From: "Lisovskiy, Stanislav" <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/audio : Consider fractional vdsc bpp while computing tu_data
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 09:35:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y42fQ3LLtuILCzql@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221128101922.217217-8-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 03:49:18PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> MTL+ supports fractional compressed bits_per_pixel, with precision of
> 1/16. This compressed bpp is stored in U6.4 format.
> Accommodate the precision during calculation of transfer unit data
> for hblank_early calculation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_audio.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_audio.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_audio.c
> index f63d5824aca2..4797040a6362 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_audio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_audio.c
> @@ -510,14 +510,14 @@ static unsigned int calc_hblank_early_prog(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> unsigned int link_clks_available, link_clks_required;
> unsigned int tu_data, tu_line, link_clks_active;
> unsigned int h_active, h_total, hblank_delta, pixel_clk;
> - unsigned int fec_coeff, cdclk, vdsc_bpp;
> + unsigned int fec_coeff, cdclk, vdsc_bppx16;
> unsigned int link_clk, lanes;
> unsigned int hblank_rise;
>
> h_active = crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay;
> h_total = crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal;
> pixel_clk = crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock;
> - vdsc_bpp = dsc_integral_compressed_bpp(crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp);
> + vdsc_bppx16 = crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp;
> cdclk = i915->display.cdclk.hw.cdclk;
> /* fec= 0.972261, using rounding multiplier of 1000000 */
> fec_coeff = 972261;
> @@ -525,10 +525,10 @@ static unsigned int calc_hblank_early_prog(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> lanes = crtc_state->lane_count;
>
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "h_active = %u link_clk = %u :"
> - "lanes = %u vdsc_bpp = %u cdclk = %u\n",
> - h_active, link_clk, lanes, vdsc_bpp, cdclk);
> + "lanes = %u vdsc_bppx16 = %u cdclk = %u\n",
> + h_active, link_clk, lanes, vdsc_bppx16, cdclk);
>
> - if (WARN_ON(!link_clk || !pixel_clk || !lanes || !vdsc_bpp || !cdclk))
> + if (WARN_ON(!link_clk || !pixel_clk || !lanes || !vdsc_bppx16 || !cdclk))
> return 0;
>
> link_clks_available = (h_total - h_active) * link_clk / pixel_clk - 28;
> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static unsigned int calc_hblank_early_prog(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> hblank_delta = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(mul_u32_u32(5 * (link_clk + cdclk), pixel_clk),
> mul_u32_u32(link_clk, cdclk));
>
> - tu_data = div64_u64(mul_u32_u32(pixel_clk * vdsc_bpp * 8, 1000000),
> + tu_data = div64_u64(mul_u32_u32(pixel_clk * vdsc_bppx16 * 8, 16 * 1000000),
I think it should be:
tu_data = div64_u64(mul_u32_u32(pixel_clk * vdsc_bppx16 * 8, 1000000),
mul_u32_u32(link_clk * lanes * 16, fec_coeff));
i.e you need to divide by 16 but not multiply, because vdsc_bppx16 already
stores vdsc_bpp multiplied by 16, which is visible from the logs,
during testing it was for example 384 for bpp 24, so no point in multiplying
it once again.
Stan
> mul_u32_u32(link_clk * lanes, fec_coeff));
> tu_line = div64_u64(h_active * mul_u32_u32(link_clk, fec_coeff),
> mul_u32_u32(64 * pixel_clk, 1000000));
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-28 10:19 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/11] Add DSC fractional bpp support Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/dp: Check if force dsc bpc <= max requested bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/display/dp: Add helper function to get DSC bpp prescision Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 15:27 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/dp: Rename helpers to get DSC max pipe bpp and max output bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/dp: Get optimal link config to have best compressed bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2022-12-05 7:28 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2022-12-06 10:15 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/display: Store compressed bpp in U6.4 format Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/display: Consider fractional vdsc bpp while computing m_n values Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/audio : Consider fractional vdsc bpp while computing tu_data Ankit Nautiyal
2022-12-05 7:35 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav [this message]
2022-12-06 10:19 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/dsc/mtl: Add support for fractional bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/dp: Iterate over output bpp with fractional step size Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/dsc: Add debugfs entry to validate DSC fractional bpp Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 10:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/dsc: Allow DSC only with fractional bpp when forced from debugfs Ankit Nautiyal
2022-11-28 12:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add DSC fractional bpp support Patchwork
2022-11-28 12:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2022-11-28 13:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-11-28 16:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y42fQ3LLtuILCzql@intel.com \
--to=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.