From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Vincent Knecht <vincent.knecht@mailoo.org>,
linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] leds: is31fl319x: Wrap mutex_destroy() for devm_add_action_or_rest()
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 12:09:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6wV9afM+aDBxapQ@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221228093238.82713-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 11:32:38AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Clang complains that devm_add_action() takes a parameter with a wrong type:
>
> warning: cast from 'void (*)(struct mutex *)' to 'void (*)(void *)' converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict]
> err = devm_add_action(dev, (void (*)(void *))mutex_destroy, &is31->lock);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 1 warning generated.
>
> It appears that the commit e1af5c815586 ("leds: is31fl319x: Fix devm vs.
> non-devm ordering") missed two things:
> - while mention devm_add_action_or_reset() the actual change got
> devm_add_action() call by unknown reason
> - strictly speaking the parameter is not compatible by type
>
> Fix both issues by switching to devm_add_action_or_reset() and adding a
> wrapper for mutex_destroy() call.
This should be read as v2 actually (but code wise the v1 and v2 has no difference).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-28 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-28 9:32 [PATCH v1 1/1] leds: is31fl319x: Wrap mutex_destroy() for devm_add_action_or_rest() Andy Shevchenko
2022-12-28 10:09 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-01-09 17:06 ` Lee Jones
2023-01-09 17:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-01-10 10:10 ` Lee Jones
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-04 23:59 Andy Shevchenko
2022-11-05 12:37 ` Vincent Knecht
2022-11-07 11:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y6wV9afM+aDBxapQ@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=vincent.knecht@mailoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.