From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6577C4332F for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 14:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p6BjX-0000zH-0p; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:30:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p6BjN-0000sw-Nu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:30:33 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p6BjG-0002fh-BZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:30:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1671201023; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tZK3vuXvz3aviHU8piPVuRxQwyn0IxPWklXnqlREHKQ=; b=P8kJSI4EfJm6rJWF7ODo9DgIhg/Og9qGWTNhPon+UXY3Pe1IMYi7FXnUuxZPCoGlZHsAuV 3nWGUtZVG0W4WBe50YGkQuQjnhhIjH+PXgvI1Rg4B0yK027ntMkOwVVH9U2TyjtzEvsgHa gjHZjBBDEDGW1zYUVDtBvZqukxkKjx8= Received: from mail-qk1-f197.google.com (mail-qk1-f197.google.com [209.85.222.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-608-4tjc-JOTO4iAf7xZXCbdzg-1; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:30:21 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 4tjc-JOTO4iAf7xZXCbdzg-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f197.google.com with SMTP id x2-20020a05620a448200b006fa7dad5c1cso1927126qkp.10 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 06:30:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=tZK3vuXvz3aviHU8piPVuRxQwyn0IxPWklXnqlREHKQ=; b=RpsBD2N4bXV4CXFFckAawQLuQYz/m4iQFgnnh+jBzrpe5bWyrY1PdgzQA/bkIZW7+U DqS/DSGaab7QuiKprtfc0PZ62i65G2UQbrYGzDsB7hB47Ztbo78zc6t88GjeDhKbobUY xiZJh3nS/nFR/JfTsAOF3cCgvA7MiNO5cvBLXoNxjuRlqvzjc64eoEyCEuv3vScPE44K UxA5y7JtJLFc3ChgxNuD/UjwpK2laz+o+vV3HAb+g3sdiM6jUSvdQRNbIMYZmKhngW4w qCOAYCB59GnaPxrFsVx74FDWQpwYLA6x0gLRh9PqevTmLloMfuxuJJqGSpNfwLUPSKWX rsAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plcQ6FQzN6XPUnlS0RfYW2pw8vjEkhUSitBzwMo4gqG231LSEBj 5o9myAz3Jo6EpW4RFXARnn4qoOerKvmEF1w1nRDtIQXIGPad14+LAkyg4evucQgEO6vJLg5EdBM zSNVK9kARLkzounc= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4353:0:b0:4e8:c749:7f3a with SMTP id q19-20020ad44353000000b004e8c7497f3amr20138564qvs.50.1671201021216; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 06:30:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf76KPfxTsMbwJWrbCeo1g8vV/GbsE5fiIxT/adLpc+6pwAcQT57hGAW3jLI/Y2Izo+VTjOx6g== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4353:0:b0:4e8:c749:7f3a with SMTP id q19-20020ad44353000000b004e8c7497f3amr20138538qvs.50.1671201020998; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 06:30:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from x1n (bras-base-aurron9127w-grc-45-70-31-26-132.dsl.bell.ca. [70.31.26.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i22-20020a05620a075600b006ffb452b10asm1563424qki.13.2022.12.16.06.30.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 16 Dec 2022 06:30:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:30:19 -0500 From: Peter Xu To: "manish.mishra" Cc: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela , Leonardo Bras Soares Passos , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] io: Add support for MSG_PEEK for socket channel Message-ID: References: <20221213213850.1481858-1-peterx@redhat.com> <20221213213850.1481858-2-peterx@redhat.com> <400814c5-f179-2566-e513-543ae4ae34e4@nutanix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <400814c5-f179-2566-e513-543ae4ae34e4@nutanix.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=peterx@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 04:10:22PM +0530, manish.mishra wrote: > Yes sorry, noticed it now, should i send another patch to update it. Also > in our internal testing we noticed multifd_init was skipped for 1 case, > so if this patch series is not yet submitted should i send another > version of it early morning monday? I think yes. Thanks, -- Peter Xu