From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
To: Denis Arefev <arefev@swemel.ru>
Cc: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
oss-drivers@netronome.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lvc-project@linuxtesting.org,
trufanov@swemel.ru, vfh@swemel.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] nfp: flower: Added pointer check and continue
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:43:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3d94vyoT0unXnkd@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221118080317.119749-1-arefev@swemel.ru>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:03:17AM +0300, Denis Arefev wrote:
> Return value of a function 'kmalloc_array' is dereferenced at
> lag_conf.c:347 without checking for null,
> but it is usually checked for this function.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> Fixes: bb9a8d031140 ("nfp: flower: monitor and offload LAG groups")
> Signed-off-by: Denis Arefev <arefev@swemel.ru>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/lag_conf.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/lag_conf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/lag_conf.c
> index 63907aeb3884..1aaec4cb9f55 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/lag_conf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/lag_conf.c
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static void nfp_fl_lag_do_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> mutex_lock(&lag->lock);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, storage, &lag->group_list, list) {
> - struct net_device *iter_netdev, **acti_netdevs;
> + struct net_device *iter_netdev, **acti_netdevs = NULL;
Small nit, otherwise looks fine.
I think there is no need to set it to NULL here as it is always set to
return value from kmalloc_array().
Thanks
> struct nfp_flower_repr_priv *repr_priv;
> int active_count = 0, slaves = 0;
> struct nfp_repr *repr;
> @@ -308,6 +308,10 @@ static void nfp_fl_lag_do_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> acti_netdevs = kmalloc_array(entry->slave_cnt,
> sizeof(*acti_netdevs), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!acti_netdevs) {
> + schedule_delayed_work(&lag->work, NFP_FL_LAG_DELAY);
> + continue;
> + }
>
> /* Include sanity check in the loop. It may be that a bond has
> * changed between processing the last notification and the
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-18 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-18 8:03 [PATCH net v3] nfp: flower: Added pointer check and continue Denis Arefev
2022-11-18 12:43 ` Michal Swiatkowski [this message]
2022-11-22 11:16 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3d94vyoT0unXnkd@localhost.localdomain \
--to=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arefev@swemel.ru \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
--cc=simon.horman@netronome.com \
--cc=trufanov@swemel.ru \
--cc=vfh@swemel.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.