All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
	Leonardo Bras Soares Passos <lsoaresp@redhat.com>,
	Manish Mishra <manish.mishra@nutanix.com>,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] io: Add support for MSG_PEEK for socket channel
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:40:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5rrmRyhRjEiHtAe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y5pAiFv/JHQvgxha@x1n>

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 04:30:48PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:14:09AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 04:38:46PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > From: "manish.mishra" <manish.mishra@nutanix.com>
> > > 
> > > MSG_PEEK reads from the peek of channel, The data is treated as
> > > unread and the next read shall still return this data. This
> > > support is currently added only for socket class. Extra parameter
> > > 'flags' is added to io_readv calls to pass extra read flags like
> > > MSG_PEEK.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrang?? <berrange@redhat.co
> > > Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrang?? <berrange@redhat.com
> > 
> > The last letter of my name has been mangled - whatever tools used
> > to pull in manish's patches seem to not be UTF-8 clean.
> > 
> > Also the email addr isn't terminated, but that was pre-existing
> > in manish's previous posting.
> 
> I'll fix at least the latter in my next post, sorry.
> 
> For the 1st one - I am still looking at what went wrong.
> 
> Here from the web interfaces it all looks good (besides the wrong
> ending..), e.g. on lore or patchew:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221213213850.1481858-2-peterx@redhat.com/
> https://patchew.org/QEMU/20221213213850.1481858-1-peterx@redhat.com/20221213213850.1481858-2-peterx@redhat.com/
> 
> It also looks good with e.g. Gmail webclient.
> 
> Then I digged into the email headers and I found that comparing to Manish's
> original message, the patches I posted has one more line of "Content-type":
> 
>   Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>   Content-type: text/plain
>   https://patchew.org/QEMU/20221213213850.1481858-2-peterx@redhat.com/mbox
> 
> While Manish's patch only has one line:
> 
>   Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>   https://patchew.org/QEMU/20221123172735.25181-2-manish.mishra@nutanix.com/mbox

Don't trust what is shown by patchew, as that's been through many
hops.

The copy I receieved came directly to me via CC, so didn't hit mailman,
nor patchew, and that *only* has  "Content-type: text/plain".  So the
extra Content-type line with utf8 must have been added either by
mailman or patchew.

So it probably looks like a config problem in the tool you use to send
the patches originally.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-15  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-13 21:38 [PATCH 0/5] migration: Fix disorder of channel creations Peter Xu
2022-12-13 21:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] io: Add support for MSG_PEEK for socket channel Peter Xu
2022-12-14  9:14   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-12-14 21:30     ` Peter Xu
2022-12-15  9:40       ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2022-12-15 17:35         ` Peter Xu
2022-12-16 10:40           ` manish.mishra
2022-12-16 14:30             ` Peter Xu
2022-12-13 21:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] migration: check magic value for deciding the mapping of channels Peter Xu
2022-12-14  9:15   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-12-13 21:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] migration: Rework multi-channel checks on URI Peter Xu
2022-12-13 21:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] migration: Add a semaphore to count PONGs Peter Xu
2022-12-13 21:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] migration: Postpone postcopy preempt channel to be after main Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y5rrmRyhRjEiHtAe@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=lsoaresp@redhat.com \
    --cc=manish.mishra@nutanix.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.