From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@engleder-embedded.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<hawk@kernel.org>, <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] tsnep: Add XDP TX support
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 15:10:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5HwRZmCv2WYpBtg@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221208054045.3600-3-gerhard@engleder-embedded.com>
On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 06:40:41AM +0100, Gerhard Engleder wrote:
> Implement ndo_xdp_xmit() for XDP TX support. Support for fragmented XDP
> frames is included.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@engleder-embedded.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h | 12 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h
> index f72c0c4da1a9..29b04127f529 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ struct tsnep_rxnfc_rule {
> int location;
> };
>
> +enum tsnep_tx_type {
> + TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB,
> + TSNEP_TX_TYPE_XDP_TX,
> + TSNEP_TX_TYPE_XDP_NDO,
> +};
> +
> struct tsnep_tx_entry {
> struct tsnep_tx_desc *desc;
> struct tsnep_tx_desc_wb *desc_wb;
> @@ -65,7 +71,11 @@ struct tsnep_tx_entry {
>
> u32 properties;
>
> - struct sk_buff *skb;
> + enum tsnep_tx_type type;
> + union {
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + struct xdp_frame *xdpf;
> + };
> size_t len;
> DEFINE_DMA_UNMAP_ADDR(dma);
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c
> index a28fde9fb060..b97cfd5fa1fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/engleder/tsnep_main.c
> @@ -310,10 +310,11 @@ static void tsnep_tx_activate(struct tsnep_tx *tx, int index, int length,
> struct tsnep_tx_entry *entry = &tx->entry[index];
>
> entry->properties = 0;
> - if (entry->skb) {
> + if (entry->skb || entry->xdpf) {
i think this change is redundant, you could keep a single check as skb and
xdpf ptrs share the same memory, but i guess this makes it more obvious
> entry->properties = length & TSNEP_DESC_LENGTH_MASK;
> entry->properties |= TSNEP_DESC_INTERRUPT_FLAG;
> - if (skb_shinfo(entry->skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS)
> + if (entry->type == TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB &&
> + skb_shinfo(entry->skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS)
> entry->properties |= TSNEP_DESC_EXTENDED_WRITEBACK_FLAG;
>
> /* toggle user flag to prevent false acknowledge
> @@ -400,6 +401,8 @@ static int tsnep_tx_map(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tsnep_tx *tx, int count)
>
> entry->desc->tx = __cpu_to_le64(dma);
>
> + entry->type = TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB;
> +
> map_len += len;
> }
>
> @@ -417,12 +420,13 @@ static int tsnep_tx_unmap(struct tsnep_tx *tx, int index, int count)
> entry = &tx->entry[(index + i) % TSNEP_RING_SIZE];
>
> if (entry->len) {
> - if (i == 0)
> + if (i == 0 && entry->type == TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB)
> dma_unmap_single(dmadev,
> dma_unmap_addr(entry, dma),
> dma_unmap_len(entry, len),
> DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> - else
> + else if (entry->type == TSNEP_TX_TYPE_SKB ||
> + entry->type == TSNEP_TX_TYPE_XDP_NDO)
> dma_unmap_page(dmadev,
> dma_unmap_addr(entry, dma),
> dma_unmap_len(entry, len),
> @@ -505,6 +509,122 @@ static netdev_tx_t tsnep_xmit_frame_ring(struct sk_buff *skb,
> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> }
>
> +static int tsnep_xdp_tx_map(struct xdp_frame *xdpf, struct tsnep_tx *tx,
> + struct skb_shared_info *shinfo, int count,
> + bool dma_map)
> +{
> + struct device *dmadev = tx->adapter->dmadev;
> + skb_frag_t *frag;
> + unsigned int len;
> + struct tsnep_tx_entry *entry;
> + void *data;
> + struct page *page;
> + dma_addr_t dma;
> + int map_len = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + frag = NULL;
> + len = xdpf->len;
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> + entry = &tx->entry[(tx->write + i) % TSNEP_RING_SIZE];
> + if (dma_map) {
> + data = unlikely(frag) ? skb_frag_address(frag) :
> + xdpf->data;
> + dma = dma_map_single(dmadev, data, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + if (dma_mapping_error(dmadev, dma))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + entry->type = TSNEP_TX_TYPE_XDP_NDO;
> + } else {
> + page = unlikely(frag) ? skb_frag_page(frag) :
> + virt_to_page(xdpf->data);
> + dma = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page);
> + if (unlikely(frag))
> + dma += skb_frag_off(frag);
> + else
> + dma += sizeof(*xdpf) + xdpf->headroom;
> + dma_sync_single_for_device(dmadev, dma, len,
> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> +
> + entry->type = TSNEP_TX_TYPE_XDP_TX;
> + }
> +
> + entry->len = len;
> + dma_unmap_addr_set(entry, dma, dma);
> +
> + entry->desc->tx = __cpu_to_le64(dma);
> +
> + map_len += len;
> +
> + if ((i + 1) < count) {
> + frag = &shinfo->frags[i];
> + len = skb_frag_size(frag);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return map_len;
> +}
> +
> +/* This function requires __netif_tx_lock is held by the caller. */
> +static int tsnep_xdp_xmit_frame_ring(struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
> + struct tsnep_tx *tx, bool dma_map)
> +{
> + struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_frame(xdpf);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int count = 1;
> + struct tsnep_tx_entry *entry;
> + int length;
> + int i;
> + int retval;
> +
> + if (unlikely(xdp_frame_has_frags(xdpf)))
> + count += shinfo->nr_frags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&tx->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (tsnep_tx_desc_available(tx) < (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 + count)) {
Wouldn't count + 1 be sufficient to check against the descs available?
if there are frags then you have already accounted them under count
variable so i feel like MAX_SKB_FRAGS is redundant.
> + /* prevent full TX ring due to XDP */
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx->lock, flags);
> +
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + entry = &tx->entry[tx->write];
> + entry->xdpf = xdpf;
> +
> + retval = tsnep_xdp_tx_map(xdpf, tx, shinfo, count, dma_map);
> + if (retval < 0) {
> + tsnep_tx_unmap(tx, tx->write, count);
> + entry->xdpf = NULL;
> +
> + tx->dropped++;
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx->lock, flags);
> +
> + netdev_err(tx->adapter->netdev, "XDP TX DMA map failed\n");
> +
> + return retval;
> + }
> + length = retval;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> + tsnep_tx_activate(tx, (tx->write + i) % TSNEP_RING_SIZE, length,
> + i == (count - 1));
> + tx->write = (tx->write + count) % TSNEP_RING_SIZE;
> +
> + /* descriptor properties shall be valid before hardware is notified */
> + dma_wmb();
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx->lock, flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
(...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-08 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-08 5:40 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] tsnep: XDP support Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 5:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] tsnep: Add adapter down state Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 5:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] tsnep: Add XDP TX support Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 14:10 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2022-12-08 19:57 ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-09 2:23 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-12-09 8:02 ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 5:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] tsnep: Support XDP BPF program setup Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-09 0:43 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-12-09 8:06 ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-21 20:19 ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 5:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] tsnep: Prepare RX buffer for XDP support Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-09 0:46 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-12-08 5:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] tsnep: Add RX queue info " Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 12:59 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-12-08 20:32 ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-09 0:53 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-12-09 8:11 ` Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 5:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] tsnep: Add XDP RX support Gerhard Engleder
2022-12-08 13:40 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-12-08 22:12 ` Gerhard Engleder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5HwRZmCv2WYpBtg@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gerhard@engleder-embedded.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.