From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net (relay10.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C7748ACC; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62A10240008; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:43:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1668544986; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=N5Vmt4QAczJ9Dte4RG8nDb1IzzGHMYJ91kRw/ZSD6Vg=; b=Sw62OnpCCOKvF2pKKFAKfoZfg95A24FBw6tcNsqGlqY23fiA/w4JFxTPW1VSGAIwqI6t/w ftR3GvAQGZntGQf35lfCbMnJinkO3g7knyHIRpviGTXrvXz0UHK5Iw0ffxDpDVGaRX+ctK Xg1mopuAn4jcnJmJ0LD0WNCcbszvftfXtMbBitV50GQIhHDskMpP0NNQMoj8pcXq0IcUYv B1+FhWx7YX94p2zY7WgMyhD7GyQLebmY5ydkVgpfHkd9RIHox4QXD5lRUM37RV+yQyjRnS /HDwcsVC1k7iTHMHZTmYs85FMEIPXI9ZwDtqZx2a5YjS2GaCsbKa9MiXzXEcmA== Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:43:06 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , tools@linux.kernel.org, users@linux.kernel.org Subject: Re: b4 patch subject issue Message-ID: References: <20221115202851.swjefy4auefrubrj@nitro.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20221115202851.swjefy4auefrubrj@nitro.local> On 15/11/2022 15:28:51-0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 09:17:57PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > Hello Konstantin, > > > > I found a small issue in how b4 handles path subjects: > > > > linux$ b4 shazam -tsl 5640233.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher > > ... > > > [PATCH v2 3/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Eliminate forward declarations of some functions > > + Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui (✓ DKIM/intel.com) > > + Tested-by: Zhang Rui (✓ DKIM/intel.com) > > + Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko (✓ DKIM/intel.com) > > + Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/13157911.uLZWGnKmhe@kreacher > > + Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > > If you look at that message (via the link above), you'll see that it has an > in-body "Subject:" line: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > Subject: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-cmos: > > I have no idea how it ended up there (you'd have to ask Rafael), but git will > always use the in-body "Subject:" header when it sees it. > Ah, yes! Thanks for the fast reply! -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com