All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KMSAN broken with lockdep again?
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:33:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3b9AAEKp2Vr3e6O@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG_fn=XwRo71wqyo-zvZxzE021tY52KKE0j_GmYUjpZeAZa7dA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 02:46:29PM +0100, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 9:12 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying v6.1-rc5 with CONFIG_KMSAN, but the kernel continuously spams
> > "BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __init_waitqueue_head".
> >
> > I tracked it down to lockdep (CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y).  The problem goes away if
> > I disable that.
> >
> > I don't see any obvious use of uninitialized memory in __init_waitqueue_head().
> >
> > The compiler I'm using is tip-of-tree clang (LLVM commit 4155be339ba80fef).
> >
> > Is this a known issue?
> >
> > - Eric
> 
> Thanks for flagging this!
> 
> The reason behind that is that under lockdep we're accessing the
> contents of wq_head->lock->dep_map, which KMSAN considers
> uninitialized.
> The initialization of dep_map happens inside kernel/locking/lockdep.c,
> for which KMSAN is deliberately disabled, because lockep used to
> deadlock in the past.
> 
> As far as I can tell, removing `KMSAN_SANITIZE_lockdep.o := n` does
> not actually break anything now (although the kernel becomes quite
> slow with both lockdep and KMSAN). Let me experiment a bit and send a
> patch.
> If this won't work out, we'll need an explicit call to
> kmsan_unpoison_memory() somewhere in lockdep_init_map_type() to
> suppress these reports.

Thanks.

I tried just disabling CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, but now KMSAN warnings are being
spammed from check_stack_object() in mm/usercopy.c.

Commenting out the call to arch_within_stack_frames() makes it go away.

- Eric


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-18  3:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-16 20:12 KMSAN broken with lockdep again? Eric Biggers
2022-11-17 13:46 ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-11-18  3:33   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-11-18 13:39     ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-11-18 18:19       ` Alexander Potapenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y3b9AAEKp2Vr3e6O@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.