae_register()
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 11:04:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1T1fxYXAICqHmLi@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <576a5bf8-8317-fe35-26c9-749cc8cf4fd6@huawei.com>
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:01:47AM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>
> On 2022/10/21 3:43, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 15:48:38 +0800 Yang Yingliang wrote:
> > > On 2022/10/20 8:28, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:58:38 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > The change itself is ok.
> > > > Also the .release function is empty which is another bad smell?
> > > The upper device (struct dsaf_device *dsaf_dev) is allocated by
> > > devm_kzalloc(), so it's no need to free it in ->release().
> > Nah ah. devm_* is just for objects which tie their lifetime naturally
> > to the lifetime of the driver instance, IOW the device ->priv.
> >
> > struct device allocated by the driver is not tied to that, it's
> > a properly referenced object. I don't think that just because
> > the driver that allocated it got ->remove()d you're safe to free
> > allocated struct devices.
> In this driver, I see the 'cls_dev' is used as driver data and it
> unregistered
> before got removed to free the device memory, I think it's safe for now.
Empty release means reference counting doesn't really count anything.
According to your reply, cls_dev is protected from outside and its life
time bounded to upper level.
The thing is that you was expected to create that cls_dev when you did
device_initalization and release it with not-empty release function.
Thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Yang
> > .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-23 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 12:24 [PATCH net] net: hns: fix possible memory leak in hnae_ae_register() Yang Yingliang
2022-10-18 12:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-10-20 0:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-20 7:48 ` Yang Yingliang
2022-10-20 19:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-21 3:01 ` Yang Yingliang
2022-10-23 8:04 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-10-20 7:45 ` Yang Yingliang
2022-10-23 7:59 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-10-20 0:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1T1fxYXAICqHmLi@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=salil.mehta@huawei.com \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=yisen.zhuang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.