* [PATCH 01/10] vfio: Simplify vfio_create_group()
2022-12-01 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-01 14:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 02/10] vfio: Move the sanity check of the group to vfio_create_group() Yi Liu
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex.williamson, jgg
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
The vfio.group_lock is now only used to serialize vfio_group creation
and destruction, we don't need a micro-optimization of searching,
unlocking, then allocating and searching again. Just hold the lock
the whole time.
Grabbed from:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220922152338.2a2238fe.alex.williamson@redhat.com/
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 33 ++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index c1c78858b45e..0e66eb40992b 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -130,10 +130,12 @@ static void vfio_release_device_set(struct vfio_device *device)
* Group objects - create, release, get, put, search
*/
static struct vfio_group *
-__vfio_group_get_from_iommu(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
+vfio_group_get_from_iommu(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
{
struct vfio_group *group;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&vfio.group_lock);
+
/*
* group->iommu_group from the vfio.group_list cannot be NULL
* under the vfio.group_lock.
@@ -147,17 +149,6 @@ __vfio_group_get_from_iommu(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
return NULL;
}
-static struct vfio_group *
-vfio_group_get_from_iommu(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group;
-
- mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
- group = __vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
- mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
- return group;
-}
-
static void vfio_group_release(struct device *dev)
{
struct vfio_group *group = container_of(dev, struct vfio_group, dev);
@@ -212,6 +203,8 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
struct vfio_group *ret;
int err;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&vfio.group_lock);
+
group = vfio_group_alloc(iommu_group, type);
if (IS_ERR(group))
return group;
@@ -224,26 +217,16 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
goto err_put;
}
- mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
-
- /* Did we race creating this group? */
- ret = __vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
- if (ret)
- goto err_unlock;
-
err = cdev_device_add(&group->cdev, &group->dev);
if (err) {
ret = ERR_PTR(err);
- goto err_unlock;
+ goto err_put;
}
list_add(&group->vfio_next, &vfio.group_list);
- mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
return group;
-err_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
err_put:
put_device(&group->dev);
return ret;
@@ -440,7 +423,9 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev,
if (ret)
goto out_put_group;
+ mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, type);
+ mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
if (IS_ERR(group)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(group);
goto out_remove_device;
@@ -489,9 +474,11 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
+ mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
group = vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
if (!group)
group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, VFIO_IOMMU);
+ mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
/* The vfio_group holds a reference to the iommu_group */
iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH 02/10] vfio: Move the sanity check of the group to vfio_create_group()
2022-12-01 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 01/10] vfio: Simplify vfio_create_group() Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-01 14:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 03/10] vfio: Create wrappers for group register/unregister Yi Liu
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex.williamson, jgg
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
This avoids opening group specific code in __vfio_register_dev() for the
sanity check if an (existing) group is not corrupted by having two copies
of the same struct device in it. It also simplifies the error unwind for
this sanity check since the failure can be detected in the group allocation.
This also prepares for moving the group specific code into separate group.c.
Grabbed from:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220922152338.2a2238fe.alex.williamson@redhat.com/
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 0e66eb40992b..9f05dab0fab5 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static void vfio_release_device_set(struct vfio_device *device)
* Group objects - create, release, get, put, search
*/
static struct vfio_group *
-vfio_group_get_from_iommu(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
+vfio_group_find_from_iommu(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
{
struct vfio_group *group;
@@ -141,10 +141,8 @@ vfio_group_get_from_iommu(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
* under the vfio.group_lock.
*/
list_for_each_entry(group, &vfio.group_list, vfio_next) {
- if (group->iommu_group == iommu_group) {
- refcount_inc(&group->drivers);
+ if (group->iommu_group == iommu_group)
return group;
- }
}
return NULL;
}
@@ -294,23 +292,6 @@ static bool vfio_device_try_get_registration(struct vfio_device *device)
return refcount_inc_not_zero(&device->refcount);
}
-static struct vfio_device *vfio_group_get_device(struct vfio_group *group,
- struct device *dev)
-{
- struct vfio_device *device;
-
- mutex_lock(&group->device_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(device, &group->device_list, group_next) {
- if (device->dev == dev &&
- vfio_device_try_get_registration(device)) {
- mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
- return device;
- }
- }
- mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
- return NULL;
-}
-
/*
* VFIO driver API
*/
@@ -440,6 +421,21 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev,
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
+static bool vfio_group_has_device(struct vfio_group *group, struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct vfio_device *device;
+
+ mutex_lock(&group->device_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(device, &group->device_list, group_next) {
+ if (device->dev == dev) {
+ mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
+ return false;
+}
+
static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
{
struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
@@ -475,9 +471,15 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
}
mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
- group = vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
- if (!group)
+ group = vfio_group_find_from_iommu(iommu_group);
+ if (group) {
+ if (WARN_ON(vfio_group_has_device(group, dev)))
+ group = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ else
+ refcount_inc(&group->drivers);
+ } else {
group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, VFIO_IOMMU);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
/* The vfio_group holds a reference to the iommu_group */
@@ -488,7 +490,6 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
struct vfio_group *group)
{
- struct vfio_device *existing_device;
int ret;
/*
@@ -510,19 +511,6 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
if (!device->dev_set)
vfio_assign_device_set(device, device);
- existing_device = vfio_group_get_device(group, device->dev);
- if (existing_device) {
- /*
- * group->iommu_group is non-NULL because we hold the drivers
- * refcount.
- */
- dev_WARN(device->dev, "Device already exists on group %d\n",
- iommu_group_id(group->iommu_group));
- vfio_device_put_registration(existing_device);
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto err_out;
- }
-
/* Our reference on group is moved to the device */
device->group = group;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH 03/10] vfio: Create wrappers for group register/unregister
2022-12-01 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 01/10] vfio: Simplify vfio_create_group() Yi Liu
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 02/10] vfio: Move the sanity check of the group to vfio_create_group() Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-01 14:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 04/10] vfio: Set device->group in helper function Yi Liu
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex.williamson, jgg
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun
This avoids decoding group fields in the common functions used by
vfio_device registration, and prepares for further moving the vfio group
specific code into separate file.
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 9f05dab0fab5..7017d3da6e6f 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -487,6 +487,20 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
return group;
}
+static void vfio_device_group_register(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&device->group->device_lock);
+ list_add(&device->group_next, &device->group->device_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&device->group->device_lock);
+}
+
+static void vfio_device_group_unregister(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&device->group->device_lock);
+ list_del(&device->group_next);
+ mutex_unlock(&device->group->device_lock);
+}
+
static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
struct vfio_group *group)
{
@@ -525,9 +539,7 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
/* Refcounting can't start until the driver calls register */
refcount_set(&device->refcount, 1);
- mutex_lock(&group->device_lock);
- list_add(&device->group_next, &group->device_list);
- mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
+ vfio_device_group_register(device);
return 0;
err_out:
@@ -587,7 +599,6 @@ static struct vfio_device *vfio_device_get_from_name(struct vfio_group *group,
* removed. Open file descriptors for the device... */
void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
{
- struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
unsigned int i = 0;
bool interrupted = false;
long rc;
@@ -615,9 +626,7 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
}
}
- mutex_lock(&group->device_lock);
- list_del(&device->group_next);
- mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
+ vfio_device_group_unregister(device);
/* Balances device_add in register path */
device_del(&device->device);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH 04/10] vfio: Set device->group in helper function
2022-12-01 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 03/10] vfio: Create wrappers for group register/unregister Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-01 14:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-02 5:34 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 05/10] vfio: Swap order of vfio_device_container_register() and open_device() Yi Liu
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex.williamson, jgg
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun
This avoids referencing device->group in __vfio_register_dev().
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 7017d3da6e6f..d1e8e5d2a1bc 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -501,18 +501,29 @@ static void vfio_device_group_unregister(struct vfio_device *device)
mutex_unlock(&device->group->device_lock);
}
-static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
- struct vfio_group *group)
+static int vfio_device_set_group(struct vfio_device *device,
+ enum vfio_group_type type)
{
- int ret;
+ struct vfio_group *group;
+
+ if (type == VFIO_IOMMU)
+ group = vfio_group_find_or_alloc(device->dev);
+ else
+ group = vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(device->dev, type);
- /*
- * In all cases group is the output of one of the group allocation
- * functions and we have group->drivers incremented for us.
- */
if (IS_ERR(group))
return PTR_ERR(group);
+ /* Our reference on group is moved to the device */
+ device->group = group;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
+ enum vfio_group_type type)
+{
+ int ret;
+
if (WARN_ON(device->ops->bind_iommufd &&
(!device->ops->unbind_iommufd ||
!device->ops->attach_ioas)))
@@ -525,12 +536,13 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
if (!device->dev_set)
vfio_assign_device_set(device, device);
- /* Our reference on group is moved to the device */
- device->group = group;
-
ret = dev_set_name(&device->device, "vfio%d", device->index);
if (ret)
- goto err_out;
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = vfio_device_set_group(device, type);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
ret = device_add(&device->device);
if (ret)
@@ -549,8 +561,7 @@ static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
{
- return __vfio_register_dev(device,
- vfio_group_find_or_alloc(device->dev));
+ return __vfio_register_dev(device, VFIO_IOMMU);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_register_group_dev);
@@ -560,8 +571,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_register_group_dev);
*/
int vfio_register_emulated_iommu_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
{
- return __vfio_register_dev(device,
- vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(device->dev, VFIO_EMULATED_IOMMU));
+ return __vfio_register_dev(device, VFIO_EMULATED_IOMMU);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_register_emulated_iommu_dev);
@@ -631,6 +641,7 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
/* Balances device_add in register path */
device_del(&device->device);
+ /* Balances vfio_device_set_group in register path */
vfio_device_remove_group(device);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_unregister_group_dev);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 04/10] vfio: Set device->group in helper function
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 04/10] vfio: Set device->group in helper function Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-02 5:34 ` Tian, Kevin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Tian, Kevin @ 2022-12-02 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liu, Yi L, alex.williamson@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, Liu, Yi L, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com
> From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 10:55 PM
>
> This avoids referencing device->group in __vfio_register_dev().
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 05/10] vfio: Swap order of vfio_device_container_register() and open_device()
2022-12-01 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 04/10] vfio: Set device->group in helper function Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-01 14:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 06/10] vfio: Move device open/close code to be helpfers Yi Liu
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex.williamson, jgg
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun
This makes the DMA unmap callback registration to container be consistent
across the vfio iommufd compat mode and the legacy container mode.
In the vfio iommufd compat mode, this registration is done in the
vfio_iommufd_bind() when creating access which has an unmap callback. This
is prior to calling the open_device() op. The existing mdev drivers have
been converted to be OK with this order. So it is ok to swap the order of
vfio_device_container_register() and open_device() for legacy mode.
This also prepares for further moving group specific code into separate
source file.
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index d1e8e5d2a1bc..4f2d32d4a3d0 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -780,6 +780,7 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device)
ret = vfio_group_use_container(device->group);
if (ret)
goto err_module_put;
+ vfio_device_container_register(device);
} else if (device->group->iommufd) {
ret = vfio_iommufd_bind(device, device->group->iommufd);
if (ret)
@@ -792,17 +793,17 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device)
if (ret)
goto err_container;
}
- if (device->group->container)
- vfio_device_container_register(device);
mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
return 0;
err_container:
device->kvm = NULL;
- if (device->group->container)
+ if (device->group->container) {
+ vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
vfio_group_unuse_container(device->group);
- else if (device->group->iommufd)
+ } else if (device->group->iommufd) {
vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
+ }
err_module_put:
mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
@@ -814,15 +815,15 @@ static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device)
lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
- if (device->group->container)
- vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
if (device->ops->close_device)
device->ops->close_device(device);
device->kvm = NULL;
- if (device->group->container)
+ if (device->group->container) {
+ vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
vfio_group_unuse_container(device->group);
- else if (device->group->iommufd)
+ } else if (device->group->iommufd) {
vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH 06/10] vfio: Move device open/close code to be helpfers
2022-12-01 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 05/10] vfio: Swap order of vfio_device_container_register() and open_device() Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-01 14:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-02 5:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 07/10] vfio: Refactor vfio_device open and close Yi Liu
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex.williamson, jgg
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun
This makes vfio_device_open/close() to be the top level helpers for device
open and close. It handles the open_count, and vfio_device_first_open()
vfio_device_last_close() do the container/iommufd use/unuse and the device
open.
Current vfio_device_open() handles the device open and the device file
open which is group specific. After this change, the group specific code
is in the vfio_device_open_file() which would be moved to separate group
source code in future.
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 4f2d32d4a3d0..964d44a35624 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -828,20 +828,41 @@ static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device)
module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
}
-static struct file *vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
+static int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
{
- struct file *filep;
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
device->open_count++;
if (device->open_count == 1) {
ret = vfio_device_first_open(device);
if (ret)
- goto err_unlock;
+ device->open_count--;
}
mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+ vfio_assert_device_open(device);
+ if (device->open_count == 1)
+ vfio_device_last_close(device);
+ device->open_count--;
+ mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+}
+
+static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ struct file *filep;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = vfio_device_open(device);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_out;
+
/*
* We can't use anon_inode_getfd() because we need to modify
* the f_mode flags directly to allow more than just ioctls
@@ -870,12 +891,8 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
return filep;
err_close_device:
- mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
- if (device->open_count == 1)
- vfio_device_last_close(device);
-err_unlock:
- device->open_count--;
- mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+ vfio_device_close(device);
+err_out:
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
@@ -903,7 +920,7 @@ static int vfio_group_ioctl_get_device_fd(struct vfio_group *group,
goto err_put_device;
}
- filep = vfio_device_open(device);
+ filep = vfio_device_open_file(device);
if (IS_ERR(filep)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(filep);
goto err_put_fdno;
@@ -1086,12 +1103,7 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
{
struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
- mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
- vfio_assert_device_open(device);
- if (device->open_count == 1)
- vfio_device_last_close(device);
- device->open_count--;
- mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+ vfio_device_close(device);
vfio_device_put_registration(device);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 06/10] vfio: Move device open/close code to be helpfers
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 06/10] vfio: Move device open/close code to be helpfers Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-02 5:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-12-02 6:37 ` Yi Liu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Tian, Kevin @ 2022-12-02 5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liu, Yi L, alex.williamson@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com
> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 10:56 PM
subject: 'helpfers' -> 'helpers'
>
> This makes vfio_device_open/close() to be the top level helpers for device
> open and close. It handles the open_count, and vfio_device_first_open()
> vfio_device_last_close() do the container/iommufd use/unuse and the
> device
> open.
>
> Current vfio_device_open() handles the device open and the device file
> open which is group specific. After this change, the group specific code
> is in the vfio_device_open_file() which would be moved to separate group
> source code in future.
It's clearer as below:
--
vfio: Make vfio_device_open() truly device specific
Then move group related logic into vfio_device_open_file(). Accordingly
introduce a vfio_device_close() to pair up.
--
With above:
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/10] vfio: Move device open/close code to be helpfers
2022-12-02 5:44 ` Tian, Kevin
@ 2022-12-02 6:37 ` Yi Liu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-02 6:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tian, Kevin, alex.williamson@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com
On 2022/12/2 13:44, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 10:56 PM
>
> subject: 'helpfers' -> 'helpers'
>
>>
>> This makes vfio_device_open/close() to be the top level helpers for device
>> open and close. It handles the open_count, and vfio_device_first_open()
>> vfio_device_last_close() do the container/iommufd use/unuse and the
>> device
>> open.
>>
>> Current vfio_device_open() handles the device open and the device file
>> open which is group specific. After this change, the group specific code
>> is in the vfio_device_open_file() which would be moved to separate group
>> source code in future.
>
> It's clearer as below:
> --
> vfio: Make vfio_device_open() truly device specific
>
> Then move group related logic into vfio_device_open_file(). Accordingly
> introduce a vfio_device_close() to pair up.
> --
>
> With above:
>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
thanks, I'll update your comments into the github branch.
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 07/10] vfio: Refactor vfio_device open and close
2022-12-01 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 06/10] vfio: Move device open/close code to be helpfers Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-01 14:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-02 6:15 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-12-02 21:58 ` Alex Williamson
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 08/10] vfio: Wrap vfio group module init/clean code into helpers Yi Liu
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 2 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex.williamson, jgg
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun
This refactor makes the vfio_device_open() to accept device, iommufd_ctx
pointer and kvm pointer. These parameters are generic items in today's
group path and furute device cdev path. Caller of vfio_device_open() should
take care the necessary protections. e.g. the current group path need to
hold the group_lock to ensure the iommufd_ctx and kvm pointer are valid.
This refactor also wraps the group spefcific codes in the device open and
close paths to be paired helpers like:
- vfio_device_group_open/close(): call vfio_device_open/close()
- vfio_device_group_use/unuse_iommu(): call iommufd or container use/unuse
per iommufd_ctx pointer. Called by
vfio_device_first_open() and
vfio_device_last_close()
Such helpers are supposed to be moved to group.c. While iommufd related codes
will be kept in the generic helpers since future device cdev path also need
to handle iommufd.
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 964d44a35624..6906aa099c0e 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -756,7 +756,38 @@ static bool vfio_assert_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
return !WARN_ON_ONCE(!READ_ONCE(device->open_count));
}
-static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device)
+static int vfio_device_group_use_iommu(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&group->group_lock);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!group->container))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = vfio_group_use_container(group);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ vfio_device_container_register(device);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&group->group_lock);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!group->container))
+ return;
+
+ vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
+ vfio_group_unuse_container(group);
+}
+
+static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd, struct kvm *kvm)
{
int ret;
@@ -765,77 +796,56 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device)
if (!try_module_get(device->dev->driver->owner))
return -ENODEV;
- /*
- * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock. If the
- * device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release it
- * during close_device.
- */
- mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
- if (!vfio_group_has_iommu(device->group)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
+ if (iommufd)
+ ret = vfio_iommufd_bind(device, iommufd);
+ else
+ ret = vfio_device_group_use_iommu(device);
+ if (ret)
goto err_module_put;
- }
- if (device->group->container) {
- ret = vfio_group_use_container(device->group);
- if (ret)
- goto err_module_put;
- vfio_device_container_register(device);
- } else if (device->group->iommufd) {
- ret = vfio_iommufd_bind(device, device->group->iommufd);
- if (ret)
- goto err_module_put;
- }
-
- device->kvm = device->group->kvm;
+ device->kvm = kvm;
if (device->ops->open_device) {
ret = device->ops->open_device(device);
if (ret)
- goto err_container;
+ goto err_unuse_iommu;
}
- mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
return 0;
-err_container:
+err_unuse_iommu:
device->kvm = NULL;
- if (device->group->container) {
- vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
- vfio_group_unuse_container(device->group);
- } else if (device->group->iommufd) {
+ if (iommufd)
vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
- }
+ else
+ vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(device);
err_module_put:
- mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
return ret;
}
-static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device)
+static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device,
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
- mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
if (device->ops->close_device)
device->ops->close_device(device);
device->kvm = NULL;
- if (device->group->container) {
- vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
- vfio_group_unuse_container(device->group);
- } else if (device->group->iommufd) {
+ if (iommufd)
vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
- }
- mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
+ else
+ vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(device);
module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
}
-static int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
+static int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device,
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd, struct kvm *kvm)
{
int ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
device->open_count++;
if (device->open_count == 1) {
- ret = vfio_device_first_open(device);
+ ret = vfio_device_first_open(device, iommufd, kvm);
if (ret)
device->open_count--;
}
@@ -844,22 +854,53 @@ static int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
return ret;
}
-static void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device)
+static void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
{
mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
vfio_assert_device_open(device);
if (device->open_count == 1)
- vfio_device_last_close(device);
+ vfio_device_last_close(device, iommufd);
device->open_count--;
mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
}
+static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
+ if (!vfio_group_has_iommu(device->group)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock. If the
+ * device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release it
+ * during close_device.
+ */
+ ret = vfio_device_open(device, device->group->iommufd,
+ device->group->kvm);
+
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
+ vfio_device_close(device, device->group->iommufd);
+ mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
+}
+
static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
{
struct file *filep;
int ret;
- ret = vfio_device_open(device);
+ ret = vfio_device_group_open(device);
if (ret)
goto err_out;
@@ -891,7 +932,7 @@ static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
return filep;
err_close_device:
- vfio_device_close(device);
+ vfio_device_group_close(device);
err_out:
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
@@ -1103,7 +1144,7 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
{
struct vfio_device *device = filep->private_data;
- vfio_device_close(device);
+ vfio_device_group_close(device);
vfio_device_put_registration(device);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 07/10] vfio: Refactor vfio_device open and close
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 07/10] vfio: Refactor vfio_device open and close Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-02 6:15 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-12-02 6:37 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-02 21:58 ` Alex Williamson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Tian, Kevin @ 2022-12-02 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liu, Yi L, alex.williamson@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com
> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 10:56 PM
>
> This refactor makes the vfio_device_open() to accept device, iommufd_ctx
> pointer and kvm pointer. These parameters are generic items in today's
> group path and furute device cdev path. Caller of vfio_device_open() should
> take care the necessary protections. e.g. the current group path need to
> hold the group_lock to ensure the iommufd_ctx and kvm pointer are valid.
>
> This refactor also wraps the group spefcific codes in the device open and
> close paths to be paired helpers like:
>
> - vfio_device_group_open/close(): call vfio_device_open/close()
> - vfio_device_group_use/unuse_iommu(): call iommufd or container
> use/unuse
this pair is container specific. iommufd vs. container is selected
in vfio_device_first_open().
> @@ -765,77 +796,56 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device
> *device)
> if (!try_module_get(device->dev->driver->owner))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - /*
> - * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock. If
> the
> - * device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release it
> - * during close_device.
> - */
> - mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
> - if (!vfio_group_has_iommu(device->group)) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> + if (iommufd)
> + ret = vfio_iommufd_bind(device, iommufd);
This probably should be renamed to vfio_device_iommufd_bind().
> + else
> + ret = vfio_device_group_use_iommu(device);
what about vfio_device_container_bind()?
Apart from those nits:
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 07/10] vfio: Refactor vfio_device open and close
2022-12-02 6:15 ` Tian, Kevin
@ 2022-12-02 6:37 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-02 15:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-02 6:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tian, Kevin, alex.williamson@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com
On 2022/12/2 14:15, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 10:56 PM
>>
>> This refactor makes the vfio_device_open() to accept device, iommufd_ctx
>> pointer and kvm pointer. These parameters are generic items in today's
>> group path and furute device cdev path. Caller of vfio_device_open() should
>> take care the necessary protections. e.g. the current group path need to
>> hold the group_lock to ensure the iommufd_ctx and kvm pointer are valid.
>>
>> This refactor also wraps the group spefcific codes in the device open and
>> close paths to be paired helpers like:
>>
>> - vfio_device_group_open/close(): call vfio_device_open/close()
>> - vfio_device_group_use/unuse_iommu(): call iommufd or container
>> use/unuse
>
> this pair is container specific. iommufd vs. container is selected
> in vfio_device_first_open().
got it.
>> @@ -765,77 +796,56 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device
>> *device)
>> if (!try_module_get(device->dev->driver->owner))
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> - /*
>> - * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock. If
>> the
>> - * device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release it
>> - * during close_device.
>> - */
>> - mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
>> - if (!vfio_group_has_iommu(device->group)) {
>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> + if (iommufd)
>> + ret = vfio_iommufd_bind(device, iommufd);
>
> This probably should be renamed to vfio_device_iommufd_bind().
I'd like to see if Jason wants to modify it or not as it is
introduced in vfio compat series.
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/6-v4-42cd2eb0e3eb+335a-vfio_iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com/
>
>> + else
>> + ret = vfio_device_group_use_iommu(device);
>
> what about vfio_device_container_bind()?
maybe use_iommu seems suit more. bind is more likely a kind of
associating something with something. but this helper is more kind
of using the container. so I chose use_iommu. But I see the value
of using bind, it would make the two branches aligned.
> Apart from those nits:
>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
thanks.
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 07/10] vfio: Refactor vfio_device open and close
2022-12-02 6:37 ` Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-02 15:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2022-12-02 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yi Liu
Cc: Tian, Kevin, alex.williamson@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 02:37:18PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> On 2022/12/2 14:15, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 10:56 PM
> > >
> > > This refactor makes the vfio_device_open() to accept device, iommufd_ctx
> > > pointer and kvm pointer. These parameters are generic items in today's
> > > group path and furute device cdev path. Caller of vfio_device_open() should
> > > take care the necessary protections. e.g. the current group path need to
> > > hold the group_lock to ensure the iommufd_ctx and kvm pointer are valid.
> > >
> > > This refactor also wraps the group spefcific codes in the device open and
> > > close paths to be paired helpers like:
> > >
> > > - vfio_device_group_open/close(): call vfio_device_open/close()
> > > - vfio_device_group_use/unuse_iommu(): call iommufd or container
> > > use/unuse
> >
> > this pair is container specific. iommufd vs. container is selected
> > in vfio_device_first_open().
>
> got it.
>
> > > @@ -765,77 +796,56 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device
> > > *device)
> > > if (!try_module_get(device->dev->driver->owner))
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > >
> > > - /*
> > > - * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock. If
> > > the
> > > - * device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release it
> > > - * during close_device.
> > > - */
> > > - mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
> > > - if (!vfio_group_has_iommu(device->group)) {
> > > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > > + if (iommufd)
> > > + ret = vfio_iommufd_bind(device, iommufd);
> >
> > This probably should be renamed to vfio_device_iommufd_bind().
>
> I'd like to see if Jason wants to modify it or not as it is
> introduced in vfio compat series.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/6-v4-42cd2eb0e3eb+335a-vfio_iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com/
Ah, it is a bit late, if we want to change it please make a patch
> >
> > > + else
> > > + ret = vfio_device_group_use_iommu(device);
> >
> > what about vfio_device_container_bind()?
>
> maybe use_iommu seems suit more. bind is more likely a kind of
> associating something with something. but this helper is more kind
> of using the container. so I chose use_iommu. But I see the value
> of using bind, it would make the two branches aligned.
I prefer use iommu, "bind" is so vauge
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 07/10] vfio: Refactor vfio_device open and close
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 07/10] vfio: Refactor vfio_device open and close Yi Liu
2022-12-02 6:15 ` Tian, Kevin
@ 2022-12-02 21:58 ` Alex Williamson
2022-12-03 13:46 ` Yi Liu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2022-12-02 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yi Liu
Cc: jgg, kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.y.sun
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 06:55:32 -0800
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> This refactor makes the vfio_device_open() to accept device, iommufd_ctx
> pointer and kvm pointer. These parameters are generic items in today's
> group path and furute device cdev path. Caller of vfio_device_open() should
Minor nit beyond what's already been mentioned here:
s/furute/future/
Thanks,
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 07/10] vfio: Refactor vfio_device open and close
2022-12-02 21:58 ` Alex Williamson
@ 2022-12-03 13:46 ` Yi Liu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-03 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Williamson
Cc: jgg, kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.y.sun
On 2022/12/3 05:58, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 06:55:32 -0800
> Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> This refactor makes the vfio_device_open() to accept device, iommufd_ctx
>> pointer and kvm pointer. These parameters are generic items in today's
>> group path and furute device cdev path. Caller of vfio_device_open() should
>
> Minor nit beyond what's already been mentioned here:
>
> s/furute/future/
>
got it.:-)
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 08/10] vfio: Wrap vfio group module init/clean code into helpers
2022-12-01 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 07/10] vfio: Refactor vfio_device open and close Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-01 14:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 09/10] vfio: Refactor dma APIs for emulated devices Yi Liu
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex.williamson, jgg
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun
This wraps the init/clean code of vfio group global variable to be helpers,
and prepares for further moving vfio group specific code into separate
file.
As container is used by group, so vfio_container_init/cleanup() is moved
into vfio_group_init/cleanup().
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 6906aa099c0e..6e7daed47e97 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -2071,12 +2071,11 @@ static char *vfio_devnode(struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/%s", dev_name(dev));
}
-static int __init vfio_init(void)
+static int __init vfio_group_init(void)
{
int ret;
ida_init(&vfio.group_ida);
- ida_init(&vfio.device_ida);
mutex_init(&vfio.group_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vfio.group_list);
@@ -2093,24 +2092,12 @@ static int __init vfio_init(void)
vfio.class->devnode = vfio_devnode;
- /* /sys/class/vfio-dev/vfioX */
- vfio.device_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "vfio-dev");
- if (IS_ERR(vfio.device_class)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(vfio.device_class);
- goto err_dev_class;
- }
-
ret = alloc_chrdev_region(&vfio.group_devt, 0, MINORMASK + 1, "vfio");
if (ret)
goto err_alloc_chrdev;
-
- pr_info(DRIVER_DESC " version: " DRIVER_VERSION "\n");
return 0;
err_alloc_chrdev:
- class_destroy(vfio.device_class);
- vfio.device_class = NULL;
-err_dev_class:
class_destroy(vfio.class);
vfio.class = NULL;
err_group_class:
@@ -2118,18 +2105,47 @@ static int __init vfio_init(void)
return ret;
}
-static void __exit vfio_cleanup(void)
+static void vfio_group_cleanup(void)
{
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&vfio.group_list));
-
- ida_destroy(&vfio.device_ida);
ida_destroy(&vfio.group_ida);
unregister_chrdev_region(vfio.group_devt, MINORMASK + 1);
- class_destroy(vfio.device_class);
- vfio.device_class = NULL;
class_destroy(vfio.class);
- vfio_container_cleanup();
vfio.class = NULL;
+ vfio_container_cleanup();
+}
+
+static int __init vfio_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ida_init(&vfio.device_ida);
+
+ ret = vfio_group_init();
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* /sys/class/vfio-dev/vfioX */
+ vfio.device_class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "vfio-dev");
+ if (IS_ERR(vfio.device_class)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(vfio.device_class);
+ goto err_dev_class;
+ }
+
+ pr_info(DRIVER_DESC " version: " DRIVER_VERSION "\n");
+ return 0;
+
+err_dev_class:
+ vfio_group_cleanup();
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void __exit vfio_cleanup(void)
+{
+ ida_destroy(&vfio.device_ida);
+ class_destroy(vfio.device_class);
+ vfio.device_class = NULL;
+ vfio_group_cleanup();
xa_destroy(&vfio_device_set_xa);
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH 09/10] vfio: Refactor dma APIs for emulated devices
2022-12-01 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 08/10] vfio: Wrap vfio group module init/clean code into helpers Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-01 14:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 10/10] vfio: Move vfio group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
2022-12-01 20:39 ` [PATCH 00/10] Move " Jason Gunthorpe
10 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex.williamson, jgg
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun
To use group helpers instead of opening group related code in the
API. This prepares moving group specific code out of vfio_main.c.
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/vfio/container.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
drivers/vfio/vfio.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/container.c b/drivers/vfio/container.c
index 6b362d97d682..b7a9560ab25e 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/container.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/container.c
@@ -540,10 +540,12 @@ void vfio_group_unuse_container(struct vfio_group *group)
fput(group->opened_file);
}
-int vfio_container_pin_pages(struct vfio_container *container,
- struct iommu_group *iommu_group, dma_addr_t iova,
- int npage, int prot, struct page **pages)
+int vfio_device_container_pin_pages(struct vfio_device *device,
+ dma_addr_t iova, int npage,
+ int prot, struct page **pages)
{
+ struct vfio_container *container = device->group->container;
+ struct iommu_group *iommu_group = device->group->iommu_group;
struct vfio_iommu_driver *driver = container->iommu_driver;
if (npage > VFIO_PIN_PAGES_MAX_ENTRIES)
@@ -555,9 +557,11 @@ int vfio_container_pin_pages(struct vfio_container *container,
npage, prot, pages);
}
-void vfio_container_unpin_pages(struct vfio_container *container,
- dma_addr_t iova, int npage)
+void vfio_device_container_unpin_pages(struct vfio_device *device,
+ dma_addr_t iova, int npage)
{
+ struct vfio_container *container = device->group->container;
+
if (WARN_ON(npage <= 0 || npage > VFIO_PIN_PAGES_MAX_ENTRIES))
return;
@@ -565,9 +569,11 @@ void vfio_container_unpin_pages(struct vfio_container *container,
npage);
}
-int vfio_container_dma_rw(struct vfio_container *container, dma_addr_t iova,
- void *data, size_t len, bool write)
+int vfio_device_container_dma_rw(struct vfio_device *device,
+ dma_addr_t iova, void *data,
+ size_t len, bool write)
{
+ struct vfio_container *container = device->group->container;
struct vfio_iommu_driver *driver = container->iommu_driver;
if (unlikely(!driver || !driver->ops->dma_rw))
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index ce5fe3fc493b..a112e8f2b291 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -122,13 +122,14 @@ int vfio_container_attach_group(struct vfio_container *container,
void vfio_group_detach_container(struct vfio_group *group);
void vfio_device_container_register(struct vfio_device *device);
void vfio_device_container_unregister(struct vfio_device *device);
-int vfio_container_pin_pages(struct vfio_container *container,
- struct iommu_group *iommu_group, dma_addr_t iova,
- int npage, int prot, struct page **pages);
-void vfio_container_unpin_pages(struct vfio_container *container,
- dma_addr_t iova, int npage);
-int vfio_container_dma_rw(struct vfio_container *container, dma_addr_t iova,
- void *data, size_t len, bool write);
+int vfio_device_container_pin_pages(struct vfio_device *device,
+ dma_addr_t iova, int npage,
+ int prot, struct page **pages);
+void vfio_device_container_unpin_pages(struct vfio_device *device,
+ dma_addr_t iova, int npage);
+int vfio_device_container_dma_rw(struct vfio_device *device,
+ dma_addr_t iova, void *data,
+ size_t len, bool write);
int __init vfio_container_init(void);
void vfio_container_cleanup(void);
@@ -166,22 +167,21 @@ static inline void vfio_device_container_unregister(struct vfio_device *device)
{
}
-static inline int vfio_container_pin_pages(struct vfio_container *container,
- struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
- dma_addr_t iova, int npage, int prot,
- struct page **pages)
+static inline int vfio_device_container_pin_pages(struct vfio_device *device,
+ dma_addr_t iova, int npage,
+ int prot, struct page **pages)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
-static inline void vfio_container_unpin_pages(struct vfio_container *container,
- dma_addr_t iova, int npage)
+static inline void vfio_device_container_unpin_pages(struct vfio_device *device,
+ dma_addr_t iova, int npage)
{
}
-static inline int vfio_container_dma_rw(struct vfio_container *container,
- dma_addr_t iova, void *data, size_t len,
- bool write)
+static inline int vfio_device_container_dma_rw(struct vfio_device *device,
+ dma_addr_t iova, void *data,
+ size_t len, bool write)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 6e7daed47e97..11fe044e8703 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -1943,6 +1943,11 @@ int vfio_set_irqs_validate_and_prepare(struct vfio_irq_set *hdr, int num_irqs,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfio_set_irqs_validate_and_prepare);
+static bool vfio_device_has_container(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ return device->group->container;
+}
+
/*
* Pin contiguous user pages and return their associated host pages for local
* domain only.
@@ -1955,7 +1960,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfio_set_irqs_validate_and_prepare);
* Return error or number of pages pinned.
*
* A driver may only call this function if the vfio_device was created
- * by vfio_register_emulated_iommu_dev() due to vfio_container_pin_pages().
+ * by vfio_register_emulated_iommu_dev() due to vfio_device_container_pin_pages().
*/
int vfio_pin_pages(struct vfio_device *device, dma_addr_t iova,
int npage, int prot, struct page **pages)
@@ -1963,10 +1968,9 @@ int vfio_pin_pages(struct vfio_device *device, dma_addr_t iova,
/* group->container cannot change while a vfio device is open */
if (!pages || !npage || WARN_ON(!vfio_assert_device_open(device)))
return -EINVAL;
- if (device->group->container)
- return vfio_container_pin_pages(device->group->container,
- device->group->iommu_group,
- iova, npage, prot, pages);
+ if (vfio_device_has_container(device))
+ return vfio_device_container_pin_pages(device, iova,
+ npage, prot, pages);
if (device->iommufd_access) {
int ret;
@@ -2002,9 +2006,8 @@ void vfio_unpin_pages(struct vfio_device *device, dma_addr_t iova, int npage)
if (WARN_ON(!vfio_assert_device_open(device)))
return;
- if (device->group->container) {
- vfio_container_unpin_pages(device->group->container, iova,
- npage);
+ if (vfio_device_has_container(device)) {
+ vfio_device_container_unpin_pages(device, iova, npage);
return;
}
if (device->iommufd_access) {
@@ -2041,9 +2044,9 @@ int vfio_dma_rw(struct vfio_device *device, dma_addr_t iova, void *data,
if (!data || len <= 0 || !vfio_assert_device_open(device))
return -EINVAL;
- if (device->group->container)
- return vfio_container_dma_rw(device->group->container, iova,
- data, len, write);
+ if (vfio_device_has_container(device))
+ return vfio_device_container_dma_rw(device, iova,
+ data, len, write);
if (device->iommufd_access) {
unsigned int flags = 0;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* [PATCH 10/10] vfio: Move vfio group specific code into group.c
2022-12-01 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 09/10] vfio: Refactor dma APIs for emulated devices Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-01 14:55 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-02 6:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-12-01 20:39 ` [PATCH 00/10] Move " Jason Gunthorpe
10 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-01 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alex.williamson, jgg
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.l.liu, yi.y.sun
This prepares for compiling out vfio group after vfio device cdev is
added. No vfio_group decode code should be in vfio_main.c, and neither
device->group reference should be in vfio_main.c.
No functional change is intended.
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/vfio/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/vfio/group.c | 877 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/vfio/vfio.h | 22 +
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 877 +--------------------------------------
4 files changed, 907 insertions(+), 870 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/group.c
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Makefile b/drivers/vfio/Makefile
index b953517dc70f..3783db7e8082 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/vfio/Makefile
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ vfio_virqfd-y := virqfd.o
obj-$(CONFIG_VFIO) += vfio.o
vfio-y += vfio_main.o \
+ group.o \
iova_bitmap.o
vfio-$(CONFIG_IOMMUFD) += iommufd.o
vfio-$(CONFIG_VFIO_CONTAINER) += container.o
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c5d8bf10495e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
@@ -0,0 +1,877 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * VFIO core
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ * Author: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
+ *
+ * Derived from original vfio:
+ * Copyright 2010 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ * Author: Tom Lyon, pugs@cisco.com
+ */
+
+#include <linux/vfio.h>
+#include <linux/iommufd.h>
+#include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
+#include "vfio.h"
+
+static struct vfio {
+ struct class *class;
+ struct list_head group_list;
+ struct mutex group_lock; /* locks group_list */
+ struct ida group_ida;
+ dev_t group_devt;
+} vfio;
+
+static struct vfio_device *vfio_device_get_from_name(struct vfio_group *group,
+ char *buf)
+{
+ struct vfio_device *it, *device = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
+
+ mutex_lock(&group->device_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(it, &group->device_list, group_next) {
+ int ret;
+
+ if (it->ops->match) {
+ ret = it->ops->match(it, buf);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ device = ERR_PTR(ret);
+ break;
+ }
+ } else {
+ ret = !strcmp(dev_name(it->dev), buf);
+ }
+
+ if (ret && vfio_device_try_get_registration(it)) {
+ device = it;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
+
+ return device;
+}
+
+/*
+ * VFIO Group fd, /dev/vfio/$GROUP
+ */
+static bool vfio_group_has_iommu(struct vfio_group *group)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&group->group_lock);
+ /*
+ * There can only be users if there is a container, and if there is a
+ * container there must be users.
+ */
+ WARN_ON(!group->container != !group->container_users);
+
+ return group->container || group->iommufd;
+}
+
+/*
+ * VFIO_GROUP_UNSET_CONTAINER should fail if there are other users or
+ * if there was no container to unset. Since the ioctl is called on
+ * the group, we know that still exists, therefore the only valid
+ * transition here is 1->0.
+ */
+static int vfio_group_ioctl_unset_container(struct vfio_group *group)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
+ if (!vfio_group_has_iommu(group)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+ if (group->container) {
+ if (group->container_users != 1) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+ vfio_group_detach_container(group);
+ }
+ if (group->iommufd) {
+ iommufd_ctx_put(group->iommufd);
+ group->iommufd = NULL;
+ }
+
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int vfio_group_ioctl_set_container(struct vfio_group *group,
+ int __user *arg)
+{
+ struct vfio_container *container;
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd;
+ struct fd f;
+ int ret;
+ int fd;
+
+ if (get_user(fd, arg))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ f = fdget(fd);
+ if (!f.file)
+ return -EBADF;
+
+ mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
+ if (vfio_group_has_iommu(group)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+ if (!group->iommu_group) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ container = vfio_container_from_file(f.file);
+ if (container) {
+ ret = vfio_container_attach_group(container, group);
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ iommufd = iommufd_ctx_from_file(f.file);
+ if (!IS_ERR(iommufd)) {
+ u32 ioas_id;
+
+ ret = iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_id(iommufd, &ioas_id);
+ if (ret) {
+ iommufd_ctx_put(group->iommufd);
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ group->iommufd = iommufd;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ /* The FD passed is not recognized. */
+ ret = -EBADFD;
+
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
+ fdput(f);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
+ if (!vfio_group_has_iommu(device->group)) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock. If the
+ * device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release it
+ * during close_device.
+ */
+ ret = vfio_device_open(device, device->group->iommufd,
+ device->group->kvm);
+
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
+ vfio_device_close(device, device->group->iommufd);
+ mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
+}
+
+static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ struct file *filep;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = vfio_device_group_open(device);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_out;
+
+ /*
+ * We can't use anon_inode_getfd() because we need to modify
+ * the f_mode flags directly to allow more than just ioctls
+ */
+ filep = anon_inode_getfile("[vfio-device]", &vfio_device_fops,
+ device, O_RDWR);
+ if (IS_ERR(filep)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(filep);
+ goto err_close_device;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * TODO: add an anon_inode interface to do this.
+ * Appears to be missing by lack of need rather than
+ * explicitly prevented. Now there's need.
+ */
+ filep->f_mode |= (FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE);
+
+ if (device->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU)
+ dev_warn(device->dev, "vfio-noiommu device opened by user "
+ "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
+ /*
+ * On success the ref of device is moved to the file and
+ * put in vfio_device_fops_release()
+ */
+ return filep;
+
+err_close_device:
+ vfio_device_group_close(device);
+err_out:
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+}
+
+static int vfio_group_ioctl_get_device_fd(struct vfio_group *group,
+ char __user *arg)
+{
+ struct vfio_device *device;
+ struct file *filep;
+ char *buf;
+ int fdno;
+ int ret;
+
+ buf = strndup_user(arg, PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (IS_ERR(buf))
+ return PTR_ERR(buf);
+
+ device = vfio_device_get_from_name(group, buf);
+ kfree(buf);
+ if (IS_ERR(device))
+ return PTR_ERR(device);
+
+ fdno = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
+ if (fdno < 0) {
+ ret = fdno;
+ goto err_put_device;
+ }
+
+ filep = vfio_device_open_file(device);
+ if (IS_ERR(filep)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(filep);
+ goto err_put_fdno;
+ }
+
+ fd_install(fdno, filep);
+ return fdno;
+
+err_put_fdno:
+ put_unused_fd(fdno);
+err_put_device:
+ vfio_device_put_registration(device);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int vfio_group_ioctl_get_status(struct vfio_group *group,
+ struct vfio_group_status __user *arg)
+{
+ unsigned long minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_group_status, flags);
+ struct vfio_group_status status;
+
+ if (copy_from_user(&status, arg, minsz))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ if (status.argsz < minsz)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ status.flags = 0;
+
+ mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
+ if (!group->iommu_group) {
+ mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * With the container FD the iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() is done
+ * during SET_CONTAINER but for IOMMFD this is done during
+ * VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD. Meaning that with iommufd
+ * VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_VIABLE could be set but GET_DEVICE_FD will fail due
+ * to viability.
+ */
+ if (vfio_group_has_iommu(group))
+ status.flags |= VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_CONTAINER_SET |
+ VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_VIABLE;
+ else if (!iommu_group_dma_owner_claimed(group->iommu_group))
+ status.flags |= VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_VIABLE;
+ mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
+
+ if (copy_to_user(arg, &status, minsz))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static long vfio_group_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
+ unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group = filep->private_data;
+ void __user *uarg = (void __user *)arg;
+
+ switch (cmd) {
+ case VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD:
+ return vfio_group_ioctl_get_device_fd(group, uarg);
+ case VFIO_GROUP_GET_STATUS:
+ return vfio_group_ioctl_get_status(group, uarg);
+ case VFIO_GROUP_SET_CONTAINER:
+ return vfio_group_ioctl_set_container(group, uarg);
+ case VFIO_GROUP_UNSET_CONTAINER:
+ return vfio_group_ioctl_unset_container(group);
+ default:
+ return -ENOTTY;
+ }
+}
+
+static int vfio_group_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group =
+ container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct vfio_group, cdev);
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * drivers can be zero if this races with vfio_device_remove_group(), it
+ * will be stable at 0 under the group rwsem
+ */
+ if (refcount_read(&group->drivers) == 0) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ if (group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) {
+ ret = -EPERM;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Do we need multiple instances of the group open? Seems not.
+ */
+ if (group->opened_file) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+ group->opened_file = filep;
+ filep->private_data = group;
+ ret = 0;
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int vfio_group_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group = filep->private_data;
+
+ filep->private_data = NULL;
+
+ mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
+ /*
+ * Device FDs hold a group file reference, therefore the group release
+ * is only called when there are no open devices.
+ */
+ WARN_ON(group->notifier.head);
+ if (group->container)
+ vfio_group_detach_container(group);
+ if (group->iommufd) {
+ iommufd_ctx_put(group->iommufd);
+ group->iommufd = NULL;
+ }
+ group->opened_file = NULL;
+ mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations vfio_group_fops = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .unlocked_ioctl = vfio_group_fops_unl_ioctl,
+ .compat_ioctl = compat_ptr_ioctl,
+ .open = vfio_group_fops_open,
+ .release = vfio_group_fops_release,
+};
+
+/*
+ * Group objects - create, release, get, put, search
+ */
+static struct vfio_group *
+vfio_group_find_from_iommu(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&vfio.group_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * group->iommu_group from the vfio.group_list cannot be NULL
+ * under the vfio.group_lock.
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry(group, &vfio.group_list, vfio_next) {
+ if (group->iommu_group == iommu_group)
+ return group;
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void vfio_group_release(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group = container_of(dev, struct vfio_group, dev);
+
+ mutex_destroy(&group->device_lock);
+ mutex_destroy(&group->group_lock);
+ WARN_ON(group->iommu_group);
+ ida_free(&vfio.group_ida, MINOR(group->dev.devt));
+ kfree(group);
+}
+
+static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_alloc(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
+ enum vfio_group_type type)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group;
+ int minor;
+
+ group = kzalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!group)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ minor = ida_alloc_max(&vfio.group_ida, MINORMASK, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (minor < 0) {
+ kfree(group);
+ return ERR_PTR(minor);
+ }
+
+ device_initialize(&group->dev);
+ group->dev.devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(vfio.group_devt), minor);
+ group->dev.class = vfio.class;
+ group->dev.release = vfio_group_release;
+ cdev_init(&group->cdev, &vfio_group_fops);
+ group->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+
+ refcount_set(&group->drivers, 1);
+ mutex_init(&group->group_lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->device_list);
+ mutex_init(&group->device_lock);
+ group->iommu_group = iommu_group;
+ /* put in vfio_group_release() */
+ iommu_group_ref_get(iommu_group);
+ group->type = type;
+ BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&group->notifier);
+
+ return group;
+}
+
+static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
+ enum vfio_group_type type)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group;
+ struct vfio_group *ret;
+ int err;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&vfio.group_lock);
+
+ group = vfio_group_alloc(iommu_group, type);
+ if (IS_ERR(group))
+ return group;
+
+ err = dev_set_name(&group->dev, "%s%d",
+ group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU ? "noiommu-" : "",
+ iommu_group_id(iommu_group));
+ if (err) {
+ ret = ERR_PTR(err);
+ goto err_put;
+ }
+
+ err = cdev_device_add(&group->cdev, &group->dev);
+ if (err) {
+ ret = ERR_PTR(err);
+ goto err_put;
+ }
+
+ list_add(&group->vfio_next, &vfio.group_list);
+
+ return group;
+
+err_put:
+ put_device(&group->dev);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev,
+ enum vfio_group_type type)
+{
+ struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
+ struct vfio_group *group;
+ int ret;
+
+ iommu_group = iommu_group_alloc();
+ if (IS_ERR(iommu_group))
+ return ERR_CAST(iommu_group);
+
+ ret = iommu_group_set_name(iommu_group, "vfio-noiommu");
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_put_group;
+ ret = iommu_group_add_device(iommu_group, dev);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_put_group;
+
+ mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
+ group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, type);
+ mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
+ if (IS_ERR(group)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(group);
+ goto out_remove_device;
+ }
+ iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
+ return group;
+
+out_remove_device:
+ iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
+out_put_group:
+ iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+}
+
+static bool vfio_group_has_device(struct vfio_group *group, struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct vfio_device *device;
+
+ mutex_lock(&group->device_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(device, &group->device_list, group_next) {
+ if (device->dev == dev) {
+ mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
+ return false;
+}
+
+static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
+ struct vfio_group *group;
+
+ iommu_group = iommu_group_get(dev);
+ if (!iommu_group && vfio_noiommu) {
+ /*
+ * With noiommu enabled, create an IOMMU group for devices that
+ * don't already have one, implying no IOMMU hardware/driver
+ * exists. Taint the kernel because we're about to give a DMA
+ * capable device to a user without IOMMU protection.
+ */
+ group = vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(dev, VFIO_NO_IOMMU);
+ if (!IS_ERR(group)) {
+ add_taint(TAINT_USER, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
+ dev_warn(dev, "Adding kernel taint for vfio-noiommu group on device\n");
+ }
+ return group;
+ }
+
+ if (!iommu_group)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+ /*
+ * VFIO always sets IOMMU_CACHE because we offer no way for userspace to
+ * restore cache coherency. It has to be checked here because it is only
+ * valid for cases where we are using iommu groups.
+ */
+ if (!device_iommu_capable(dev, IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY)) {
+ iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ }
+
+ mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
+ group = vfio_group_find_from_iommu(iommu_group);
+ if (group) {
+ if (WARN_ON(vfio_group_has_device(group, dev)))
+ group = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ else
+ refcount_inc(&group->drivers);
+ } else {
+ group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, VFIO_IOMMU);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
+
+ /* The vfio_group holds a reference to the iommu_group */
+ iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
+ return group;
+}
+
+int vfio_device_set_group(struct vfio_device *device,
+ enum vfio_group_type type)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group;
+
+ if (type == VFIO_IOMMU)
+ group = vfio_group_find_or_alloc(device->dev);
+ else
+ group = vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(device->dev, type);
+
+ if (IS_ERR(group))
+ return PTR_ERR(group);
+
+ /* Our reference on group is moved to the device */
+ device->group = group;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void vfio_device_remove_group(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
+ struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
+
+ if (group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU || group->type == VFIO_EMULATED_IOMMU)
+ iommu_group_remove_device(device->dev);
+
+ /* Pairs with vfio_create_group() / vfio_group_get_from_iommu() */
+ if (!refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(&group->drivers, &vfio.group_lock))
+ return;
+ list_del(&group->vfio_next);
+
+ /*
+ * We could concurrently probe another driver in the group that might
+ * race vfio_device_remove_group() with vfio_get_group(), so we have to
+ * ensure that the sysfs is all cleaned up under lock otherwise the
+ * cdev_device_add() will fail due to the name aready existing.
+ */
+ cdev_device_del(&group->cdev, &group->dev);
+
+ mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
+ /*
+ * These data structures all have paired operations that can only be
+ * undone when the caller holds a live reference on the device. Since
+ * all pairs must be undone these WARN_ON's indicate some caller did not
+ * properly hold the group reference.
+ */
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&group->device_list));
+ WARN_ON(group->notifier.head);
+
+ /*
+ * Revoke all users of group->iommu_group. At this point we know there
+ * are no devices active because we are unplugging the last one. Setting
+ * iommu_group to NULL blocks all new users.
+ */
+ if (group->container)
+ vfio_group_detach_container(group);
+ iommu_group = group->iommu_group;
+ group->iommu_group = NULL;
+ mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
+
+ iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
+ put_device(&group->dev);
+}
+
+void vfio_device_group_register(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&device->group->device_lock);
+ list_add(&device->group_next, &device->group->device_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&device->group->device_lock);
+}
+
+void vfio_device_group_unregister(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&device->group->device_lock);
+ list_del(&device->group_next);
+ mutex_unlock(&device->group->device_lock);
+}
+
+int vfio_device_group_use_iommu(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&group->group_lock);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!group->container))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = vfio_group_use_container(group);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ vfio_device_container_register(device);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&group->group_lock);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!group->container))
+ return;
+
+ vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
+ vfio_group_unuse_container(group);
+}
+
+bool vfio_device_has_container(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ return device->group->container;
+}
+
+/**
+ * vfio_file_iommu_group - Return the struct iommu_group for the vfio group file
+ * @file: VFIO group file
+ *
+ * The returned iommu_group is valid as long as a ref is held on the file. This
+ * returns a reference on the group. This function is deprecated, only the SPAPR
+ * path in kvm should call it.
+ */
+struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
+ struct iommu_group *iommu_group = NULL;
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU))
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
+ return NULL;
+
+ mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
+ if (group->iommu_group) {
+ iommu_group = group->iommu_group;
+ iommu_group_ref_get(iommu_group);
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
+ return iommu_group;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_iommu_group);
+
+/**
+ * vfio_file_is_group - True if the file is usable with VFIO aPIS
+ * @file: VFIO group file
+ */
+bool vfio_file_is_group(struct file *file)
+{
+ return file->f_op == &vfio_group_fops;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_is_group);
+
+/**
+ * vfio_file_enforced_coherent - True if the DMA associated with the VFIO file
+ * is always CPU cache coherent
+ * @file: VFIO group file
+ *
+ * Enforced coherency means that the IOMMU ignores things like the PCIe no-snoop
+ * bit in DMA transactions. A return of false indicates that the user has
+ * rights to access additional instructions such as wbinvd on x86.
+ */
+bool vfio_file_enforced_coherent(struct file *file)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
+ struct vfio_device *device;
+ bool ret = true;
+
+ if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * If the device does not have IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY then
+ * any domain later attached to it will also not support it. If the cap
+ * is set then the iommu_domain eventually attached to the device/group
+ * must use a domain with enforce_cache_coherency().
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&group->device_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(device, &group->device_list, group_next) {
+ if (!device_iommu_capable(device->dev,
+ IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY)) {
+ ret = false;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_enforced_coherent);
+
+/**
+ * vfio_file_set_kvm - Link a kvm with VFIO drivers
+ * @file: VFIO group file
+ * @kvm: KVM to link
+ *
+ * When a VFIO device is first opened the KVM will be available in
+ * device->kvm if one was associated with the group.
+ */
+void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
+
+ if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
+ return;
+
+ mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
+ group->kvm = kvm;
+ mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_set_kvm);
+
+/**
+ * vfio_file_has_dev - True if the VFIO file is a handle for device
+ * @file: VFIO file to check
+ * @device: Device that must be part of the file
+ *
+ * Returns true if given file has permission to manipulate the given device.
+ */
+bool vfio_file_has_dev(struct file *file, struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
+
+ if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
+ return false;
+
+ return group == device->group;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_has_dev);
+
+static char *vfio_devnode(struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
+{
+ return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/%s", dev_name(dev));
+}
+
+int __init vfio_group_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ida_init(&vfio.group_ida);
+ mutex_init(&vfio.group_lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vfio.group_list);
+
+ ret = vfio_container_init();
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* /dev/vfio/$GROUP */
+ vfio.class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "vfio");
+ if (IS_ERR(vfio.class)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(vfio.class);
+ goto err_group_class;
+ }
+
+ vfio.class->devnode = vfio_devnode;
+
+ ret = alloc_chrdev_region(&vfio.group_devt, 0, MINORMASK + 1, "vfio");
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_alloc_chrdev;
+ return 0;
+
+err_alloc_chrdev:
+ class_destroy(vfio.class);
+ vfio.class = NULL;
+err_group_class:
+ vfio_container_cleanup();
+ return ret;
+}
+
+void vfio_group_cleanup(void)
+{
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&vfio.group_list));
+ ida_destroy(&vfio.group_ida);
+ unregister_chrdev_region(vfio.group_devt, MINORMASK + 1);
+ class_destroy(vfio.class);
+ vfio.class = NULL;
+ vfio_container_cleanup();
+}
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index a112e8f2b291..2e05418fd18d 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#ifndef __VFIO_VFIO_H__
#define __VFIO_VFIO_H__
+#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/cdev.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -15,6 +16,15 @@ struct iommu_group;
struct vfio_device;
struct vfio_container;
+void vfio_device_put_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
+bool vfio_device_try_get_registration(struct vfio_device *device);
+int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device,
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd, struct kvm *kvm);
+void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd);
+
+extern const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops;
+
enum vfio_group_type {
/*
* Physical device with IOMMU backing.
@@ -66,6 +76,18 @@ struct vfio_group {
struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd;
};
+int vfio_device_set_group(struct vfio_device *device,
+ enum vfio_group_type type);
+void vfio_device_remove_group(struct vfio_device *device);
+void vfio_device_group_register(struct vfio_device *device);
+void vfio_device_group_unregister(struct vfio_device *device);
+int vfio_device_group_use_iommu(struct vfio_device *device);
+void vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(struct vfio_device *device);
+void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device);
+bool vfio_device_has_container(struct vfio_device *device);
+int __init vfio_group_init(void);
+void vfio_group_cleanup(void);
+
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_CONTAINER)
/* events for the backend driver notify callback */
enum vfio_iommu_notify_type {
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 11fe044e8703..e89971651d34 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -13,8 +13,6 @@
#include <linux/cdev.h>
#include <linux/compat.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
-#include <linux/file.h>
-#include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/idr.h>
#include <linux/iommu.h>
@@ -43,17 +41,11 @@
#define DRIVER_DESC "VFIO - User Level meta-driver"
static struct vfio {
- struct class *class;
- struct list_head group_list;
- struct mutex group_lock; /* locks group_list */
- struct ida group_ida;
- dev_t group_devt;
struct class *device_class;
struct ida device_ida;
} vfio;
static DEFINE_XARRAY(vfio_device_set_xa);
-static const struct file_operations vfio_group_fops;
int vfio_assign_device_set(struct vfio_device *device, void *set_id)
{
@@ -126,168 +118,17 @@ static void vfio_release_device_set(struct vfio_device *device)
xa_unlock(&vfio_device_set_xa);
}
-/*
- * Group objects - create, release, get, put, search
- */
-static struct vfio_group *
-vfio_group_find_from_iommu(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group;
-
- lockdep_assert_held(&vfio.group_lock);
-
- /*
- * group->iommu_group from the vfio.group_list cannot be NULL
- * under the vfio.group_lock.
- */
- list_for_each_entry(group, &vfio.group_list, vfio_next) {
- if (group->iommu_group == iommu_group)
- return group;
- }
- return NULL;
-}
-
-static void vfio_group_release(struct device *dev)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group = container_of(dev, struct vfio_group, dev);
-
- mutex_destroy(&group->device_lock);
- mutex_destroy(&group->group_lock);
- WARN_ON(group->iommu_group);
- ida_free(&vfio.group_ida, MINOR(group->dev.devt));
- kfree(group);
-}
-
-static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_alloc(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
- enum vfio_group_type type)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group;
- int minor;
-
- group = kzalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!group)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-
- minor = ida_alloc_max(&vfio.group_ida, MINORMASK, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (minor < 0) {
- kfree(group);
- return ERR_PTR(minor);
- }
-
- device_initialize(&group->dev);
- group->dev.devt = MKDEV(MAJOR(vfio.group_devt), minor);
- group->dev.class = vfio.class;
- group->dev.release = vfio_group_release;
- cdev_init(&group->cdev, &vfio_group_fops);
- group->cdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
-
- refcount_set(&group->drivers, 1);
- mutex_init(&group->group_lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->device_list);
- mutex_init(&group->device_lock);
- group->iommu_group = iommu_group;
- /* put in vfio_group_release() */
- iommu_group_ref_get(iommu_group);
- group->type = type;
- BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&group->notifier);
-
- return group;
-}
-
-static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
- enum vfio_group_type type)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group;
- struct vfio_group *ret;
- int err;
-
- lockdep_assert_held(&vfio.group_lock);
-
- group = vfio_group_alloc(iommu_group, type);
- if (IS_ERR(group))
- return group;
-
- err = dev_set_name(&group->dev, "%s%d",
- group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU ? "noiommu-" : "",
- iommu_group_id(iommu_group));
- if (err) {
- ret = ERR_PTR(err);
- goto err_put;
- }
-
- err = cdev_device_add(&group->cdev, &group->dev);
- if (err) {
- ret = ERR_PTR(err);
- goto err_put;
- }
-
- list_add(&group->vfio_next, &vfio.group_list);
-
- return group;
-
-err_put:
- put_device(&group->dev);
- return ret;
-}
-
-static void vfio_device_remove_group(struct vfio_device *device)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
- struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
-
- if (group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU || group->type == VFIO_EMULATED_IOMMU)
- iommu_group_remove_device(device->dev);
-
- /* Pairs with vfio_create_group() / vfio_group_get_from_iommu() */
- if (!refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(&group->drivers, &vfio.group_lock))
- return;
- list_del(&group->vfio_next);
-
- /*
- * We could concurrently probe another driver in the group that might
- * race vfio_device_remove_group() with vfio_get_group(), so we have to
- * ensure that the sysfs is all cleaned up under lock otherwise the
- * cdev_device_add() will fail due to the name aready existing.
- */
- cdev_device_del(&group->cdev, &group->dev);
-
- mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
- /*
- * These data structures all have paired operations that can only be
- * undone when the caller holds a live reference on the device. Since
- * all pairs must be undone these WARN_ON's indicate some caller did not
- * properly hold the group reference.
- */
- WARN_ON(!list_empty(&group->device_list));
- WARN_ON(group->notifier.head);
-
- /*
- * Revoke all users of group->iommu_group. At this point we know there
- * are no devices active because we are unplugging the last one. Setting
- * iommu_group to NULL blocks all new users.
- */
- if (group->container)
- vfio_group_detach_container(group);
- iommu_group = group->iommu_group;
- group->iommu_group = NULL;
- mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
- mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
-
- iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
- put_device(&group->dev);
-}
-
/*
* Device objects - create, release, get, put, search
*/
/* Device reference always implies a group reference */
-static void vfio_device_put_registration(struct vfio_device *device)
+void vfio_device_put_registration(struct vfio_device *device)
{
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&device->refcount))
complete(&device->comp);
}
-static bool vfio_device_try_get_registration(struct vfio_device *device)
+bool vfio_device_try_get_registration(struct vfio_device *device)
{
return refcount_inc_not_zero(&device->refcount);
}
@@ -386,139 +227,6 @@ static int vfio_init_device(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
return ret;
}
-static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev,
- enum vfio_group_type type)
-{
- struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
- struct vfio_group *group;
- int ret;
-
- iommu_group = iommu_group_alloc();
- if (IS_ERR(iommu_group))
- return ERR_CAST(iommu_group);
-
- ret = iommu_group_set_name(iommu_group, "vfio-noiommu");
- if (ret)
- goto out_put_group;
- ret = iommu_group_add_device(iommu_group, dev);
- if (ret)
- goto out_put_group;
-
- mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
- group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, type);
- mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
- if (IS_ERR(group)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(group);
- goto out_remove_device;
- }
- iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
- return group;
-
-out_remove_device:
- iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
-out_put_group:
- iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
-}
-
-static bool vfio_group_has_device(struct vfio_group *group, struct device *dev)
-{
- struct vfio_device *device;
-
- mutex_lock(&group->device_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(device, &group->device_list, group_next) {
- if (device->dev == dev) {
- mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
- return true;
- }
- }
- mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
- return false;
-}
-
-static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
-{
- struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
- struct vfio_group *group;
-
- iommu_group = iommu_group_get(dev);
- if (!iommu_group && vfio_noiommu) {
- /*
- * With noiommu enabled, create an IOMMU group for devices that
- * don't already have one, implying no IOMMU hardware/driver
- * exists. Taint the kernel because we're about to give a DMA
- * capable device to a user without IOMMU protection.
- */
- group = vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(dev, VFIO_NO_IOMMU);
- if (!IS_ERR(group)) {
- add_taint(TAINT_USER, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
- dev_warn(dev, "Adding kernel taint for vfio-noiommu group on device\n");
- }
- return group;
- }
-
- if (!iommu_group)
- return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-
- /*
- * VFIO always sets IOMMU_CACHE because we offer no way for userspace to
- * restore cache coherency. It has to be checked here because it is only
- * valid for cases where we are using iommu groups.
- */
- if (!device_iommu_capable(dev, IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY)) {
- iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
- return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- }
-
- mutex_lock(&vfio.group_lock);
- group = vfio_group_find_from_iommu(iommu_group);
- if (group) {
- if (WARN_ON(vfio_group_has_device(group, dev)))
- group = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- else
- refcount_inc(&group->drivers);
- } else {
- group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, VFIO_IOMMU);
- }
- mutex_unlock(&vfio.group_lock);
-
- /* The vfio_group holds a reference to the iommu_group */
- iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
- return group;
-}
-
-static void vfio_device_group_register(struct vfio_device *device)
-{
- mutex_lock(&device->group->device_lock);
- list_add(&device->group_next, &device->group->device_list);
- mutex_unlock(&device->group->device_lock);
-}
-
-static void vfio_device_group_unregister(struct vfio_device *device)
-{
- mutex_lock(&device->group->device_lock);
- list_del(&device->group_next);
- mutex_unlock(&device->group->device_lock);
-}
-
-static int vfio_device_set_group(struct vfio_device *device,
- enum vfio_group_type type)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group;
-
- if (type == VFIO_IOMMU)
- group = vfio_group_find_or_alloc(device->dev);
- else
- group = vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(device->dev, type);
-
- if (IS_ERR(group))
- return PTR_ERR(group);
-
- /* Our reference on group is moved to the device */
- device->group = group;
- return 0;
-}
-
static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
enum vfio_group_type type)
{
@@ -575,35 +283,6 @@ int vfio_register_emulated_iommu_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_register_emulated_iommu_dev);
-static struct vfio_device *vfio_device_get_from_name(struct vfio_group *group,
- char *buf)
-{
- struct vfio_device *it, *device = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
-
- mutex_lock(&group->device_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(it, &group->device_list, group_next) {
- int ret;
-
- if (it->ops->match) {
- ret = it->ops->match(it, buf);
- if (ret < 0) {
- device = ERR_PTR(ret);
- break;
- }
- } else {
- ret = !strcmp(dev_name(it->dev), buf);
- }
-
- if (ret && vfio_device_try_get_registration(it)) {
- device = it;
- break;
- }
- }
- mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
-
- return device;
-}
-
/*
* Decrement the device reference count and wait for the device to be
* removed. Open file descriptors for the device... */
@@ -646,146 +325,12 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_unregister_group_dev);
-/*
- * VFIO Group fd, /dev/vfio/$GROUP
- */
-static bool vfio_group_has_iommu(struct vfio_group *group)
-{
- lockdep_assert_held(&group->group_lock);
- /*
- * There can only be users if there is a container, and if there is a
- * container there must be users.
- */
- WARN_ON(!group->container != !group->container_users);
-
- return group->container || group->iommufd;
-}
-
-/*
- * VFIO_GROUP_UNSET_CONTAINER should fail if there are other users or
- * if there was no container to unset. Since the ioctl is called on
- * the group, we know that still exists, therefore the only valid
- * transition here is 1->0.
- */
-static int vfio_group_ioctl_unset_container(struct vfio_group *group)
-{
- int ret = 0;
-
- mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
- if (!vfio_group_has_iommu(group)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
- if (group->container) {
- if (group->container_users != 1) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
- vfio_group_detach_container(group);
- }
- if (group->iommufd) {
- iommufd_ctx_put(group->iommufd);
- group->iommufd = NULL;
- }
-
-out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
- return ret;
-}
-
-static int vfio_group_ioctl_set_container(struct vfio_group *group,
- int __user *arg)
-{
- struct vfio_container *container;
- struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd;
- struct fd f;
- int ret;
- int fd;
-
- if (get_user(fd, arg))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- f = fdget(fd);
- if (!f.file)
- return -EBADF;
-
- mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
- if (vfio_group_has_iommu(group)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
- if (!group->iommu_group) {
- ret = -ENODEV;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
-
- container = vfio_container_from_file(f.file);
- if (container) {
- ret = vfio_container_attach_group(container, group);
- goto out_unlock;
- }
-
- iommufd = iommufd_ctx_from_file(f.file);
- if (!IS_ERR(iommufd)) {
- u32 ioas_id;
-
- ret = iommufd_vfio_compat_ioas_id(iommufd, &ioas_id);
- if (ret) {
- iommufd_ctx_put(group->iommufd);
- goto out_unlock;
- }
-
- group->iommufd = iommufd;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
-
- /* The FD passed is not recognized. */
- ret = -EBADFD;
-
-out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
- fdput(f);
- return ret;
-}
-
-static const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops;
-
/* true if the vfio_device has open_device() called but not close_device() */
static bool vfio_assert_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
{
return !WARN_ON_ONCE(!READ_ONCE(device->open_count));
}
-static int vfio_device_group_use_iommu(struct vfio_device *device)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
- int ret = 0;
-
- lockdep_assert_held(&group->group_lock);
-
- if (WARN_ON(!group->container))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- ret = vfio_group_use_container(group);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- vfio_device_container_register(device);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void vfio_device_group_unuse_iommu(struct vfio_device *device)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group = device->group;
-
- lockdep_assert_held(&group->group_lock);
-
- if (WARN_ON(!group->container))
- return;
-
- vfio_device_container_unregister(device);
- vfio_group_unuse_container(group);
-}
-
static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd, struct kvm *kvm)
{
@@ -837,8 +382,8 @@ static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device,
module_put(device->dev->driver->owner);
}
-static int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device,
- struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd, struct kvm *kvm)
+int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device,
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd, struct kvm *kvm)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -854,8 +399,8 @@ static int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device,
return ret;
}
-static void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
- struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
+void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
+ struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
{
mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
vfio_assert_device_open(device);
@@ -865,245 +410,6 @@ static void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
}
-static int vfio_device_group_open(struct vfio_device *device)
-{
- int ret;
-
- mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
- if (!vfio_group_has_iommu(device->group)) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
-
- /*
- * Here we pass the KVM pointer with the group under the lock. If the
- * device driver will use it, it must obtain a reference and release it
- * during close_device.
- */
- ret = vfio_device_open(device, device->group->iommufd,
- device->group->kvm);
-
-out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
- return ret;
-}
-
-static void vfio_device_group_close(struct vfio_device *device)
-{
- mutex_lock(&device->group->group_lock);
- vfio_device_close(device, device->group->iommufd);
- mutex_unlock(&device->group->group_lock);
-}
-
-static struct file *vfio_device_open_file(struct vfio_device *device)
-{
- struct file *filep;
- int ret;
-
- ret = vfio_device_group_open(device);
- if (ret)
- goto err_out;
-
- /*
- * We can't use anon_inode_getfd() because we need to modify
- * the f_mode flags directly to allow more than just ioctls
- */
- filep = anon_inode_getfile("[vfio-device]", &vfio_device_fops,
- device, O_RDWR);
- if (IS_ERR(filep)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(filep);
- goto err_close_device;
- }
-
- /*
- * TODO: add an anon_inode interface to do this.
- * Appears to be missing by lack of need rather than
- * explicitly prevented. Now there's need.
- */
- filep->f_mode |= (FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE);
-
- if (device->group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU)
- dev_warn(device->dev, "vfio-noiommu device opened by user "
- "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
- /*
- * On success the ref of device is moved to the file and
- * put in vfio_device_fops_release()
- */
- return filep;
-
-err_close_device:
- vfio_device_group_close(device);
-err_out:
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
-}
-
-static int vfio_group_ioctl_get_device_fd(struct vfio_group *group,
- char __user *arg)
-{
- struct vfio_device *device;
- struct file *filep;
- char *buf;
- int fdno;
- int ret;
-
- buf = strndup_user(arg, PAGE_SIZE);
- if (IS_ERR(buf))
- return PTR_ERR(buf);
-
- device = vfio_device_get_from_name(group, buf);
- kfree(buf);
- if (IS_ERR(device))
- return PTR_ERR(device);
-
- fdno = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC);
- if (fdno < 0) {
- ret = fdno;
- goto err_put_device;
- }
-
- filep = vfio_device_open_file(device);
- if (IS_ERR(filep)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(filep);
- goto err_put_fdno;
- }
-
- fd_install(fdno, filep);
- return fdno;
-
-err_put_fdno:
- put_unused_fd(fdno);
-err_put_device:
- vfio_device_put_registration(device);
- return ret;
-}
-
-static int vfio_group_ioctl_get_status(struct vfio_group *group,
- struct vfio_group_status __user *arg)
-{
- unsigned long minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_group_status, flags);
- struct vfio_group_status status;
-
- if (copy_from_user(&status, arg, minsz))
- return -EFAULT;
-
- if (status.argsz < minsz)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- status.flags = 0;
-
- mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
- if (!group->iommu_group) {
- mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- /*
- * With the container FD the iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() is done
- * during SET_CONTAINER but for IOMMFD this is done during
- * VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD. Meaning that with iommufd
- * VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_VIABLE could be set but GET_DEVICE_FD will fail due
- * to viability.
- */
- if (vfio_group_has_iommu(group))
- status.flags |= VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_CONTAINER_SET |
- VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_VIABLE;
- else if (!iommu_group_dma_owner_claimed(group->iommu_group))
- status.flags |= VFIO_GROUP_FLAGS_VIABLE;
- mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
-
- if (copy_to_user(arg, &status, minsz))
- return -EFAULT;
- return 0;
-}
-
-static long vfio_group_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
- unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group = filep->private_data;
- void __user *uarg = (void __user *)arg;
-
- switch (cmd) {
- case VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD:
- return vfio_group_ioctl_get_device_fd(group, uarg);
- case VFIO_GROUP_GET_STATUS:
- return vfio_group_ioctl_get_status(group, uarg);
- case VFIO_GROUP_SET_CONTAINER:
- return vfio_group_ioctl_set_container(group, uarg);
- case VFIO_GROUP_UNSET_CONTAINER:
- return vfio_group_ioctl_unset_container(group);
- default:
- return -ENOTTY;
- }
-}
-
-static int vfio_group_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group =
- container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct vfio_group, cdev);
- int ret;
-
- mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
-
- /*
- * drivers can be zero if this races with vfio_device_remove_group(), it
- * will be stable at 0 under the group rwsem
- */
- if (refcount_read(&group->drivers) == 0) {
- ret = -ENODEV;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
-
- if (group->type == VFIO_NO_IOMMU && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) {
- ret = -EPERM;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
-
- /*
- * Do we need multiple instances of the group open? Seems not.
- */
- if (group->opened_file) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto out_unlock;
- }
- group->opened_file = filep;
- filep->private_data = group;
- ret = 0;
-out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
- return ret;
-}
-
-static int vfio_group_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group = filep->private_data;
-
- filep->private_data = NULL;
-
- mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
- /*
- * Device FDs hold a group file reference, therefore the group release
- * is only called when there are no open devices.
- */
- WARN_ON(group->notifier.head);
- if (group->container)
- vfio_group_detach_container(group);
- if (group->iommufd) {
- iommufd_ctx_put(group->iommufd);
- group->iommufd = NULL;
- }
- group->opened_file = NULL;
- mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static const struct file_operations vfio_group_fops = {
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .unlocked_ioctl = vfio_group_fops_unl_ioctl,
- .compat_ioctl = compat_ptr_ioctl,
- .open = vfio_group_fops_open,
- .release = vfio_group_fops_release,
-};
-
/*
* Wrapper around pm_runtime_resume_and_get().
* Return error code on failure or 0 on success.
@@ -1699,7 +1005,7 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_mmap(struct file *filep, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
return device->ops->mmap(device, vma);
}
-static const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops = {
+const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.release = vfio_device_fops_release,
.read = vfio_device_fops_read,
@@ -1709,121 +1015,6 @@ static const struct file_operations vfio_device_fops = {
.mmap = vfio_device_fops_mmap,
};
-/**
- * vfio_file_iommu_group - Return the struct iommu_group for the vfio group file
- * @file: VFIO group file
- *
- * The returned iommu_group is valid as long as a ref is held on the file. This
- * returns a reference on the group. This function is deprecated, only the SPAPR
- * path in kvm should call it.
- */
-struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
- struct iommu_group *iommu_group = NULL;
-
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU))
- return NULL;
-
- if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
- return NULL;
-
- mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
- if (group->iommu_group) {
- iommu_group = group->iommu_group;
- iommu_group_ref_get(iommu_group);
- }
- mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
- return iommu_group;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_iommu_group);
-
-/**
- * vfio_file_is_group - True if the file is usable with VFIO aPIS
- * @file: VFIO group file
- */
-bool vfio_file_is_group(struct file *file)
-{
- return file->f_op == &vfio_group_fops;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_is_group);
-
-/**
- * vfio_file_enforced_coherent - True if the DMA associated with the VFIO file
- * is always CPU cache coherent
- * @file: VFIO group file
- *
- * Enforced coherency means that the IOMMU ignores things like the PCIe no-snoop
- * bit in DMA transactions. A return of false indicates that the user has
- * rights to access additional instructions such as wbinvd on x86.
- */
-bool vfio_file_enforced_coherent(struct file *file)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
- struct vfio_device *device;
- bool ret = true;
-
- if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
- return true;
-
- /*
- * If the device does not have IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY then
- * any domain later attached to it will also not support it. If the cap
- * is set then the iommu_domain eventually attached to the device/group
- * must use a domain with enforce_cache_coherency().
- */
- mutex_lock(&group->device_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(device, &group->device_list, group_next) {
- if (!device_iommu_capable(device->dev,
- IOMMU_CAP_ENFORCE_CACHE_COHERENCY)) {
- ret = false;
- break;
- }
- }
- mutex_unlock(&group->device_lock);
- return ret;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_enforced_coherent);
-
-/**
- * vfio_file_set_kvm - Link a kvm with VFIO drivers
- * @file: VFIO group file
- * @kvm: KVM to link
- *
- * When a VFIO device is first opened the KVM will be available in
- * device->kvm if one was associated with the group.
- */
-void vfio_file_set_kvm(struct file *file, struct kvm *kvm)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
-
- if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
- return;
-
- mutex_lock(&group->group_lock);
- group->kvm = kvm;
- mutex_unlock(&group->group_lock);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_set_kvm);
-
-/**
- * vfio_file_has_dev - True if the VFIO file is a handle for device
- * @file: VFIO file to check
- * @device: Device that must be part of the file
- *
- * Returns true if given file has permission to manipulate the given device.
- */
-bool vfio_file_has_dev(struct file *file, struct vfio_device *device)
-{
- struct vfio_group *group = file->private_data;
-
- if (!vfio_file_is_group(file))
- return false;
-
- return group == device->group;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_file_has_dev);
-
/*
* Sub-module support
*/
@@ -1943,11 +1134,6 @@ int vfio_set_irqs_validate_and_prepare(struct vfio_irq_set *hdr, int num_irqs,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfio_set_irqs_validate_and_prepare);
-static bool vfio_device_has_container(struct vfio_device *device)
-{
- return device->group->container;
-}
-
/*
* Pin contiguous user pages and return their associated host pages for local
* domain only.
@@ -2069,55 +1255,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfio_dma_rw);
/*
* Module/class support
*/
-static char *vfio_devnode(struct device *dev, umode_t *mode)
-{
- return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "vfio/%s", dev_name(dev));
-}
-
-static int __init vfio_group_init(void)
-{
- int ret;
-
- ida_init(&vfio.group_ida);
- mutex_init(&vfio.group_lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vfio.group_list);
-
- ret = vfio_container_init();
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- /* /dev/vfio/$GROUP */
- vfio.class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "vfio");
- if (IS_ERR(vfio.class)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(vfio.class);
- goto err_group_class;
- }
-
- vfio.class->devnode = vfio_devnode;
-
- ret = alloc_chrdev_region(&vfio.group_devt, 0, MINORMASK + 1, "vfio");
- if (ret)
- goto err_alloc_chrdev;
- return 0;
-
-err_alloc_chrdev:
- class_destroy(vfio.class);
- vfio.class = NULL;
-err_group_class:
- vfio_container_cleanup();
- return ret;
-}
-
-static void vfio_group_cleanup(void)
-{
- WARN_ON(!list_empty(&vfio.group_list));
- ida_destroy(&vfio.group_ida);
- unregister_chrdev_region(vfio.group_devt, MINORMASK + 1);
- class_destroy(vfio.class);
- vfio.class = NULL;
- vfio_container_cleanup();
-}
-
static int __init vfio_init(void)
{
int ret;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 10/10] vfio: Move vfio group specific code into group.c
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 10/10] vfio: Move vfio group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-02 6:26 ` Tian, Kevin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Tian, Kevin @ 2022-12-02 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liu, Yi L, alex.williamson@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com
> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 10:56 PM
>
> This prepares for compiling out vfio group after vfio device cdev is
> added. No vfio_group decode code should be in vfio_main.c, and neither
> device->group reference should be in vfio_main.c.
>
> No functional change is intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c
2022-12-01 14:55 [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2022-12-01 14:55 ` [PATCH 10/10] vfio: Move vfio group specific code into group.c Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-01 20:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-02 13:57 ` Yi Liu
10 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2022-12-01 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yi Liu, alex.williamson
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.y.sun
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:55:25AM -0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> With the introduction of iommufd[1], VFIO is towarding to provide device
> centric uAPI after adapting to iommufd. With this trend, existing VFIO
> group infrastructure is optional once VFIO converted to device centric.
>
> This series moves the group specific code out of vfio_main.c, prepares
> for compiling group infrastructure out after adding vfio device cdev[2]
>
> Complete code in below branch:
>
> https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/commits/vfio_group_split_v1
>
> This is based on Jason's "Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD"[3] and my "Make mdev driver
> dma_unmap callback tolerant to unmaps come before device open"[4]
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0-v5-4001c2997bd0+30c-iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com/
> [2] https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/tree/wip/vfio_device_cdev
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/0-v4-42cd2eb0e3eb+335a-vfio_iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com/
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20221129105831.466954-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
This looks good to me, and it applies OK to my branch here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgg/iommufd.git/
Alex, if you ack this in the next few days I can include it in the
iommufd PR, otherwise it can go into the vfio tree in January
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c
2022-12-01 20:39 ` [PATCH 00/10] Move " Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2022-12-02 13:57 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-02 14:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-02 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Gunthorpe, alex.williamson
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng, yi.y.sun
On 2022/12/2 04:39, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:55:25AM -0800, Yi Liu wrote:
>> With the introduction of iommufd[1], VFIO is towarding to provide device
>> centric uAPI after adapting to iommufd. With this trend, existing VFIO
>> group infrastructure is optional once VFIO converted to device centric.
>>
>> This series moves the group specific code out of vfio_main.c, prepares
>> for compiling group infrastructure out after adding vfio device cdev[2]
>>
>> Complete code in below branch:
>>
>> https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/commits/vfio_group_split_v1
>>
>> This is based on Jason's "Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD"[3] and my "Make mdev driver
>> dma_unmap callback tolerant to unmaps come before device open"[4]
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0-v5-4001c2997bd0+30c-iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com/
>> [2] https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/tree/wip/vfio_device_cdev
>> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/0-v4-42cd2eb0e3eb+335a-vfio_iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com/
>> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20221129105831.466954-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>
> This looks good to me, and it applies OK to my branch here:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgg/iommufd.git/
>
> Alex, if you ack this in the next few days I can include it in the
> iommufd PR, otherwise it can go into the vfio tree in January
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>
thanks. btw. I've updated my github to incorporate Kevin's nit and also
r-b from you and Kevin.
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c
2022-12-02 13:57 ` Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-02 14:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-02 23:12 ` Alex Williamson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2022-12-02 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yi Liu
Cc: alex.williamson, kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm,
mjrosato, chao.p.peng, yi.y.sun
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 09:57:45PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> On 2022/12/2 04:39, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:55:25AM -0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> > > With the introduction of iommufd[1], VFIO is towarding to provide device
> > > centric uAPI after adapting to iommufd. With this trend, existing VFIO
> > > group infrastructure is optional once VFIO converted to device centric.
> > >
> > > This series moves the group specific code out of vfio_main.c, prepares
> > > for compiling group infrastructure out after adding vfio device cdev[2]
> > >
> > > Complete code in below branch:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/commits/vfio_group_split_v1
> > >
> > > This is based on Jason's "Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD"[3] and my "Make mdev driver
> > > dma_unmap callback tolerant to unmaps come before device open"[4]
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0-v5-4001c2997bd0+30c-iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com/
> > > [2] https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/tree/wip/vfio_device_cdev
> > > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/0-v4-42cd2eb0e3eb+335a-vfio_iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com/
> > > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20221129105831.466954-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> >
> > This looks good to me, and it applies OK to my branch here:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgg/iommufd.git/
> >
> > Alex, if you ack this in the next few days I can include it in the
> > iommufd PR, otherwise it can go into the vfio tree in January
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> >
>
> thanks. btw. I've updated my github to incorporate Kevin's nit and also
> r-b from you and Kevin.
Please rebase it on the above branch also
Thanks,
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c
2022-12-02 14:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2022-12-02 23:12 ` Alex Williamson
2022-12-03 13:53 ` Yi Liu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2022-12-02 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Gunthorpe, yi.y.sun
Cc: Yi Liu, kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 10:44:30 -0400
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 09:57:45PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> > On 2022/12/2 04:39, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:55:25AM -0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> > > > With the introduction of iommufd[1], VFIO is towarding to provide device
> > > > centric uAPI after adapting to iommufd. With this trend, existing VFIO
> > > > group infrastructure is optional once VFIO converted to device centric.
> > > >
> > > > This series moves the group specific code out of vfio_main.c, prepares
> > > > for compiling group infrastructure out after adding vfio device cdev[2]
> > > >
> > > > Complete code in below branch:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/commits/vfio_group_split_v1
> > > >
> > > > This is based on Jason's "Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD"[3] and my "Make mdev driver
> > > > dma_unmap callback tolerant to unmaps come before device open"[4]
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0-v5-4001c2997bd0+30c-iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com/
> > > > [2] https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/tree/wip/vfio_device_cdev
> > > > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/0-v4-42cd2eb0e3eb+335a-vfio_iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com/
> > > > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20221129105831.466954-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> > >
> > > This looks good to me, and it applies OK to my branch here:
> > >
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgg/iommufd.git/
> > >
> > > Alex, if you ack this in the next few days I can include it in the
> > > iommufd PR, otherwise it can go into the vfio tree in January
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > >
> >
> > thanks. btw. I've updated my github to incorporate Kevin's nit and also
> > r-b from you and Kevin.
>
> Please rebase it on the above branch also
It looks fine to me aside from the previous review comments and my own
spelling nit. I also don't see that this adds any additional conflicts
vs the existing iommufd integration for any outstanding vfio patches on
the list, therefore, where there's not already a sign-off from me:
Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c
2022-12-02 23:12 ` Alex Williamson
@ 2022-12-03 13:53 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-05 13:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-06 7:31 ` Yang, Lixiao
0 siblings, 2 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yi Liu @ 2022-12-03 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Williamson, Jason Gunthorpe, yi.y.sun
Cc: kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger, nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato,
chao.p.peng
On 2022/12/3 07:12, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 10:44:30 -0400
> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 09:57:45PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
>>> On 2022/12/2 04:39, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:55:25AM -0800, Yi Liu wrote:
>>>>> With the introduction of iommufd[1], VFIO is towarding to provide device
>>>>> centric uAPI after adapting to iommufd. With this trend, existing VFIO
>>>>> group infrastructure is optional once VFIO converted to device centric.
>>>>>
>>>>> This series moves the group specific code out of vfio_main.c, prepares
>>>>> for compiling group infrastructure out after adding vfio device cdev[2]
>>>>>
>>>>> Complete code in below branch:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/commits/vfio_group_split_v1
>>>>>
>>>>> This is based on Jason's "Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD"[3] and my "Make mdev driver
>>>>> dma_unmap callback tolerant to unmaps come before device open"[4]
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0-v5-4001c2997bd0+30c-iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com/
>>>>> [2] https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/tree/wip/vfio_device_cdev
>>>>> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/0-v4-42cd2eb0e3eb+335a-vfio_iommufd_jgg@nvidia.com/
>>>>> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20221129105831.466954-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com/
>>>>
>>>> This looks good to me, and it applies OK to my branch here:
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgg/iommufd.git/
>>>>
>>>> Alex, if you ack this in the next few days I can include it in the
>>>> iommufd PR, otherwise it can go into the vfio tree in January
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> thanks. btw. I've updated my github to incorporate Kevin's nit and also
>>> r-b from you and Kevin.
>>
>> Please rebase it on the above branch also
To Jason: done. Please fetch from below branch.
https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/commits/for-jason/vfio_group_split
> It looks fine to me aside from the previous review comments and my own
> spelling nit. I also don't see that this adds any additional conflicts
> vs the existing iommufd integration for any outstanding vfio patches on
> the list, therefore, where there's not already a sign-off from me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To Alex: thanks. above branch is based on Jason's for-next. So may have
one minor conflict with below commit in your next branch.
vfio: Remove vfio_free_device
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c
2022-12-03 13:53 ` Yi Liu
@ 2022-12-05 13:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-12-06 7:31 ` Yang, Lixiao
1 sibling, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2022-12-05 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yi Liu
Cc: Alex Williamson, yi.y.sun, kevin.tian, cohuck, eric.auger,
nicolinc, kvm, mjrosato, chao.p.peng
On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 09:53:18PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> > > Please rebase it on the above branch also
>
> To Jason: done. Please fetch from below branch.
>
> https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/commits/for-jason/vfio_group_split
Okay, it is merged in to the iommufd tree
> > It looks fine to me aside from the previous review comments and my own
> > spelling nit. I also don't see that this adds any additional conflicts
> > vs the existing iommufd integration for any outstanding vfio patches on
> > the list, therefore, where there's not already a sign-off from me:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>
> To Alex: thanks. above branch is based on Jason's for-next. So may have
> one minor conflict with below commit in your next branch.
>
> vfio: Remove vfio_free_device
It seems OK, I did a test merge
Thanks,
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c
2022-12-03 13:53 ` Yi Liu
2022-12-05 13:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2022-12-06 7:31 ` Yang, Lixiao
2022-12-07 4:12 ` He, Yu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 28+ messages in thread
From: Yang, Lixiao @ 2022-12-06 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liu, Yi L, Alex Williamson, Jason Gunthorpe,
yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com
Cc: Tian, Kevin, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, He, Yu
On 2022/12/3 21:53, Yi Liu wrote:
> On 2022/12/3 07:12, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 10:44:30 -0400
>> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 09:57:45PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
>>>> On 2022/12/2 04:39, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:55:25AM -0800, Yi Liu wrote:
>>>>>> With the introduction of iommufd[1], VFIO is towarding to provide
>>>>>> device centric uAPI after adapting to iommufd. With this trend,
>>>>>> existing VFIO group infrastructure is optional once VFIO converted to device centric.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This series moves the group specific code out of vfio_main.c,
>>>>>> prepares for compiling group infrastructure out after adding vfio
>>>>>> device cdev[2]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Complete code in below branch:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/commits/vfio_group_split_v1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is based on Jason's "Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD"[3] and my
>>>>>> "Make mdev driver dma_unmap callback tolerant to unmaps come
>>>>>> before device open"[4]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/0-v5-4001c2997bd0+30c-iommufd_jgg@nvi
>>>>>> dia.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>> https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/tree/wip/vfio_device_cdev
>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/0-v4-42cd2eb0e3eb+335a-vfio_iommufd_j
>>>>>> gg@nvidia.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20221129105831.466954-1-yi.l.liu@inte
>>>>>> l.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> This looks good to me, and it applies OK to my branch here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgg/iommufd.git/
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex, if you ack this in the next few days I can include it in the
>>>>> iommufd PR, otherwise it can go into the vfio tree in January
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>>>>
>>>> thanks. btw. I've updated my github to incorporate Kevin's nit and
>>>> also r-b from you and Kevin.
>>>
>>> Please rebase it on the above branch also
>
> To Jason: done. Please fetch from below branch.
>
> https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/commits/for-jason/vfio_group_spli
> t
Tested NIC passthrough on Intel platform with above branch (Commit id: bf445e6747b588a774f5e45f2c9e0cdaa3140d7c).
Result looks good hence,
Tested-by: Lixiao Yang <lixiao.yang@intel.com>
>> It looks fine to me aside from the previous review comments and my
>> own spelling nit. I also don't see that this adds any additional
>> conflicts vs the existing iommufd integration for any outstanding
>> vfio patches on the list, therefore, where there's not already a sign-off from me:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>
> To Alex: thanks. above branch is based on Jason's for-next. So may
> have one minor conflict with below commit in your next branch.
>
> vfio: Remove vfio_free_device
Best regards,
Lixiao Yang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 00/10] Move group specific code into group.c
2022-12-06 7:31 ` Yang, Lixiao
@ 2022-12-07 4:12 ` He, Yu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 28+ messages in thread
From: He, Yu @ 2022-12-07 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yang, Lixiao, Liu, Yi L, Alex Williamson, Jason Gunthorpe,
yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com
Cc: Tian, Kevin, cohuck@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
nicolinc@nvidia.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com,
chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com
On 2022/12/6 15:31, Yang, Lixiao wrote:
> On 2022/12/3 21:53, Yi Liu wrote:
>> On 2022/12/3 07:12, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 10:44:30 -0400
>>> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 09:57:45PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
>>>>> On 2022/12/2 04:39, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:55:25AM -0800, Yi Liu wrote:
>>>>>>> With the introduction of iommufd[1], VFIO is towarding to provide
>>>>>>> device centric uAPI after adapting to iommufd. With this trend,
>>>>>>> existing VFIO group infrastructure is optional once VFIO converted to device centric.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This series moves the group specific code out of vfio_main.c,
>>>>>>> prepares for compiling group infrastructure out after adding vfio
>>>>>>> device cdev[2]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Complete code in below branch:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/commits/vfio_group_split_v1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is based on Jason's "Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD"[3] and my
>>>>>>> "Make mdev driver dma_unmap callback tolerant to unmaps come
>>>>>>> before device open"[4]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/0-v5-4001c2997bd0+30c-iommufd_jgg@nvi
>>>>>>> dia.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>> https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/tree/wip/vfio_device_cdev
>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/0-v4-42cd2eb0e3eb+335a-vfio_iommufd_j
>>>>>>> gg@nvidia.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20221129105831.466954-1-yi.l.liu@inte
>>>>>>> l.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This looks good to me, and it applies OK to my branch here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgg/iommufd.git/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alex, if you ack this in the next few days I can include it in the
>>>>>> iommufd PR, otherwise it can go into the vfio tree in January
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks. btw. I've updated my github to incorporate Kevin's nit and
>>>>> also r-b from you and Kevin.
>>>>
>>>> Please rebase it on the above branch also
>>
>> To Jason: done. Please fetch from below branch.
>>
>> https://github.com/yiliu1765/iommufd/commits/for-jason/vfio_group_spli
>> t
>
> Tested NIC passthrough on Intel platform with above branch (Commit id: bf445e6747b588a774f5e45f2c9e0cdaa3140d7c).
> Result looks good hence,
> Tested-by: Lixiao Yang <lixiao.yang@intel.com>
>
>
>>> It looks fine to me aside from the previous review comments and my>>> own spelling nit. I also don't see that this adds any additional
>>> conflicts vs the existing iommufd integration for any outstanding
>>> vfio patches on the list, therefore, where there's not already a sign-off from me:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>>
>> To Alex: thanks. above branch is based on Jason's for-next. So may
>> have one minor conflict with below commit in your next branch.
>>
>> vfio: Remove vfio_free_device
>
> Best regards,
> Lixiao Yang
GVT-g test passed with hybrid mode, GVT-d test passed with compat mode.
Tested-by: Yu He <yu.he@intel.com>
--
Best regards,
He,Yu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 28+ messages in thread