From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (relay7-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB13C8ABA; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (Authenticated sender: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FF9720004; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:17:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1668543478; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PLz9m1w6kjPUspj+fiG6rIEsDieaFLsuHz3Pp/OjyG0=; b=LDp9gKotxiDENxxpn/G9wWzjLFw0pYQMOWGW1+mf2vc16cxeo1Ii6LvJPcHOlEqed3U63X E/Ae+AhKssZr7kMzAnV+Fi85aBDul0c+PobqRj37d6c/1/PWjj/gcNOX/6gcUT9zMYA3jW /EztPMC0BeD4AAZV2I/8tK8E4jT0KU290zNc2gnsdzW3NucrFxoHCJcFUcbvxtI320fKZl hTw12z58hW8vbxS+y+u8GklRc/GooUIwkvFpHyfcya13eoaLQnXIDH1TyYPTx7qnRiDZxv YyaYr7WWp8uJq7AEChuoyOE+gVD0MUt5LYAcf1PeqtVP0Dl6OK1dgVQ85TuTpg== Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 21:17:57 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , tools@linux.kernel.org, users@linux.kernel.org Subject: b4 patch subject issue Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Konstantin, I found a small issue in how b4 handles path subjects: linux$ b4 shazam -tsl 5640233.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/5640233.DvuYhMxLoT%40kreacher/t.mbox.gz Checking for newer revisions on https://lore.kernel.org/all/ Analyzing 9 messages in the thread Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... --- [PATCH v2 1/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() + Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Tested-by: Zhang Rui (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4803444.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher + Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni [PATCH v2 2/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() + Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Tested-by: Zhang Rui (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2143522.irdbgypaU6@kreacher + Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni [PATCH v2 3/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Eliminate forward declarations of some functions + Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Tested-by: Zhang Rui (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/13157911.uLZWGnKmhe@kreacher + Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni [PATCH v2 4/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions + Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Tested-by: Zhang Rui (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3225614.44csPzL39Z@kreacher + Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni [PATCH v2 5/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal + Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Tested-by: Zhang Rui (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko (✓ DKIM/intel.com) + Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2224609.iZASKD2KPV@kreacher + Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- Total patches: 5 --- Applying: rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() Applying: rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() Applying: rtc: rtc-cmos: Applying: rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions Applying: rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal --- Patchwork: setting state on patchwork.ozlabs.org/rtc-linux -> under-review : [v2,1/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() -> under-review : [v2,2/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() -> under-review : [v2,3/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Eliminate forward declarations of some functions -> under-review : [v2,4/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions -> under-review : [v2,5/5] rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal linux$ git log --oneline -5 dfe59ef27467 (HEAD -> plop) rtc: rtc-cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal f02e8f979e26 rtc: rtc-cmos: Rename ACPI-related functions a9f73fde7380 rtc: rtc-cmos: 70258aa62244 rtc: rtc-cmos: Call rtc_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() 1c399f3090f7 rtc: rtc-cmos: Call cmos_wake_setup() from cmos_do_probe() For some reason, 3/5 is losing its full subject. I didn't investigate but I'm using a freshly updated b4 0.10.1 on fedora. Let me know if I can be of any assistance to debug that. -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com