Re: [PATCH v3 20/20] iommu: Rename attach_dev to set_dev

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>]

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 01:41:56PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2022-11-28 06:46, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > With the retirement of the detach_dev callback, the naming of attach_dev
> > isn't meaningful anymore. Rename it to set_dev to restore its real
> > meaning, that is, setting an iommu domain to a device.
> 
> English grammar alert: this part is confusing, since the usual in-context
> reading* of "set[ting] X to Y" is going to imply assigning a value of Y to
> some unique property of X. Given the actual semantic that when we attach the
> device to the domain, we are setting the (current) domain as a property of
> the device, I think the most logical and intuitive abbreviation for this
> method would be set_domain(), where the target device is then clearly
> implied by the argument (as the target domain was for attach_dev()).

This is the iommu_domain_ops, it seems a bit weird to call it
set_domain when it is already acting on a domain object.

set_device_domain()

?

> FWIW I also wouldn't say that "attach" loses its meaning in a context where
> an equivalent "detach" operation is only ever implicit in reattaching to
> something else, however I do agree that it *is* worth switching the
> terminology to clearly differentiate this internal behaviour from the public
> attach/detach API for unmanaged domains.

+1

Jason