From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: asix: Avoid looping when the device is diconnected
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 13:48:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4yI95L+LYhp5ESL@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221201175525.2733125-2-l.stach@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:55:25PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> We've seen device access fail with -EPROTO when the device has been
> recently disconnected and before the USB core had a chance to handle
> the disconnect hub event. It doesn't make sense to continue on trying
> to enable host access when the adapter is gone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c b/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c
> index be1e103b7a95..28b31e4da020 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static int asix_check_host_enable(struct usbnet *dev, int in_pm)
>
> for (i = 0; i < AX_HOST_EN_RETRIES; ++i) {
> ret = asix_set_sw_mii(dev, in_pm);
> - if (ret == -ENODEV || ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> + if (ret == -ENODEV || ret == -ETIMEDOUT || ret == -EPROTO)
It looks like you can put if (ret < 0) here,
> break;
> usleep_range(1000, 1100);
> ret = asix_read_cmd(dev, AX_CMD_STATMNGSTS_REG,
> --
> 2.30.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-04 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 17:55 [PATCH 1/2] net: asix: Simplify return value check after asix_check_host_enable Lucas Stach
2022-12-01 17:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] net: asix: Avoid looping when the device is diconnected Lucas Stach
2022-12-04 11:48 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-12-06 1:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-04 11:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: asix: Simplify return value check after asix_check_host_enable Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y4yI95L+LYhp5ESL@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.