All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, hreitz@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	vsementsov@yandex-team.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] block: Introduce a block graph rwlock
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:14:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5dhjKx4EdeOxJmQ@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d49373f0-ba87-f976-726b-64ff15a5e371@redhat.com>

Am 07.12.2022 um 15:12 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben:
> Am 07/12/2022 um 14:18 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> > This series supersedes the first half of Emanuele's "Protect the block
> > layer with a rwlock: part 1". It introduces the basic infrastructure for
> > protecting the block graph (specifically parent/child links) with a
> > rwlock. Actually taking the reader lock in all necessary places is left
> > for future series.
> > 
> > Compared to Emanuele's series, this one adds patches to make use of
> > clang's Thread Safety Analysis (TSA) feature in order to statically
> > check at compile time that the places where we assert that we hold the
> > lock actually do hold it. Once we cover all relevant places, the check
> > can be extended to verify that all accesses of bs->children and
> > bs->parents hold the lock.
> > 
> > For reference, here is the more detailed version of our plan in
> > Emanuele's words from his series:
> > 
> >     The aim is to replace the current AioContext lock with much
> >     fine-grained locks, aimed to protect only specific data. Currently
> >     the AioContext lock is used pretty much everywhere, and it's not
> >     even clear what it is protecting exactly.
> > 
> >     The aim of the rwlock is to cover graph modifications: more
> >     precisely, when a BlockDriverState parent or child list is modified
> >     or read, since it can be concurrently accessed by the main loop and
> >     iothreads.
> > 
> >     The main assumption is that the main loop is the only one allowed to
> >     perform graph modifications, and so far this has always been held by
> >     the current code.
> > 
> >     The rwlock is inspired from cpus-common.c implementation, and aims
> >     to reduce cacheline bouncing by having per-aiocontext counter of
> >     readers.  All details and implementation of the lock are in patch 2.
> > 
> >     We distinguish between writer (main loop, under BQL) that modifies
> >     the graph, and readers (all other coroutines running in various
> >     AioContext), that go through the graph edges, reading ->parents
> >     and->children.  The writer (main loop)  has an "exclusive" access,
> >     so it first waits for current read to finish, and then prevents
> >     incoming ones from entering while it has the exclusive access.  The
> >     readers (coroutines in multiple AioContext) are free to access the
> >     graph as long the writer is not modifying the graph.  In case it is,
> >     they go in a CoQueue and sleep until the writer is done.
> > 
> > In this and following series, we try to follow the following locking
> > pattern:
> > 
> > - bdrv_co_* functions that call BlockDriver callbacks always expect
> >   the lock to be taken, therefore they assert.
> > 
> > - blk_co_* functions are called from external code outside the block
> >   layer, which should not have to care about the block layer's
> >   internal locking. Usually they also call blk_wait_while_drained().
> >   Therefore they take the lock internally.
> > 
> > The long term goal of this series is to eventually replace the
> > AioContext lock, so that we can get rid of it once and for all.
> > 
> > Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito (7):
> >   graph-lock: Implement guard macros
> >   async: Register/unregister aiocontext in graph lock list
> >   block: wrlock in bdrv_replace_child_noperm
> >   block: remove unnecessary assert_bdrv_graph_writable()
> >   block: assert that graph read and writes are performed correctly
> >   block-coroutine-wrapper.py: introduce annotations that take the graph
> >     rdlock
> >   block: use co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock in functions taking the rdlock
> > 
> > Kevin Wolf (10):
> >   block: Factor out bdrv_drain_all_begin_nopoll()
> >   Import clang-tsa.h
> >   clang-tsa: Add TSA_ASSERT() macro
> >   clang-tsa: Add macros for shared locks
> >   configure: Enable -Wthread-safety if present
> >   test-bdrv-drain: Fix incorrrect drain assumptions
> >   block: Fix locking in external_snapshot_prepare()
> >   graph-lock: TSA annotations for lock/unlock functions
> >   Mark assert_bdrv_graph_readable/writable() GRAPH_RD/WRLOCK
> >   block: GRAPH_RDLOCK for functions only called by co_wrappers
> > 
> > Paolo Bonzini (1):
> >   graph-lock: Introduce a lock to protect block graph operations
> > 
> Reviewed-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>

Thanks, applied to block-next.

Kevin



      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-12 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-07 13:18 [PATCH 00/18] block: Introduce a block graph rwlock Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 01/18] block: Factor out bdrv_drain_all_begin_nopoll() Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 02/18] graph-lock: Introduce a lock to protect block graph operations Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 03/18] graph-lock: Implement guard macros Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 04/18] async: Register/unregister aiocontext in graph lock list Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 05/18] Import clang-tsa.h Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 06/18] clang-tsa: Add TSA_ASSERT() macro Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 07/18] clang-tsa: Add macros for shared locks Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 08/18] configure: Enable -Wthread-safety if present Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 09/18] test-bdrv-drain: Fix incorrrect drain assumptions Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 10/18] block: Fix locking in external_snapshot_prepare() Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 11/18] block: wrlock in bdrv_replace_child_noperm Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 12/18] block: remove unnecessary assert_bdrv_graph_writable() Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 13/18] block: assert that graph read and writes are performed correctly Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 14/18] graph-lock: TSA annotations for lock/unlock functions Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 15/18] Mark assert_bdrv_graph_readable/writable() GRAPH_RD/WRLOCK Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 16/18] block-coroutine-wrapper.py: introduce annotations that take the graph rdlock Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 17/18] block: use co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock in functions taking the rdlock Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 18/18] block: GRAPH_RDLOCK for functions only called by co_wrappers Kevin Wolf
2022-12-07 14:12 ` [PATCH 00/18] block: Introduce a block graph rwlock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-12-07 16:08   ` Kevin Wolf
2022-12-12 17:14   ` Kevin Wolf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y5dhjKx4EdeOxJmQ@redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.