All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@microsoft.com>,
	Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com>,
	drv@mailo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: convert atomic_* to refcount_* APIs
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:32:32 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6RjeCvgReLWQ89A@qemulion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y6PxNRgzPAdukDs5@kroah.com>

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 06:55:01AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 01:27:40AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > The refcount_* APIs are designed to address known issues with the
> > atomic_t APIs for reference counting. They protect the reference
> > counters from overflow/underflow, use-after-free errors, provide
> > improved memory ordering guarantee schemes, are neater and safer.
> > Hence, replace the atomic_* APIs by their equivalent refcount_t
> > API functions.
> >
> > This patch proposal address the following warnings generated by
> > the atomic_as_refcounter.cocci coccinelle script
> > 	atomic_add_return(-1, ...)
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
> > ---
> > Note: The patch is compile tested using dec_station.defconfig for
> >       MIPS architecture.
>
> Do you have this hardware?  If not, please just do
> one-variable-at-a-time so that if there are real problems, we can revert
> the offending change easier.  And it makes it simpler to review.

Hi Greg,
I do not have the hardware. I will make a one variable per patch change as
suggest and send in a patch set.

>
> But, are you sure this is correct:
>
> > -	irq_guard = atomic_add_return(1, &mux->irq_guard);
> > -	if (irq_guard != 1)
> > +	refcount_inc(&mux->irq_guard);
> > +	if (refcount_read(&mux->irq_guard) != 1)
>
> That is now different logic than before, why?  Are you sure this is ok?

This is not correct. I read it wrong. I will correct this in the patch set.

>
> I stopped reviewing here...
Thanks. I will review the rest of the changes per your advise and make the
corrections.

regards,
./drv

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h



      reply	other threads:[~2022-12-22 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-21 19:57 [PATCH] tty: serial: convert atomic_* to refcount_* APIs Deepak R Varma
2022-12-22  5:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-12-22 14:02   ` Deepak R Varma [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y6RjeCvgReLWQ89A@qemulion \
    --to=drv@mailo.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=kumarpraveen@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=ssengar@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.