From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Soha Jin <soha@lohu.info>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wende Tan <twd2.me@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform: use fwnode_irq_get_byname instead of of_irq_get_byname to get irq
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:52:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y24NPPF+6CM6b/d2@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DS0PR05MB95440932459F31AA76618A75DA009@DS0PR05MB9544.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 08:30:46AM +0000, Soha Jin wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Soha Jin <soha@lohu.info>
> > Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2022 12:41 AM
> >
> > Not only platform devices described by OF have named interrupts, but
> > devices described by ACPI also have named interrupts. The fwnode is an
> > abstraction to different standards, and using fwnode_irq_get_byname can
> > support more devices.
> >
> > Moreover, when CONFIG_OF_IRQ is not enabled, there will be a stub method
> > always returning 0, the if statement can be removed safely.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Soha Jin <soha@lohu.info>
> > Tested-by: Wende Tan <twd2.me@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/platform.c | 8 +++-----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c index
> > 51bb2289865c..6cd7fd478c5f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > @@ -441,11 +441,9 @@ static int __platform_get_irq_byname(struct
> > platform_device *dev,
> > struct resource *r;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_IRQ) && dev->dev.of_node) {
> > - ret = of_irq_get_byname(dev->dev.of_node, name);
> > - if (ret > 0 || ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > + ret = fwnode_irq_get_byname(dev_fwnode(&dev->dev), name);
> > + if (ret > 0 || ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + return ret;
> >
> > r = platform_get_resource_byname(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, name);
> > if (r) {
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
>
> Hello Greg,
>
> I noticed the original patch is merged into -next branch, but as I said in
> the mail yesterday (maybe you did not see it), I already composed a v2
> patch 2 weeks ago. Except the formatting fix, this patch also removed a
> useless if-branch.
>
> Are there any chance to correct this mistake?
Please submit a fixup patch, sorry, I can't rebase that branch now.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-11 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-28 16:41 [PATCH v2] platform: use fwnode_irq_get_byname instead of of_irq_get_byname to get irq Soha Jin
2022-11-11 8:30 ` Soha Jin
2022-11-11 8:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-11-11 9:42 ` Soha Jin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y24NPPF+6CM6b/d2@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=soha@lohu.info \
--cc=twd2.me@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.