All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] KVM: x86: Omit PMU MSRs from KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST if !enable_pmu
@ 2022-11-03 19:17 Aaron Lewis
  2022-11-03 20:44 ` Jim Mattson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Lewis @ 2022-11-03 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm; +Cc: pbonzini, jmattson, seanjc, Aaron Lewis

When the PMU is disabled, don't bother sharing the PMU MSRs with
userspace through KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST.  Instead, filter them out so
userspace doesn't have to keep track of them.

Note that 'enable_pmu' is read-only, so userspace has no control over
whether the PMU MSRs are included in the list or not.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 521b433f978c..19bc42a6946d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -7042,13 +7042,20 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
 				continue;
 			break;
 		case MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 ... MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 + 17:
-			if (msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 >=
-			    min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp))
+			if ((msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 >=
+			    min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp)) ||
+			    !enable_pmu)
 				continue;
 			break;
 		case MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 ... MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + 17:
-			if (msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 >=
-			    min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp))
+			if ((msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 >=
+			    min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp)) ||
+			    !enable_pmu)
+				continue;
+			break;
+		case MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 ... MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5:
+		case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 ... MSR_K7_PERFCTR3:
+			if (!enable_pmu)
 				continue;
 			break;
 		case MSR_IA32_XFD:
-- 
2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Omit PMU MSRs from KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST if !enable_pmu
  2022-11-03 19:17 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Omit PMU MSRs from KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST if !enable_pmu Aaron Lewis
@ 2022-11-03 20:44 ` Jim Mattson
  2022-11-03 22:29   ` Sean Christopherson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jim Mattson @ 2022-11-03 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aaron Lewis; +Cc: kvm, pbonzini, seanjc, Like Xu

On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:18 PM Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> wrote:
>
> When the PMU is disabled, don't bother sharing the PMU MSRs with
> userspace through KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST.  Instead, filter them out so
> userspace doesn't have to keep track of them.
>
> Note that 'enable_pmu' is read-only, so userspace has no control over
> whether the PMU MSRs are included in the list or not.
>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 521b433f978c..19bc42a6946d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -7042,13 +7042,20 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
>                                 continue;
>                         break;
>                 case MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 ... MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 + 17:
> -                       if (msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 >=
> -                           min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp))
> +                       if ((msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 >=
> +                           min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp)) ||
> +                           !enable_pmu)
>                                 continue;
>                         break;
>                 case MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 ... MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + 17:
> -                       if (msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 >=
> -                           min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp))
> +                       if ((msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 >=
> +                           min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp)) ||
> +                           !enable_pmu)
> +                               continue;
> +                       break;
> +               case MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 ... MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5:
> +               case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 ... MSR_K7_PERFCTR3:
> +                       if (!enable_pmu)
>                                 continue;
>                         break;
>                 case MSR_IA32_XFD:

I think you've missed a bunch:

MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0, MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR1,
MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0 + 2,
MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS,
MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL,
MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, MSR_PEBS_DATA_CFG

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Omit PMU MSRs from KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST if !enable_pmu
  2022-11-03 20:44 ` Jim Mattson
@ 2022-11-03 22:29   ` Sean Christopherson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2022-11-03 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jim Mattson; +Cc: Aaron Lewis, kvm, pbonzini, Like Xu

On Thu, Nov 03, 2022, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:18 PM Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > When the PMU is disabled, don't bother sharing the PMU MSRs with
> > userspace through KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST.  Instead, filter them out so
> > userspace doesn't have to keep track of them.
> >
> > Note that 'enable_pmu' is read-only, so userspace has no control over
> > whether the PMU MSRs are included in the list or not.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 521b433f978c..19bc42a6946d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -7042,13 +7042,20 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
> >                                 continue;
> >                         break;
> >                 case MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 ... MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 + 17:
> > -                       if (msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 >=
> > -                           min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp))
> > +                       if ((msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_PERFCTR0 >=
> > +                           min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp)) ||
> > +                           !enable_pmu)
> >                                 continue;
> >                         break;
> >                 case MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 ... MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 + 17:
> > -                       if (msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 >=
> > -                           min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp))
> > +                       if ((msrs_to_save_all[i] - MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL0 >=
> > +                           min(INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp)) ||
> > +                           !enable_pmu)
> > +                               continue;
> > +                       break;
> > +               case MSR_F15H_PERF_CTL0 ... MSR_F15H_PERF_CTR5:
> > +               case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0 ... MSR_K7_PERFCTR3:
> > +                       if (!enable_pmu)
> >                                 continue;
> >                         break;
> >                 case MSR_IA32_XFD:
> 
> I think you've missed a bunch:
> 
> MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0, MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR1,
> MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR0 + 2,
> MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS,
> MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL,
> MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, MSR_PEBS_DATA_CFG

Ooh, better idea!  Assuming this isn't a pressing concern, what about organizing
the MSR lists into sublists, kinda like what I proposed for VMX MSRs[*], but do
it in a generic way.  E.g. have all the PMU MSRs in a sub-list so that they can
be skipped as a group instead of needing to add a bunch of enable_pmu checks.

[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220805172945.35412-3-seanjc@google.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-03 22:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-03 19:17 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Omit PMU MSRs from KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST if !enable_pmu Aaron Lewis
2022-11-03 20:44 ` Jim Mattson
2022-11-03 22:29   ` Sean Christopherson

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.