From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yu-Chien Peter Lin Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 08:43:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add Andes AE350 fdt driver support In-Reply-To: References: <20221014003252.17765-1-peterlin@andestech.com> Message-ID: List-Id: To: opensbi@lists.infradead.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 06:13:48PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 5:54 PM Yu-Chien Peter Lin > wrote: > > > > > > > Applied this series to the riscv/opensbi repo. > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts on using the generic platform ? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Anup > > > > > > > > Hi Anup, > > > > > > > > The FW_TEXT_START on AE350 is different from generic platform. > > > > Will it become a configuration? > > > > > > The generic platform has FW_PIC enabled so you can load and > > > run generic firmwares from any address. > > > > > > > I think we would keep the platform specific files in andes/ae350 > > > > until we have to refactor the duplicate code. > > > > > > You can add platform specific overrides to generic platforms which > > > are selected based on compatible string in the root DT node. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Anup > > > > Hi Anup, > > > > We're considering using generic platform, but I don't find any > > vendor_ext_provider is implemented as a platform_override hook, > > does it mean we need to drop it if we move to generic platform? > > vendor_ext_provider() is available in platform_override of generic > platform. > > Please check the latest OpenSBI sources. > > Regards, > Anup > Hi Anup, Sorry, I know there is vendor_ext_provider in platform_override, except AE350, no other platforms actually have such hook in their platform specific files, so I was wondering if the current acceptance policy won't let us keep that function even in platform/andes/ae350. Thanks, Peter Lin