From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
Cc: outreachy@lists.linux.dev, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Simplify underutilized 2D array to 1D array
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 09:36:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2YghalNBdtaAQdr@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4fb8d9783553d15a58e774d7137519d46e58ee3a.1667586648.git.drv@mailo.com>
On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 12:04:56AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> Member variable "Value" of structure iqk_matrix_regs_setting is
> declared to be a 2D array of [3][IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM] grid. However
> the primary index of this array is only used for index 0, the other
> two elements are never used. Simplify this array to a one dimension
> degree. The resultant code is simpler and is easy to maintain.
>
> Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c
> index a52748f7b56e..9317a4462c02 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/HalPhyRf_8723B.c
> @@ -244,8 +244,8 @@ void ODM_TxPwrTrackSetPwr_8723B(
> Final_CCK_Swing_Index = 0;
>
> setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, Final_OFDM_Swing_Index, RFPath,
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
>
> setCCKFilterCoefficient(pDM_Odm, Final_CCK_Swing_Index);
>
> @@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ void ODM_TxPwrTrackSetPwr_8723B(
> pDM_Odm->Remnant_OFDMSwingIdx[RFPath] = Final_OFDM_Swing_Index - PwrTrackingLimit_OFDM;
>
> setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, PwrTrackingLimit_OFDM, RFPath,
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
>
> pDM_Odm->Modify_TxAGC_Flag_PathA = true;
> PHY_SetTxPowerIndexByRateSection(Adapter, RFPath, pHalData->CurrentChannel, OFDM);
> @@ -267,16 +267,16 @@ void ODM_TxPwrTrackSetPwr_8723B(
> pDM_Odm->Remnant_OFDMSwingIdx[RFPath] = Final_OFDM_Swing_Index;
>
> setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, 0, RFPath,
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
>
> pDM_Odm->Modify_TxAGC_Flag_PathA = true;
> PHY_SetTxPowerIndexByRateSection(Adapter, RFPath, pHalData->CurrentChannel, OFDM);
> PHY_SetTxPowerIndexByRateSection(Adapter, RFPath, pHalData->CurrentChannel, HT_MCS0_MCS7);
> } else {
> setIqkMatrix_8723B(pDM_Odm, Final_OFDM_Swing_Index, RFPath,
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][0],
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0][1]);
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[0],
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[ChannelMappedIndex].Value[1]);
>
> if (pDM_Odm->Modify_TxAGC_Flag_PathA) { /* If TxAGC has changed, reset TxAGC again */
> pDM_Odm->Remnant_OFDMSwingIdx[RFPath] = 0;
> @@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@ void PHY_IQCalibrate_8723B(
> /* by sherry 20120321 */
> if (final_candidate < 4) {
> for (i = 0; i < IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM; i++)
> - pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[0].Value[0][i] = result[final_candidate][i];
> + pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[0].Value[i] = result[final_candidate][i];
> pDM_Odm->RFCalibrateInfo.IQKMatrixRegSetting[0].bIQKDone = true;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> index fe9782d2d4fd..e16a769850c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm.h
> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ enum odm_type_alna_e { /* tag_ODM_TYPE_ALNA_Definition */
>
> struct iqk_matrix_regs_setting { /* _IQK_MATRIX_REGS_SETTING */
> bool bIQKDone;
> - s32 Value[3][IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM];
> + s32 Value[IQK_Matrix_REG_NUM];
This field is used to store values (as your above patch shows), but
where is it actually used? Are you sure it is needed at all?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-05 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 18:34 [PATCH 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: struct iqk_matrix_regs_setting cleanup Deepak R Varma
2022-11-04 18:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Simplify underutilized 2D array to 1D array Deepak R Varma
2022-11-05 8:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-11-05 8:44 ` Deepak R Varma
2022-11-05 9:17 ` Deepak R Varma
2022-11-08 15:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-11-08 17:49 ` Deepak R Varma
2022-11-04 18:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Remove unused member variable Deepak R Varma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2YghalNBdtaAQdr@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=drv@mailo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.