From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00367C352A1 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 18:10:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A5840C80; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 13:10:41 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kGiYO4xdXYqS; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 13:10:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331B54B3D0; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 13:10:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEE141016 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 13:10:39 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QghjjIWOM88t for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 13:10:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com (mail-pl1-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB7140C80 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 13:10:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id w23so14700564ply.12 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 10:10:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gAdL/5nVVJu1FQlGTdfBjUls0ERNiH40RtP9DKw3LIs=; b=l9AGT4fXhM1oH7Du6wFnaTWjSCn3ASy0EdsFYwoxpz1XTmSJrI/6IYPrztRWGtgphI MEU1JwB6naZw7c/1ettMldjjpLk7glwpCWqV3EXpRuhUI+cM9iyuVCU+X8uFtQpMw16H y+VgP6Yz+mAMFxaAy3HgfBPOTFYdo5y/iogmk26sWTFOPpJyLaBDhg94MEROnHf5IE94 nWYww6CfABnUnL1AnWY2Cgwf8IRzYPXH3CPErKTJKwYOxZqve3srRPJGRu+YDWCJOMyj ciVWMbA+0QFhqsdHTxv5x8llaaAKjhSyqtXi87fJCtsbFm+lXv45WSeSP6LhgyyqgED4 rVjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=gAdL/5nVVJu1FQlGTdfBjUls0ERNiH40RtP9DKw3LIs=; b=cX/TTuD5nzE8mjGCJ5FViryY91NfXKhjfhuQHtUPup/mwIR+ui/UJDkwxqBoiL889X 9bt0wyKW67dece/Xj0MbN96gJE4ev17j08hWjKrAT1U45F9y/zrn221Hkjuo/YBSuKA9 AJDj9FPSkgFZS3uUhU0ptlETbuUlZOkvHW/3rv/vUFSqCeT30QC3bN0zKqU+qvFt1nQ9 S9Gdzd25JuFAAiIrGPI2rtjRHt71oXP1QtmIEYZZBH5HIUuh+qDFlmPJDR26Ah3aon6Z 7fvgVxYw2LOVmlXcMIo7L29pd5LyV43CeSZtni9Ovwawiwq274nA90tiTO6re6KVbNit jwxA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pko5QJ1xoUSl59GNM5lcjZ/g1hRPPXEvTgewxyIZQdAZqpvOclh qwg0z8Vhhvg4XQBH5FKUFy5d5A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5SWGEOLKnaGxze9XgAsm4nFZyJ++7ROo35teN3Ikc66p+MXKu2i9uybgiJng0VsXfgkbFF9Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c68d:b0:219:d415:d787 with SMTP id n13-20020a17090ac68d00b00219d415d787mr11690151pjt.127.1670350236316; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 10:10:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (7.104.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.104.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x14-20020a170902ec8e00b001897916be2bsm12957433plg.268.2022.12.06.10.10.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Dec 2022 10:10:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 18:10:32 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 updates for 6.2 Message-ID: References: <20221205155845.233018-1-maz@kernel.org> <3230b8bd-b763-9ad1-769b-68e6555e4100@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3230b8bd-b763-9ad1-769b-68e6555e4100@redhat.com> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Andrew Jones , Usama Arif , Bagas Sanjaya , Ben Gardon , "Maciej S . Szmigiero" , Will Deacon , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Marek Szyprowski , Marc Zyngier , Steven Price , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jakub Kicinski , Anshuman Khandual , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Brown , kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, Peter Collingbourne , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Cornelia Huck , Zhiyuan Dai , Andrew Morton X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Tue, Dec 06, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 12/5/22 16:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > - There is a lot of selftest conflicts with your own branch, see: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201112432.4cb9ae42@canb.auug.org.au > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201113626.438f13c5@canb.auug.org.au > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201115741.7de32422@canb.auug.org.au > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201120939.3c19f004@canb.auug.org.au > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201131623.18ebc8d8@canb.auug.org.au > > > > for a rather exhaustive collection. > > Yeah, I saw them in Stephen's messages but missed your reply. > > In retrospect, at least Gavin's series for memslot_perf_test should have > been applied by both of us with a topic branch, but there's so many > conflicts all over the place that it's hard to single out one series. > It just happens. Alternatively, we could have a dedicated selftests/kvm tree (or branch)? I almost suggested doing that on multiple occasions this cycle, but ultimately decided not to because it would effectively mean splitting series that touch KVM and selftests into different trees, which would create a different kind of dependency hell. Or maybe a hybrid approach where series that only (or mostly?) touch selftests go into a dedicated tree? I get the feeling that I'm overthinking things though, this level of activity and conflicts should be relatively rare. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com (mail-pl1-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB8F727727 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 18:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id d3so14715851plr.10 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 10:10:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gAdL/5nVVJu1FQlGTdfBjUls0ERNiH40RtP9DKw3LIs=; b=l9AGT4fXhM1oH7Du6wFnaTWjSCn3ASy0EdsFYwoxpz1XTmSJrI/6IYPrztRWGtgphI MEU1JwB6naZw7c/1ettMldjjpLk7glwpCWqV3EXpRuhUI+cM9iyuVCU+X8uFtQpMw16H y+VgP6Yz+mAMFxaAy3HgfBPOTFYdo5y/iogmk26sWTFOPpJyLaBDhg94MEROnHf5IE94 nWYww6CfABnUnL1AnWY2Cgwf8IRzYPXH3CPErKTJKwYOxZqve3srRPJGRu+YDWCJOMyj ciVWMbA+0QFhqsdHTxv5x8llaaAKjhSyqtXi87fJCtsbFm+lXv45WSeSP6LhgyyqgED4 rVjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=gAdL/5nVVJu1FQlGTdfBjUls0ERNiH40RtP9DKw3LIs=; b=SP108fd6BSLH87safqSD8oR8dI48jAg31QpOchvICi4GuOR5hGusndDkVHMko6pQmS yXqrW52fcbzFx+2XdB24AcGyAZ2GhAmCnjqXsIenON1zDVYUyOEJZpPzBUANCwz8B+Gd vDMOdAeaCux/ttv17GHzw0LxN03oNImxikmxDXyRKMU53ZgCT7nnYfmq3oZGp70QLayE 99dX2ICnLO53dzU+sX3NKoubjeczD6cUcxMxssUgCk9AUMx//D7p9O5S3lojjSTF0+GS pzxC0ZwoJpbWy6nU1IBBB9ERwXE6OQodpSuCiEj1ArFS+o1dITdWEtSq8Tiyetc4NMqC KVBg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pn5RKsWPoxvQAr1IsDg3lqADDzDPUKddmIdDWOUIKhliC/cNly9 wjrvKWsXTKUOPfEuJg47CTRI+w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5SWGEOLKnaGxze9XgAsm4nFZyJ++7ROo35teN3Ikc66p+MXKu2i9uybgiJng0VsXfgkbFF9Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c68d:b0:219:d415:d787 with SMTP id n13-20020a17090ac68d00b00219d415d787mr11690151pjt.127.1670350236316; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 10:10:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (7.104.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.104.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x14-20020a170902ec8e00b001897916be2bsm12957433plg.268.2022.12.06.10.10.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Dec 2022 10:10:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 18:10:32 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Marc Zyngier , Andrew Jones , Andrew Morton , Anshuman Khandual , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Bagas Sanjaya , Ben Gardon , Catalin Marinas , Cornelia Huck , Fuad Tabba , Gavin Shan , Jakub Kicinski , James Morse , "Maciej S . Szmigiero" , Marek Szyprowski , Mark Brown , Mark Rutland , Oliver Upton , Peter Collingbourne , Peter Xu , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Quentin Perret , Reiji Watanabe , Ricardo Koller , Ryan Roberts , Steven Price , Usama Arif , Vincent Donnefort , Will Deacon , Zhiyuan Dai , Suzuki K Poulose , Alexandru Elisei , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 updates for 6.2 Message-ID: References: <20221205155845.233018-1-maz@kernel.org> <3230b8bd-b763-9ad1-769b-68e6555e4100@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3230b8bd-b763-9ad1-769b-68e6555e4100@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20221206181032.DO_opxSli0yxYfW7DWSTKcE_cNjFMoliPuQzmxohQxA@z> On Tue, Dec 06, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 12/5/22 16:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > - There is a lot of selftest conflicts with your own branch, see: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201112432.4cb9ae42@canb.auug.org.au > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201113626.438f13c5@canb.auug.org.au > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201115741.7de32422@canb.auug.org.au > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201120939.3c19f004@canb.auug.org.au > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201131623.18ebc8d8@canb.auug.org.au > > > > for a rather exhaustive collection. > > Yeah, I saw them in Stephen's messages but missed your reply. > > In retrospect, at least Gavin's series for memslot_perf_test should have > been applied by both of us with a topic branch, but there's so many > conflicts all over the place that it's hard to single out one series. > It just happens. Alternatively, we could have a dedicated selftests/kvm tree (or branch)? I almost suggested doing that on multiple occasions this cycle, but ultimately decided not to because it would effectively mean splitting series that touch KVM and selftests into different trees, which would create a different kind of dependency hell. Or maybe a hybrid approach where series that only (or mostly?) touch selftests go into a dedicated tree? I get the feeling that I'm overthinking things though, this level of activity and conflicts should be relatively rare. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC856C352A1 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 18:12:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=zX3p1wHqjNLG/Ie+gT+i/DQk0irX0xhqgL6gyf3JKh8=; b=a0JSFhI7ck1Pao 3Q9f0Z8LPqkqQ/4bk40+96NAAe/OnPsJFzeS2J2yB4BJy/53Wu2oZvkUYTWQoMi67xqJ9NKvsUM3C cuCpfwnRLKZ/pmsbB0qKUl9S3ZV3o+yqdPKalLKuV04N42oyF/Q6vF9xtY1r1GRynJbMfbvQaCicF HtPlMRclxUiZe82/7TnvvGVDvr38m2WX2RGXvyFhyCAAwxm/bUl+BrSdBnolBigF7EmCqESFiYct8 IWU/aY74sMv24ToaLTCOUO3mSpjQniM9x90N9XhyEvjHh8SishkHzGQ6uQaNgixlwsqyqA8xfePxC GIKB7c+xGg2rRZAMQRng==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p2cOw-00H49d-0H; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 18:10:42 +0000 Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p2cOt-00H3x3-71 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 18:10:40 +0000 Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id y17so14730245plp.3 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 10:10:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gAdL/5nVVJu1FQlGTdfBjUls0ERNiH40RtP9DKw3LIs=; b=l9AGT4fXhM1oH7Du6wFnaTWjSCn3ASy0EdsFYwoxpz1XTmSJrI/6IYPrztRWGtgphI MEU1JwB6naZw7c/1ettMldjjpLk7glwpCWqV3EXpRuhUI+cM9iyuVCU+X8uFtQpMw16H y+VgP6Yz+mAMFxaAy3HgfBPOTFYdo5y/iogmk26sWTFOPpJyLaBDhg94MEROnHf5IE94 nWYww6CfABnUnL1AnWY2Cgwf8IRzYPXH3CPErKTJKwYOxZqve3srRPJGRu+YDWCJOMyj ciVWMbA+0QFhqsdHTxv5x8llaaAKjhSyqtXi87fJCtsbFm+lXv45WSeSP6LhgyyqgED4 rVjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=gAdL/5nVVJu1FQlGTdfBjUls0ERNiH40RtP9DKw3LIs=; b=IclxrzZqbXvtUgBbap45qa59PvEP9q2RFTGc2m6FoVhZTP8fnkSPjcmAawk5KkpPEQ u3qJ1ClKfA6hZNlIIsTYDWFz7x0UAaG/ypVy9v6UnicbSqP8GRd+vTkdyedT1/bMzUtc de/J/Su34amxDNX7f6N/J7WNW4J5mjb3LcfXHrbaUIPkUscmMbUd7Ahg+gfd7epXFd+9 4TZPgq+2iD54kZsKs9GnOtbJyRNDtuoVxvpbTsJTs9BHrvpqK3RoG7mv0IfFQFaJXgky EtAERYpdvqRFFn4+ChMF1sl9kiT1CyJZJ1redV6Ku9pD1epRyPi/64a8WIo3VruSUf0L Husw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmU5H+39dnDUHvYPp6K+wtOrPDANcEEf+uWo56LG1iWLc2UyEdA cq9RD7LvPMpcMDIn/Rf3dbb2mg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5SWGEOLKnaGxze9XgAsm4nFZyJ++7ROo35teN3Ikc66p+MXKu2i9uybgiJng0VsXfgkbFF9Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c68d:b0:219:d415:d787 with SMTP id n13-20020a17090ac68d00b00219d415d787mr11690151pjt.127.1670350236316; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 10:10:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com (7.104.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.104.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x14-20020a170902ec8e00b001897916be2bsm12957433plg.268.2022.12.06.10.10.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Dec 2022 10:10:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 18:10:32 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Marc Zyngier , Andrew Jones , Andrew Morton , Anshuman Khandual , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Bagas Sanjaya , Ben Gardon , Catalin Marinas , Cornelia Huck , Fuad Tabba , Gavin Shan , Jakub Kicinski , James Morse , "Maciej S . Szmigiero" , Marek Szyprowski , Mark Brown , Mark Rutland , Oliver Upton , Peter Collingbourne , Peter Xu , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Quentin Perret , Reiji Watanabe , Ricardo Koller , Ryan Roberts , Steven Price , Usama Arif , Vincent Donnefort , Will Deacon , Zhiyuan Dai , Suzuki K Poulose , Alexandru Elisei , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 updates for 6.2 Message-ID: References: <20221205155845.233018-1-maz@kernel.org> <3230b8bd-b763-9ad1-769b-68e6555e4100@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3230b8bd-b763-9ad1-769b-68e6555e4100@redhat.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221206_101039_294178_09E82477 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.81 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Dec 06, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 12/5/22 16:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > - There is a lot of selftest conflicts with your own branch, see: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201112432.4cb9ae42@canb.auug.org.au > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201113626.438f13c5@canb.auug.org.au > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201115741.7de32422@canb.auug.org.au > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201120939.3c19f004@canb.auug.org.au > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201131623.18ebc8d8@canb.auug.org.au > > > > for a rather exhaustive collection. > > Yeah, I saw them in Stephen's messages but missed your reply. > > In retrospect, at least Gavin's series for memslot_perf_test should have > been applied by both of us with a topic branch, but there's so many > conflicts all over the place that it's hard to single out one series. > It just happens. Alternatively, we could have a dedicated selftests/kvm tree (or branch)? I almost suggested doing that on multiple occasions this cycle, but ultimately decided not to because it would effectively mean splitting series that touch KVM and selftests into different trees, which would create a different kind of dependency hell. Or maybe a hybrid approach where series that only (or mostly?) touch selftests go into a dedicated tree? I get the feeling that I'm overthinking things though, this level of activity and conflicts should be relatively rare. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel