From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03592C4167B for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:41:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ZF3pEkcDJznU3n8NjvRCPpBq7bOaMSgpxxlrFbb9d0c=; b=JnxMVDT4MnoJqB RPnQRP63NhLBOaPGHKlzrs/3GgxqIMM3NLM5j4B2jS2BfE8E6OXQv3AITevyT+p3Q8dY1c/eImDTd nZOJwB9CAz+0jrA/uEJP//8s6TIZWyjr4mJneX3hy3TDEov1R06d0KEb/2c0qxM5ZPgnuA7bfoOPt ZUhNuZ+NYCiDbPd6YdGFKF/7Yy4n4KMd8eU5zmMisPK+FBR++DkVBCgbpryRgr6/Sl5/L38k+oejy wNaCTKHK/R5fqLDG7bP2wGyGGePDz+VKOL1aqt/+nKC5QZnjJhgvXXeNkRrGJwNfyNC/G7puMxhmA 6KBSI3Zjox6UH/f1Z8aA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p8Oc8-00EFOu-1m; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:40:12 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p8ObR-00EDtT-4m for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:39:30 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F2BDB802C7; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6B7FC433D2; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:39:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1671727165; bh=egoBgDJa6cP4OcBqEvU1JwAhvMnDYhljcvNAPvTmGOA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=wVsAaR3/PYuF4uefDRfG6KYtQ6kn5M9SvaAgseL3FsMxKUZLoQUbhfJ9s25goBFrr CYsQaziLynj0Nxw5LK8YdkwStTnCcNQXHZUwonRwC6x5Sq+J2ztAG35d+CNH3bHUM3 sMJB1Kva+8U0JiUKuzBXOacf9PSlTvyZ7XvMF5/Q= Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 17:39:22 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Gatien Chevallier Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, Oleksii_Moisieiev@epam.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loic.pallardy@st.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce STM32 system bus Message-ID: References: <20221222100504.68247-1-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221222100504.68247-1-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221222_083929_366519_7D67015A X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.76 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:04:57AM +0100, Gatien Chevallier wrote: > Document STM32 System Bus. This bus is intended to control firewall > access for the peripherals connected to it. Why is this an "RFC"? That usually means "I have more work to do on it, but I'll send it out now anyway". What work is left? And for most code, I know I don't review "RFC" changes as there are too many "real" patches being submitted where people think their code is ready to be merged. Other reviewers might think otherwise, but be aware of this... thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCADC4167B for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229552AbiLVQj3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2022 11:39:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49664 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229526AbiLVQj2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2022 11:39:28 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCAFE286C7; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 08:39:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93402B81CFB; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6B7FC433D2; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:39:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1671727165; bh=egoBgDJa6cP4OcBqEvU1JwAhvMnDYhljcvNAPvTmGOA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=wVsAaR3/PYuF4uefDRfG6KYtQ6kn5M9SvaAgseL3FsMxKUZLoQUbhfJ9s25goBFrr CYsQaziLynj0Nxw5LK8YdkwStTnCcNQXHZUwonRwC6x5Sq+J2ztAG35d+CNH3bHUM3 sMJB1Kva+8U0JiUKuzBXOacf9PSlTvyZ7XvMF5/Q= Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 17:39:22 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Gatien Chevallier Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, Oleksii_Moisieiev@epam.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loic.pallardy@st.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, arnd@arndb.de Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce STM32 system bus Message-ID: References: <20221222100504.68247-1-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221222100504.68247-1-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:04:57AM +0100, Gatien Chevallier wrote: > Document STM32 System Bus. This bus is intended to control firewall > access for the peripherals connected to it. Why is this an "RFC"? That usually means "I have more work to do on it, but I'll send it out now anyway". What work is left? And for most code, I know I don't review "RFC" changes as there are too many "real" patches being submitted where people think their code is ready to be merged. Other reviewers might think otherwise, but be aware of this... thanks, greg k-h