From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/7] migration: Remove res_compatible parameter
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:54:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3zUsI7uNbQkabCh@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221003031600.20084-2-quintela@redhat.com>
* Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
> It was only used for RAM, and in that case, it means that this amount
> of data was sent for memory. Just delete the field in all callers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/migration/register.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
> migration/savevm.h | 4 +---
> hw/s390x/s390-stattrib.c | 6 ++----
> hw/vfio/migration.c | 10 ++++------
> migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 7 +++----
> migration/block.c | 7 +++----
> migration/migration.c | 9 ++++-----
> migration/ram.c | 8 +++-----
> migration/savevm.c | 14 +++++---------
> hw/vfio/trace-events | 2 +-
> migration/trace-events | 2 +-
> 11 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/migration/register.h b/include/migration/register.h
> index c1dcff0f90..1950fee6a8 100644
> --- a/include/migration/register.h
> +++ b/include/migration/register.h
> @@ -48,18 +48,18 @@ typedef struct SaveVMHandlers {
> int (*save_setup)(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque);
> void (*save_live_pending)(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque,
> uint64_t threshold_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy_only,
> - uint64_t *res_compatible,
> - uint64_t *res_postcopy_only);
> + uint64_t *rest_precopy,
> + uint64_t *rest_postcopy);
> /* Note for save_live_pending:
> - * - res_precopy_only is for data which must be migrated in precopy phase
> - * or in stopped state, in other words - before target vm start
> - * - res_compatible is for data which may be migrated in any phase
> - * - res_postcopy_only is for data which must be migrated in postcopy phase
> - * or in stopped state, in other words - after source vm stop
> + * - res_precopy is for data which must be migrated in precopy
> + * phase or in stopped state, in other words - before target
> + * vm start
> + * - res_postcopy is for data which must be migrated in postcopy
> + * phase or in stopped state, in other words - after source vm
> + * stop
> *
> - * Sum of res_postcopy_only, res_compatible and res_postcopy_only is the
> - * whole amount of pending data.
> + * Sum of res_precopy and res_postcopy is the whole amount of
> + * pending data.
I'm not sure if this is correct; I think we really do have three
different kinds of device:
a) Those that don't know how to postcopy
b) Those that can only send data in postcopy (which I think is what
the dirty-bitmap block stuff does)
c) Devices that know how to postcopy, like RAM
<snip>
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index dc1de9ddbc..20167e1102 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -3435,9 +3435,7 @@ static int ram_save_complete(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
> }
>
> static void ram_save_pending(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, uint64_t max_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy_only,
> - uint64_t *res_compatible,
> - uint64_t *res_postcopy_only)
> + uint64_t *res_precopy, uint64_t *res_postcopy)
> {
> RAMState **temp = opaque;
> RAMState *rs = *temp;
> @@ -3457,9 +3455,9 @@ static void ram_save_pending(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, uint64_t max_size,
>
> if (migrate_postcopy_ram()) {
> /* We can do postcopy, and all the data is postcopiable */
> - *res_compatible += remaining_size;
> + *res_postcopy += remaining_size;
migrate_postcopy_ram() says that postcopy is enabled, not active, so here you are saying that
ram is 'postcopy only' according to your definition above.
I don't think it actually changes behaviour though at the moment; but it
doesn't feel right to assign that to something that says 'postcopy only'
migration_iteration_run doesn't enforce the postcopy-only part very
hard; it's just part of the threshold as far as I can tell.
Dave
> } else {
> - *res_precopy_only += remaining_size;
> + *res_precopy += remaining_size;
> }
> }
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index bb8bbddfe4..440aa62f16 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -3734,15 +3734,14 @@ typedef enum {
> */
> static MigIterateState migration_iteration_run(MigrationState *s)
> {
> - uint64_t pending_size, pend_pre, pend_compat, pend_post;
> + uint64_t pending_size, pend_pre, pend_post;
> bool in_postcopy = s->state == MIGRATION_STATUS_POSTCOPY_ACTIVE;
>
> qemu_savevm_state_pending(s->to_dst_file, s->threshold_size, &pend_pre,
> - &pend_compat, &pend_post);
> - pending_size = pend_pre + pend_compat + pend_post;
> + &pend_post);
> + pending_size = pend_pre + pend_post;
>
> - trace_migrate_pending(pending_size, s->threshold_size,
> - pend_pre, pend_compat, pend_post);
> + trace_migrate_pending(pending_size, s->threshold_size, pend_pre, pend_post);
>
> if (pending_size && pending_size >= s->threshold_size) {
> /* Still a significant amount to transfer */
> diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c
> index 48e85c052c..a752ff9ea1 100644
> --- a/migration/savevm.c
> +++ b/migration/savevm.c
> @@ -1472,16 +1472,13 @@ flush:
> * for units that can't do postcopy.
> */
> void qemu_savevm_state_pending(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t threshold_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy_only,
> - uint64_t *res_compatible,
> - uint64_t *res_postcopy_only)
> + uint64_t *res_precopy,
> + uint64_t *res_postcopy)
> {
> SaveStateEntry *se;
>
> - *res_precopy_only = 0;
> - *res_compatible = 0;
> - *res_postcopy_only = 0;
> -
> + *res_precopy = 0;
> + *res_postcopy = 0;
>
> QTAILQ_FOREACH(se, &savevm_state.handlers, entry) {
> if (!se->ops || !se->ops->save_live_pending) {
> @@ -1493,8 +1490,7 @@ void qemu_savevm_state_pending(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t threshold_size,
> }
> }
> se->ops->save_live_pending(f, se->opaque, threshold_size,
> - res_precopy_only, res_compatible,
> - res_postcopy_only);
> + res_precopy, res_postcopy);
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/trace-events b/hw/vfio/trace-events
> index 73dffe9e00..a21cbd2a56 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/vfio/trace-events
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ vfio_save_cleanup(const char *name) " (%s)"
> vfio_save_buffer(const char *name, uint64_t data_offset, uint64_t data_size, uint64_t pending) " (%s) Offset 0x%"PRIx64" size 0x%"PRIx64" pending 0x%"PRIx64
> vfio_update_pending(const char *name, uint64_t pending) " (%s) pending 0x%"PRIx64
> vfio_save_device_config_state(const char *name) " (%s)"
> -vfio_save_pending(const char *name, uint64_t precopy, uint64_t postcopy, uint64_t compatible) " (%s) precopy 0x%"PRIx64" postcopy 0x%"PRIx64" compatible 0x%"PRIx64
> +vfio_save_pending(const char *name, uint64_t precopy, uint64_t postcopy) " (%s) precopy 0x%"PRIx64" postcopy 0x%"PRIx64
> vfio_save_iterate(const char *name, int data_size) " (%s) data_size %d"
> vfio_save_complete_precopy(const char *name) " (%s)"
> vfio_load_device_config_state(const char *name) " (%s)"
> diff --git a/migration/trace-events b/migration/trace-events
> index 57003edcbd..f2a873fd6c 100644
> --- a/migration/trace-events
> +++ b/migration/trace-events
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ migrate_fd_cleanup(void) ""
> migrate_fd_error(const char *error_desc) "error=%s"
> migrate_fd_cancel(void) ""
> migrate_handle_rp_req_pages(const char *rbname, size_t start, size_t len) "in %s at 0x%zx len 0x%zx"
> -migrate_pending(uint64_t size, uint64_t max, uint64_t pre, uint64_t compat, uint64_t post) "pending size %" PRIu64 " max %" PRIu64 " (pre = %" PRIu64 " compat=%" PRIu64 " post=%" PRIu64 ")"
> +migrate_pending(uint64_t size, uint64_t max, uint64_t pre, uint64_t post) "pending size %" PRIu64 " max %" PRIu64 " (pre = %" PRIu64 " post=%" PRIu64 ")"
> migrate_send_rp_message(int msg_type, uint16_t len) "%d: len %d"
> migrate_send_rp_recv_bitmap(char *name, int64_t size) "block '%s' size 0x%"PRIi64
> migration_completion_file_err(void) ""
> --
> 2.37.2
>
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-03 3:15 [RFC 0/7] migration patches for VFIO Juan Quintela
2022-10-03 3:15 ` [RFC 1/7] migration: Remove res_compatible parameter Juan Quintela
2022-11-22 13:54 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2022-10-03 3:15 ` [RFC 2/7] migration: No save_live_pending() method uses the QEMUFile parameter Juan Quintela
2022-11-22 17:48 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-10-03 3:15 ` [RFC 3/7] migration: Block migration comment or code is wrong Juan Quintela
2022-10-03 19:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-10-03 3:15 ` [RFC 4/7] migration: Split save_live_pending() into state_pending_* Juan Quintela
2022-11-22 20:08 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-10-03 3:15 ` [RFC 5/7] migration: Remove unused threshold_size parameter Juan Quintela
2022-11-23 16:38 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-10-03 3:15 ` [RFC 6/7] migration: simplify migration_iteration_run() Juan Quintela
2022-11-23 17:39 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-10-03 3:16 ` [RFC 7/7] migration: call qemu_savevm_state_pending_exact() with the guest stopped Juan Quintela
2022-10-13 12:25 ` Joao Martins
2022-10-13 16:08 ` Juan Quintela
2022-10-14 10:36 ` Joao Martins
2022-10-14 11:28 ` Juan Quintela
2022-10-14 12:29 ` Joao Martins
2022-10-18 12:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe via
2022-10-19 15:51 ` Yishai Hadas
2022-10-14 19:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-20 14:56 ` [RFC 0/7] migration patches for VFIO Yishai Hadas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3zUsI7uNbQkabCh@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.