All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Sriram Yagnaraman <sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	claudio.porfiri@ericsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] netfilter: conntrack: add sctp DATA_SENT state
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:27:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4eShs1cQ7V0mk9n@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221104171835.1224-1-sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech>

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 06:18:35PM +0100, Sriram Yagnaraman wrote:
> Changes since v2:
> - Abandoned the sctp no_random_port patch from the series
> 
> SCTP conntrack currently assumes that the SCTP endpoints will
> probe secondary paths using HEARTBEAT before sending traffic.
> 
> But, according to RFC 9260, SCTP endpoints can send any traffic
> on any of the confirmed paths after SCTP association is up.
> SCTP endpoints that sends INIT will confirm all peer addresses
> that upper layer configures, and the SCTP endpoint that receives
> COOKIE_ECHO will only confirm the address it sent the INIT_ACK to.
> 
> So, we can have a situation where the INIT sender can start to
> use secondary paths without the need to send HEARTBEAT. This patch
> allows DATA/SACK packets to create new connection tracking entry.
> 
> A new state has been added to indicate that a DATA/SACK chunk has
> been seen in the original direction - SCTP_CONNTRACK_DATA_SENT.
> State transitions mostly follows the HEARTBEAT_SENT, except on
> receiving HEARTBEAT/HEARTBEAT_ACK/DATA/SACK in the reply direction.
> 
> State transitions in original direction:
> - DATA_SENT behaves similar to HEARTBEAT_SENT for all chunks,
>    except that it remains in DATA_SENT on receving HEARTBEAT,
>    HEARTBEAT_ACK/DATA/SACK chunks
> State transitions in reply direction:
> - DATA_SENT behaves similar to HEARTBEAT_SENT for all chunks,
>    except that it moves to HEARTBEAT_ACKED on receiving
>    HEARTBEAT/HEARTBEAT_ACK/DATA/SACK chunks
> 
> Note: This patch still doesn't solve the problem when the SCTP
> endpoint decides to use primary paths for association establishment
> but uses a secondary path for association shutdown. We still have
> to depend on timeout for connections to expire in such a case.

Applied, thanks

One request of mine: Would you send a patch to extend

        Documentation/networking/nf_conntrack-sysctl.rst

to document sctp timeouts?

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-30 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-04 17:18 [PATCH v3] netfilter: conntrack: add sctp DATA_SENT state Sriram Yagnaraman
2022-11-30 17:27 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2022-12-01  9:23   ` Sriram Yagnaraman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y4eShs1cQ7V0mk9n@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=claudio.porfiri@ericsson.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sriram.yagnaraman@est.tech \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.