From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
eric.auger@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 08/11] vfio: Refactor vfio_device_first_open() and _last_close()
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 10:56:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3+GHbf4EkvyqukE@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221124122702.26507-9-yi.l.liu@intel.com>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 04:26:59AM -0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> + kvm = vfio_device_get_group_kvm(device);
> + if (!kvm) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_unuse_iommu;
> + }
A null kvm is not an error.
And looking at this along with following cdev patch, I think this
organization is cleaner. Make it so the caller of the vfio_device_open
does most of the group/device differences. We already have different
call chains. keep the iommfd code in vfio_main.c's functions.
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
index 3a69839c65ff75..9b511055150cec 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -609,61 +609,32 @@ void vfio_device_group_unregister(struct vfio_device *device)
int vfio_device_group_use_iommu(struct vfio_device *device)
{
+ struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
int ret = 0;
- /*
- * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock. If the
- * device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release it
- * during close_device.
- */
- mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
- if (!vfio_group_has_iommu(device->group)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
+ lockdep_assert_held(&group->group_lock);
- if (device->group->container) {
- ret = vfio_group_use_container(device->group);
- if (ret)
- goto out_unlock;
- vfio_device_container_register(device);
- } else if (device->group->iommufd) {
- ret = vfio_iommufd_bind(device, device->group->iommufd);
- }
+ if (WARN_ON(!group->container))
+ return -EINVAL;
-out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
- return ret;
+ ret = vfio_group_use_container(group);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ vfio_device_container_register(device);
+ return 0;
}
void vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(struct vfio_device *device)
-{
- mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
- if (device->group->container) {
- vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
- vfio_group_unuse_container(device->group);
- } else if (device->group->iommufd) {
- vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
- }
- mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
-}
-
-struct kvm *vfio_device_get_group_kvm(struct vfio_device *device)
{
struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
- mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
- if (!group->kvm) {
- mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
- return NULL;
- }
- /* group_lock is released in the vfio_group_put_kvm() */
- return group->kvm;
-}
+ lockdep_assert_held(&group->group_lock);
-void vfio_device_put_group_kvm(struct vfio_device *device)
-{
- mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
+ if (WARN_ON(!group->container))
+ return;
+
+ vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
+ vfio_group_unuse_container(group);
}
/**
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 3108e92a5cb20b..f9386a34d584e2 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -364,9 +364,9 @@ static bool vfio_assert_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
return !WARN_ON_ONCE(!READ_ONCE(device->open_count));
}
-static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device)
+static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd, struct kvm *kvm)
{
- struct kvm *kvm;
int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
@@ -374,54 +374,56 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device)
if (!try_module_get(device->dev->driver->owner))
return -ENODEV;
- ret = vfio_device_group_use_iommu(device);
+ if (iommufd)
+ ret = vfio_iommufd_bind(device, iommufd);
+ else
+ ret = vfio_device_group_use_iommu(device);
if (ret)
goto err_module_put;
- kvm = vfio_device_get_group_kvm(device);
- if (!kvm) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto err_unuse_iommu;
- }
-
device->kvm = kvm;
if (device->ops->open_device) {
ret = device->ops->open_device(device);
if (ret)
- goto err_container;
+ goto err_unuse_iommu;
}
- vfio_device_put_group_kvm(device);
return 0;
-err_container:
- device->kvm = NULL;
- vfio_device_put_group_kvm(device);
err_unuse_iommu:
- vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(device);
+ if (iommufd)
+ vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
+ else
+ vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(device);
err_module_put:
module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
+ device->kvm = NULL;
return ret;
}
-static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device)
+static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device,
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
if (device->ops->close_device)
device->ops->close_device(device);
device->kvm = NULL;
- vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(device);
+ if (iommufd)
+ vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
+ else
+ vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(device);
module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
}
-static int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
+static int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device,
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd, struct kvm *kvm)
{
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
device->open_count++;
if (device->open_count == 1) {
- ret = vfio_device_first_open(device);
+ ret = vfio_device_first_open(device, iommufd, kvm);
if (ret)
device->open_count--;
}
@@ -430,22 +432,53 @@ static int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
return ret;
}
-static void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device)
+static void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
{
mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
vfio_assert_device_open(device);
if (device->open_count == 1)
- vfio_device_last_close(device);
+ vfio_device_last_close(device, iommufd);
device->open_count--;
mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
}
+static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
+ if (!vfio_group_has_iommu(device->group)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock. If the
+ * device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release it
+ * during close_device.
+ */
+ ret = vfio_device_open(device, device->group->iommufd,
+ device->group->kvm);
+
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+void vfio_device_close_group(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
+ vfio_device_close(device, device->group->iommufd);
+ mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
+}
+
struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
{
struct file *filep;
int ret;
- ret = vfio_device_open(device);
+ ret = vfio_device_group_open(device);
if (ret)
goto err_out;
@@ -474,7 +507,7 @@ struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
return filep;
err_close_device:
- vfio_device_close(device);
+ vfio_device_group_close(device), device->group->iommufd;
err_out:
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
@@ -519,7 +552,7 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
{
struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
- vfio_device_close(device);
+ vfio_device_close_group(device);
vfio_device_put_registration(device);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-24 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-24 12:26 [RFC v2 00/11] Move group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
2022-11-24 12:26 ` [RFC v2 01/11] vfio: Simplify vfio_create_group() Yi Liu
2022-11-28 7:57 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-24 12:26 ` [RFC v2 02/11] vfio: Move the sanity check of the group to vfio_create_group() Yi Liu
2022-11-28 8:05 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-24 12:26 ` [RFC v2 03/11] vfio: Set device->group in helper function Yi Liu
2022-11-24 13:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-24 13:50 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-28 8:08 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-28 9:17 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-29 2:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-29 13:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-30 7:09 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-24 12:26 ` [RFC v2 04/11] vfio: Wrap group codes to be helpers for __vfio_register_dev() and unregister Yi Liu
2022-11-28 8:11 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-28 9:17 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-24 12:26 ` [RFC v2 05/11] vfio: Make vfio_device_open() group agnostic Yi Liu
2022-11-28 8:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-28 9:19 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-01 7:08 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-01 12:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-24 12:26 ` [RFC v2 06/11] vfio: Move device open/close code to be helpfers Yi Liu
2022-11-28 8:21 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-28 9:27 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-24 12:26 ` [RFC v2 07/11] vfio: Swap order of vfio_device_container_register() and open_device() Yi Liu
2022-11-28 8:27 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-28 9:28 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-24 12:26 ` [RFC v2 08/11] vfio: Refactor vfio_device_first_open() and _last_close() Yi Liu
2022-11-24 14:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-11-25 8:57 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-25 12:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-25 14:06 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-25 14:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-25 14:33 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-28 8:31 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-24 12:27 ` [RFC v2 09/11] vfio: Wrap vfio group module init/clean code into helpers Yi Liu
2022-11-28 8:36 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-24 12:27 ` [RFC v2 10/11] vfio: Refactor dma APIs for emulated devices Yi Liu
2022-11-24 22:05 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-28 8:42 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-11-24 12:27 ` [RFC v2 11/11] vfio: Move vfio group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
2022-11-24 14:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-11-25 8:45 ` Yi Liu
2022-11-28 21:21 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3+GHbf4EkvyqukE@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.